开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

moon · 2021年11月25日

taxable account

NO.PZ2021090803000002

问题如下:

Private wealth manager Udaga Wacho is discussing a decumulation strategy with client Dogenza Ka. The strategy involves two of Ka’s accounts, a taxable account and a tax-exempt account, and will allow Ka to withdraw $200,000 each year. Both accounts have a current balance of $1 million.

Ka asks Wacho if he should withdraw funds from the taxable account first until it is depleted prior to withdrawing from the tax-exempt account, or vice versa. Wacho reviews the accounts to make a recommendation; he assumes a fixed, pre-tax rate of return of 10% for both accounts and that earnings in the taxable account are taxed at a fixed effective rate of 25%. Wacho recommends that Ka withdraw funds from the taxable account first until it is depleted prior to withdrawing from the tax-exempt account.

Discuss why Wacho’s recommended decumulation strategy is the more tax-efficient strategy.

选项:

解释:

Wacho’s recommendation to withdraw funds from the taxable account first until it is depleted prior to withdrawing from the tax-exempt account is the more tax-efficient decumulation strategy. The tax-exempt account will compound at a higher rate (the pre-tax rate of 10%) than the taxable account (with an after-tax rate of 10% × (1 − 0.25) = 7.5%). With a fixed tax rate, it is optimal to make withdrawals from the taxable account first and allow the tax-exempt account to continue to compound. The two tables below demonstrate this outcome over the first 10 years: At the end of 10 years, the ending balance is larger under the tax-aware strategy ($1,800,752) than under the tax-indifferent strategy ($1,480,097).


请问875000(下图红框)是怎么算出来的?从taxable account取钱不是要交税嘛?这个tax被考虑在了哪里



2 个答案

王暄_品职助教 · 2022年01月15日

计算过程如下:

由于有10%的PRE-TAX RETURN,所以本年赚得:1,000,000*10%=100,000

100,000要缴纳25%得税收:100,000*(1-25%)=75,000

所以最终value:1,000,000+75,000-200,000=875,000


王暄_品职助教 · 2021年11月25日

不用,taxable account不要缴税,只有TDA缴纳withdrawal tax

mino酱是个小破货 · 2023年08月23日

taxable不是不要缴税,而是没有withdraw tax

  • 2

    回答
  • 4

    关注
  • 832

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ2021090803000002 问题如下 Private wealth manager Uga Wacho is scussing a cumulation strategy with client genza KThe strategy involves two of Ka’s accounts, a taxable account ana tax-exempt account, anwill allow Ka to with$200,000 eayear. Both accounts have a current balanof $1 million.Ka asks Wacho if he shoulwithfun from the taxable account first until it is pleteprior to withawing from the tax-exempt account, or viversWacho reviews the accounts to make a recommention; he assumes a fixe pre-trate of return of 10% for both accounts anthearnings in the taxable account are taxea fixeeffective rate of 25%. Wacho recommen thKa withfun from the taxable account first until it is pleteprior to withawing from the tax-exempt account. scuss why Wacho’s recommencumulation strategy is the more tax-efficient strategy. Wacho’s recommention to withfun from the taxable account first until it is pleteprior to withawing from the tax-exempt account is the more tax-efficient cumulation strategy. The tax-exempt account will compouna higher rate (the pre-trate of 10%) ththe taxable account (with after-trate of 10% × (1 − 0.25) = 7.5%). With a fixetrate, it is optimto make withawals from the taxable account first anallow the tax-exempt account to continue to compoun The two tables below monstrate this outcome over the first 10 years: the enof 10 years, the enng balanis larger unr the tax-aware strategy ($1,800,752) thunr the tax-infferent strategy ($1,480,097). 如题,在A方法中,麻烦老师列出year-entaxable account balan在第一年那一行中的875,000怎么算出来的

2024-05-23 11:29 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2021090803000002 问题如下 Private wealth manager Uga Wacho is scussing a cumulation strategy with client genza KThe strategy involves two of Ka’s accounts, a taxable account ana tax-exempt account, anwill allow Ka to with$200,000 eayear. Both accounts have a current balanof $1 million.Ka asks Wacho if he shoulwithfun from the taxable account first until it is pleteprior to withawing from the tax-exempt account, or viversWacho reviews the accounts to make a recommention; he assumes a fixe pre-trate of return of 10% for both accounts anthearnings in the taxable account are taxea fixeeffective rate of 25%. Wacho recommen thKa withfun from the taxable account first until it is pleteprior to withawing from the tax-exempt account. scuss why Wacho’s recommencumulation strategy is the more tax-efficient strategy. Wacho’s recommention to withfun from the taxable account first until it is pleteprior to withawing from the tax-exempt account is the more tax-efficient cumulation strategy. The tax-exempt account will compouna higher rate (the pre-trate of 10%) ththe taxable account (with after-trate of 10% × (1 − 0.25) = 7.5%). With a fixetrate, it is optimto make withawals from the taxable account first anallow the tax-exempt account to continue to compoun The two tables below monstrate this outcome over the first 10 years: the enof 10 years, the enng balanis larger unr the tax-aware strategy ($1,800,752) thunr the tax-infferent strategy ($1,480,097). rt

2024-03-08 13:49 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2021090803000002问题如下 Private wealth manager Uga Wacho is scussing a cumulation strategy with client genza KThe strategy involves two of Ka’s accounts, a taxable account ana tax-exempt account, anwill allow Ka to with$200,000 eayear. Both accounts have a current balanof $1 million.Ka asks Wacho if he shoulwithfun from the taxable account first until it is pleteprior to withawing from the tax-exempt account, or viversWacho reviews the accounts to make a recommention; he assumes a fixe pre-trate of return of 10% for both accounts anthearnings in the taxable account are taxea fixeeffective rate of 25%. Wacho recommen thKa withfun from the taxable account first until it is pleteprior to withawing from the tax-exempt account. scuss why Wacho’s recommencumulation strategy is the more tax-efficient strategy. Wacho’s recommention to withfun from the taxable account first until it is pleteprior to withawing from the tax-exempt account is the more tax-efficient cumulation strategy. The tax-exempt account will compouna higher rate (the pre-trate of 10%) ththe taxable account (with after-trate of 10% × (1 − 0.25) = 7.5%). With a fixetrate, it is optimto make withawals from the taxable account first anallow the tax-exempt account to continue to compoun The two tables below monstrate this outcome over the first 10 years: the enof 10 years, the enng balanis larger unr the tax-aware strategy ($1,800,752) thunr the tax-infferent strategy ($1,480,097). 老师,请问101585和51283两个数是怎么算出来的

2023-11-24 17:19 2 · 回答

NO.PZ2021090803000002问题如下 Private wealth manager Uga Wacho is scussing a cumulation strategy with client genza KThe strategy involves two of Ka’s accounts, a taxable account ana tax-exempt account, anwill allow Ka to with$200,000 eayear. Both accounts have a current balanof $1 million.Ka asks Wacho if he shoulwithfun from the taxable account first until it is pleteprior to withawing from the tax-exempt account, or viversWacho reviews the accounts to make a recommention; he assumes a fixe pre-trate of return of 10% for both accounts anthearnings in the taxable account are taxea fixeeffective rate of 25%. Wacho recommen thKa withfun from the taxable account first until it is pleteprior to withawing from the tax-exempt account. scuss why Wacho’s recommencumulation strategy is the more tax-efficient strategy. Wacho’s recommention to withfun from the taxable account first until it is pleteprior to withawing from the tax-exempt account is the more tax-efficient cumulation strategy. The tax-exempt account will compouna higher rate (the pre-trate of 10%) ththe taxable account (with after-trate of 10% × (1 − 0.25) = 7.5%). With a fixetrate, it is optimto make withawals from the taxable account first anallow the tax-exempt account to continue to compoun The two tables below monstrate this outcome over the first 10 years: the enof 10 years, the enng balanis larger unr the tax-aware strategy ($1,800,752) thunr the tax-infferent strategy ($1,480,097). 如果考试遇到这个题需要把计算过程写出来吗?

2022-03-31 12:36 2 · 回答

NO.PZ2021090803000002 没有看懂 可以详细一下吗

2022-03-13 08:19 1 · 回答