开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

muamadove · 2022年05月02日

small size relative to company size是什么意思

NO.PZ2019100901000004

问题如下:

William Azarov is a portfolio manager for Westcome Investments, an asset management firm. Azarov is preparing for meetings with two of Westcome’s clients and obtains the help of Jason Boulder, a junior analyst. The first meeting is with Maglav Inc., a rapidly growing US-based technology firm with a young workforce and high employee turnover. Azarov directs Boulder to review the details of Maglav’s defined benefit (DB) pension plan. The plan is overfunded and has assets under management of $25 million. Boulder makes the following two observations:

Observation 1 Maglav’s shareholders benefit from the plan’s overfunded status.

Observation 2 The funded ratio of Maglav’s plan will decrease if employee turnover decreases.

Maglav outsources the management of the pension plan entirely to Westcome Investments. The fee structure requires Maglav to compensate Westcome with a high base fee regardless of performance. Boulder tells Azarov that outsourcing offers small institutional investors, such as Maglav’s pension plan, the following three benefits:

Benefit 1: Regulatory requirements are reduced.

Benefit 2: Conflicts of interest are eliminated from principal–agent issues.

Benefit 3: Investors have access to a wider range of investment strategies through scale benefits.

In the meeting with Maglav, Azarov describes the investment approach used by Westcome in managing the pension plan. The approach is characterized by a high allocation to alternative investments, significant active management, and a reliance on outsourcing assets to other external asset managers. Azarov also explains that Maglav’s operating results have a low correlation with pension asset returns and that the investment strategy is affected by the fact that the pension fund assets are a small portion of Maglav’s market capitalization. Azarov states that the plan is subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) and follows generally accepted accounting principles, including Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 715, Compensation—Retirement Benefits.

The risk tolerance of Maglav’s pension plan can be best characterized as being:

选项:

A.

below average.

B.

average.

C.

above average.

解释:

C is correct.

The risk tolerance for Maglav’s defined benefit plan is high and thus above average. Several factors influence the plan sponsor’s ability to assume risk. For Maglav, the overfunded status of the pension fund allows the plan to withstand more volatility, and its small size relative to the company size implies greater risk tolerance. The low correlation of Maglav’s operating results with pension asset returns also results in greater risk tolerance. Finally, the workforce characteristics imply greater risk tolerance. The younger workforce increases the duration of the plan liabilities and enables the sponsor to take on more liquidity risk. The high turnover of the workforce means fewer employees may be vested, reducing the number of employees entitled to receive defined benefit payments. All these factors contribute to an above average risk tolerance for Maglav’s defined benefit plan.

这个是哪个知识点?为什么small relative to company size是更能够承受风险?

1 个答案

lynn_品职助教 · 2022年05月05日

嗨,努力学习的PZer你好:


(1)考察的知识点主要是DB Fund性质和特点。DB Fund,雇主和员工只约定员工退休后每个月拿确定的退休金(Benefit),所以是养老金将来的Cash outflow是定死的。


但是DB Fund并没有约定员工在职时,雇主需要交多少Contribution,也就是说,DB Fund只约定公司给退休员工发确定数额的退休金,至于员工在职时公司交了多少Contribution是无所谓的。并没有强制公司一定要交Contribution。


那这样的话,实际上意思就是,如果我们Pension plan asset基金运作的好的话,仅仅靠Asset的本金和投资收益就能Cover住养老金负债的话,雇主每年都不用交Contribution也可以运行下去。因此overfunded是好的,另外low correlation和劳动力年轻化等是从养老基金投资和支出的角度去看风险的问题


(2)为什么small relative to company size是更能够承受风险?

老师上课也提到过美国很多公司都背负着沉重的养老负担,如果不是只显示净值,而是把DB plan的资产负债全部并表,公司会看上去更像一家基金公司,因此这个基金越小它对整家公司运营的影响就会越小,我们可以想象一下,假如遇到股灾,DB plan今年需要的contribution可能会比公司一年的盈利还要多。

----------------------------------------------
加油吧,让我们一起遇见更好的自己!