为什么不选c

* 问题详情，请查看题干

NO.PZ201511190100000302

问题如下：

Which of Tang’s observations is least likely to be the consequence of Jordan demonstrating loss-aversion bias?

选项：

Observation 1.

Observation 2.

Observation 3.

解释：

C is correct.

Loss aversion by itself may cause a sector concentration; however, a market neutral strategy tends to focus on individual stocks without regard to the sector. The sector exposure would be mitigated with the balancing of the individual long and short positions.

如果一直存有亏损的头寸也会导致头寸集中吧

添加评论

1 个答案

已采纳答案

王琛_品职助教 · 2022年03月23日

嗨，爱思考的PZer你好：

是的，但是即便有这种可能性 (正如解析所提到的：Loss aversion by itself may cause a sector concentration)，但是相比与选项 A 和 B 的可能性而言，也是最低的，即 least likely，所以选 C

这道题我之前刚好总结过，请同学先参考一下：https://class.pzacademy.com/qa/88186

----------------------------------------------
努力的时光都是限量版，加油！

添加评论

1
回答
0
关注
414
浏览

我要回答关注问题

相关问题

2022-12-22 15:30 3 · 回答

NO.PZ201511190100000302 问题如下 Whiof Tang’s observations is least likely to the consequenof Jorn monstrating loss-aversion bias? A.Observation 1. B.Observation 2. C.Observation 3. C is correct.Loss aversion itself mcause a sector concentration; however, a market neutrstrategy ten to focus on invistocks without regarto the sector. The sector exposure woulmitigatewith the balancing of the invilong anshort positions. Observation 2: The trang volume of the funhcreasemore th40 percent ring the past year.Observation 3: The portfolio is more concentratein a few sectors thin the past.他loss aversion 就将亏损的股票全部持有，好的股票都卖了，trang volume为什么会下降啊？不是应该不变或者上升吗？C亏的都留着在，那就是可能集中在某些行业，因为行业风险的原因一亏都亏，所以更集中C应该是对的的呀 B是错的呀，求解

2022-11-29 13:56 1 · 回答

2022-07-04 11:59 2 · 回答

NO.PZ201511190100000302 Observation 2. Observation 3. C is correct. Loss aversion itself mcause a sector concentration; however, a market neutrstrategy ten to focus on invistocks without regarto the sector. The sector exposure woulmitigatewith the balancing of the invilong anshort positions. position unr water 是指现在的持仓太少了么

2022-02-15 10:46 1 · 回答

为什么不选c

1 个答案

1

0

414

相关问题