开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)｜3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

返回

勇往直前 · 2021年12月11日

为什么不是5%*50%*30%

  1. CFA I
  2. Quantitative

NO.PZ2021062201000006

问题如下：

In a typical year, 5% of all CEOs are fired for "performance" reasons. Assume that CEO performance is judged according to stock performance and that 50% of stocks have above-average returns or "good" performance. Empirically, 30% of all CEOs who were fired had "good" performance.

Using Bayes' formula, what is the probability that a CEO will be fired given "good" performance? (Hint, let P(A) be the probability of a CEO being fired, P(B) be the probability of a "good" performance rating, P(B I A) be the likelihood of a "good" performance rating given that the CEO was fired, and P(A I B) be the likelihood of the CEO being fired given a "good" performance rating.)

选项：

A.

1.5%

B.

2.5%

C.

3.0%

解释：

C is correct. With Bayes' formula, the probability of the CEO being fired given a "good" rating is：

P(A∣B)=P(B∣A)P(B)P(A)P(A|B) = \frac{{P(B|A)}}{{P(B)}}P(A)

where

P(A) = 0.05 = probability of the CEO being fired

P(B) = 0.50 = probability of a "good" rating

P(B | A) = 0.30 = probability of a "good" rating given that the CEO is fired

With these estimates, the probability of the CEO being fired given a "good" rating is：

P(A∣B)=P(B∣A)P(B)P(A)=0.30.5×0.05=0.03P(A|B) = \frac{{P(B|A)}}{{P(B)}}P(A) = \frac{{0.3}}{{0.5}} \times 0.05 = 0.03

Although 5% of all CEOs are fired, the probability of being fired given a "good" performance rating is 3%.

知识点：Probability Concepts-Bayes' Formula

为什么不是5%*50%*30%再除以第一个条件，这个计算和视频课中的做法不一样。真的很困惑，麻烦老师帮忙。谢谢
添加评论
1 个答案

星星_品职助教 · 2021年12月11日

同学你好，

视频中讲的是画图的做法。画图法的前提是：给出一个非条件概率和一个条件概率

而这道题给出的是两个非条件概率，所以需要套用公式来做。

按照讲义上的这个公式，代入题干中给出的A、B，就可以解题。公式右侧的三项内容题干中都是直接给出的。


  • 1

    回答

  • 0

    关注

  • 469

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ2021062201000006 问题如下 In a typicyear, 5% of all CEOs are firefor \"performance\" reasons. Assume thCEO performanis jueaccorng to stoperformananth50% of stocks have above-average returns or \"goo" performance. Empirically, 30% of all CEOs who were fireh\"goo" performance. Using Bayes' formulwhis the probability tha CEO will firegiven \"goo" performance? (Hint, let P(the probability of a CEO being fire P(the probability of a \"goo" performanrating, P(B I the likelihooof a \"goo" performanrating given ththe CEO wfire anP(A I the likelihooof the CEO being firegiven a \"goo" performanrating.) A.1.5% B.2.5% C.3.0% C is correct. With Bayes' formulthe probability of the CEO being firegiven a \"goo" rating isP(A∣B)=P(B∣A)P(B)P(A)P(A|= \frac{{P(B|A)}}{{P(B)}}P(A)P(A∣B)=P(B)P(B∣A)​P(A)where P(= 0.05 = probability of the CEO being fireP(= 0.50 = probability of a \"goo" rating P(B | = 0.30 = probability of a \"goo" rating given ththe CEO is fireWith these estimates, the probability of the CEO being firegiven a \"goo" rating isP(A∣B)=P(B∣A)P(B)P(A)=0.30.5×0.05=0.03P(A|= \frac{{P(B|A)}}{{P(B)}}P(= \frac{{0.3}}{{0.5}} \times 0.05 = 0.03P(A∣B)=P(B)P(B∣A)​P(A)=0.50.3​×0.05=0.03Although 5% of all CEOs are fire the probability of being firegiven a \"goo" performanrating is 3%.知识点Probability Concepts-Bayes' Formul 30% of all CEOs who were fireh\"goo" performance.这句话读不懂是P（B|A）还是P（A|B）

2023-08-07 14:34 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2021062201000006 问题如下 In a typicyear, 5% of all CEOs are firefor \"performance\" reasons. Assume thCEO performanis jueaccorng to stoperformananth50% of stocks have above-average returns or \"goo" performance. Empirically, 30% of all CEOs who were fireh\"goo" performance. Using Bayes' formulwhis the probability tha CEO will firegiven \"goo" performance? (Hint, let P(the probability of a CEO being fire P(the probability of a \"goo" performanrating, P(B I the likelihooof a \"goo" performanrating given ththe CEO wfire anP(A I the likelihooof the CEO being firegiven a \"goo" performanrating.) A.1.5% B.2.5% C.3.0% C is correct. With Bayes' formulthe probability of the CEO being firegiven a \"goo" rating isP(A∣B)=P(B∣A)P(B)P(A)P(A|= \frac{{P(B|A)}}{{P(B)}}P(A)P(A∣B)=P(B)P(B∣A)​P(A)where P(= 0.05 = probability of the CEO being fireP(= 0.50 = probability of a \"goo" rating P(B | = 0.30 = probability of a \"goo" rating given ththe CEO is fireWith these estimates, the probability of the CEO being firegiven a \"goo" rating isP(A∣B)=P(B∣A)P(B)P(A)=0.30.5×0.05=0.03P(A|= \frac{{P(B|A)}}{{P(B)}}P(= \frac{{0.3}}{{0.5}} \times 0.05 = 0.03P(A∣B)=P(B)P(B∣A)​P(A)=0.50.3​×0.05=0.03Although 5% of all CEOs are fire the probability of being firegiven a \"goo" performanrating is 3%.知识点Probability Concepts-Bayes' Formul 为什么是2个非条件概率呢？表现好与不好是非条件概率，非条件概率应该放在第一支；在股票表现好的情况下被解雇的概率是30%，这个不就是条件概率嘛？应该放在第二支。请问以上有什么问题呢？麻烦详解一下，谢谢。

2022-06-23 20:10 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2021062201000006问题如下 In a typicyear, 5% of all CEOs are firefor \"performance\" reasons. Assume thCEO performanis jueaccorng to stoperformananth50% of stocks have above-average returns or \"goo" performance. Empirically, 30% of all CEOs who were fireh\"goo" performance. Using Bayes' formulwhis the probability tha CEO will firegiven \"goo" performance? (Hint, let P(the probability of a CEO being fire P(the probability of a \"goo" performanrating, P(B I the likelihooof a \"goo" performanrating given ththe CEO wfire anP(A I the likelihooof the CEO being firegiven a \"goo" performanrating.) A.1.5%B.2.5%C.3.0% C is correct. With Bayes' formulthe probability of the CEO being firegiven a \"goo" rating isP(A∣B)=P(B∣A)P(B)P(A)P(A|= \frac{{P(B|A)}}{{P(B)}}P(A)P(A∣B)=P(B)P(B∣A)​P(A)where P(= 0.05 = probability of the CEO being fireP(= 0.50 = probability of a \"goo" rating P(B | = 0.30 = probability of a \"goo" rating given ththe CEO is fireWith these estimates, the probability of the CEO being firegiven a \"goo" rating isP(A∣B)=P(B∣A)P(B)P(A)=0.30.5×0.05=0.03P(A|= \frac{{P(B|A)}}{{P(B)}}P(= \frac{{0.3}}{{0.5}} \times 0.05 = 0.03P(A∣B)=P(B)P(B∣A)​P(A)=0.50.3​×0.05=0.03Although 5% of all CEOs are fire the probability of being firegiven a \"goo" performanrating is 3%.知识点Probability Concepts-Bayes' Formul完全看不懂怎么算的，又不能画图，转晕了，请老师帮忙，否则得放弃这块了。。。

2022-04-02 19:32 2 · 回答

NO.PZ2021062201000006 不是说遇到贝叶斯问题就直接画图，不需要背公式吗？怎么讲师的回复说这道题没法画图了呢？

2021-12-16 13:21 2 · 回答