开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

滴滴姐姐~ · 2022年01月18日

investment capacity

NO.PZ2019012201000039

问题如下:

Matt makes the following statements about investing with long-only managers:

Statement 1 A long-only portfolio puts a firm floor on how much an investor can win.

Statement 2 A long-only portfolio generally allows for greater investment capacity than other approaches, particularly when using strategies that focus on large-cap stocks.

Which of Matt’s statements regarding investing with long-only managers is correct?

选项:

A.

Only Statement 1

B.

Only Statement 2

C.

Both Statement 1 and Statement 2

解释:

B is correct.

考点:Long/Short, Long Extension, And Market-neutral

解析:表述1错在投资者不是为收益设定底线,而是为损失设定了底线。因为股票价格可以跌到的最低水平为零,而上涨空间是无限的,因此,只做多的投资者最大可能损失的金额就等于股票的初始投资。

这个是啥意思呀到底。。。

我看以前的助教回复

有说能管理多大的市场规模的、有说多大程度能实现策略的。。。

别告诉我这俩一个意思昂哈哈哈哈


求个确定的答案!

谢谢!~

1 个答案

笛子_品职助教 · 2022年01月19日

嗨,从没放弃的小努力你好:


这个题目知识点并不难,关键是读懂英文表述。


首先明确,这两个不是一个意思。

一个是盈利是否是有限的,一个是能够容纳多大规模。


这个题目问的是,只做多的基金有什么特点:

陈述1:Statement 1 A long-only portfolio puts a firm floor on how much an investor can win.

翻译成中文,意思就是:只做多的投资组合,在盈利金额上是有限制的(puts a firm floor on how much an investor can win.)

这句话显然不对,见解析,盈利是无限制的。


陈述2:A long-only portfolio generally allows for greater investment capacity than other approaches, particularly when using strategies that focus on large-cap stocks.

只做多的投资组合,(比做空的投资组合)资金容量更大,这句话正确。

----------------------------------------------
加油吧,让我们一起遇见更好的自己!

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 406

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ2019012201000039 问题如下 Matt makes the following statements about investing with long-only managers: Statement 1 A long-only portfolio puts a firm floor on how muinvestor cwin. Statement 2 A long-only portfolio generally allows for greater investment capacity thother approaches, particularly when using strategies thfocus on large-cstocks. Whiof Matt’s statements regarng investing with long-only managers is correct? Only Statement 1 Only Statement 2 Both Statement 1 anStatement 2 B is correct. 考点:Long/Short, Long Extension, AnMarket-neutral 解析:表述1错在投资者不是为收益设定底线,而是为损失设定了底线。因为股票价格可以跌到的最低水平为零,而上涨空间是无限的,因此,只做多的投资者最大可能损失的金额就等于股票的初始投资。 请问这道题Statement 2 讲的是什么啊? 为什么正确?

2024-04-05 07:50 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2019012201000039 问题如下 Matt makes the following statements about investing with long-only managers: Statement 1 A long-only portfolio puts a firm floor on how muinvestor cwin. Statement 2 A long-only portfolio generally allows for greater investment capacity thother approaches, particularly when using strategies thfocus on large-cstocks. Whiof Matt’s statements regarng investing with long-only managers is correct? Only Statement 1 Only Statement 2 Both Statement 1 anStatement 2 B is correct. 考点:Long/Short, Long Extension, AnMarket-neutral 解析:表述1错在投资者不是为收益设定底线,而是为损失设定了底线。因为股票价格可以跌到的最低水平为零,而上涨空间是无限的,因此,只做多的投资者最大可能损失的金额就等于股票的初始投资。 A long-only portfolio generally allows for greater investment capacity thother approaches, particularly when using strategies thfocus on large-cstocks.

2024-01-10 16:59 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2019012201000039 问题如下 Matt makes the following statements about investing with long-only managers: Statement 1 A long-only portfolio puts a firm floor on how muinvestor cwin. Statement 2 A long-only portfolio generally allows for greater investment capacity thother approaches, particularly when using strategies thfocus on large-cstocks. Whiof Matt’s statements regarng investing with long-only managers is correct? Only Statement 1 Only Statement 2 Both Statement 1 anStatement 2 B is correct. 考点:Long/Short, Long Extension, AnMarket-neutral 解析:表述1错在投资者不是为收益设定底线,而是为损失设定了底线。因为股票价格可以跌到的最低水平为零,而上涨空间是无限的,因此,只做多的投资者最大可能损失的金额就等于股票的初始投资。 statement 2应该是long-short吧?

2023-08-26 17:12 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2019012201000039问题如下 Matt makes the following statements about investing with long-only managers: Statement 1 A long-only portfolio puts a firm floor on how muinvestor cwin. Statement 2 A long-only portfolio generally allows for greater investment capacity thother approaches, particularly when using strategies thfocus on large-cstocks. Whiof Matt’s statements regarng investing with long-only managers is correct? Only Statement 1 Only Statement 2 Both Statement 1 anStatement 2 B is correct. 考点:Long/Short, Long Extension, AnMarket-neutral 解析:表述1错在投资者不是为收益设定底线,而是为损失设定了底线。因为股票价格可以跌到的最低水平为零,而上涨空间是无限的,因此,只做多的投资者最大可能损失的金额就等于股票的初始投资。 能中文翻译下两个题干么

2023-07-22 13:16 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2019012201000039 问题如下 Matt makes the following statements about investing with long-only managers: Statement 1 A long-only portfolio puts a firm floor on how muinvestor cwin. Statement 2 A long-only portfolio generally allows for greater investment capacity thother approaches, particularly when using strategies thfocus on large-cstocks. Whiof Matt’s statements regarng investing with long-only managers is correct? Only Statement 1 Only Statement 2 Both Statement 1 anStatement 2 B is correct. 考点:Long/Short, Long Extension, AnMarket-neutral 解析:表述1错在投资者不是为收益设定底线,而是为损失设定了底线。因为股票价格可以跌到的最低水平为零,而上涨空间是无限的,因此,只做多的投资者最大可能损失的金额就等于股票的初始投资。 A long-only portfolio puts a firm floor on how muinvestor cwin.这话本身应该没错吧, 我long only最大收益无限, 最小收益为0, 不就是为win设定了floor吗? floor=0不是吗?

2023-02-17 22:58 1 · 回答