开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

追风少年NKU · 2021年11月20日

关于此题答案的解释

NO.PZ2020033002000085

问题如下:

Durian Bank's risk control manager is using Creditrisk + to calculate the bank's 1% credit var. Durian Bank now has two large loans, one is 20 million US dollars, the other is 30 million US dollars, the two are not correlated. Which of the following conclusions about credit var is wrong?

I.Both VaR and WCL could be equal to zero.

II.Expected loss could exceed VaR

III.Expected loss is always smaller than the VAR.

选项:

A.

I and III

B.

I ONLY

C.

I and II.

D.III.

解释:

D is correct.

考点:Credit VaR

解析:比如两笔贷款的违约概率都是0.5%,两者联立的不违约概率是0.995*0.995等于99.0025%。此时99%的credit var等于0。worst case loss也是0。而expected loss不为零,比var和wcl大。

你好,我看了答案解释有一点疑问如下:


如果两笔的PD都是0.5%,那么99%的WCL确实不是两笔都违约的情形(20+30),而是一笔违约一笔不违约了吧?WCL应该是30而不是0?

1 个答案

DD仔_品职助教 · 2021年11月20日

嗨,爱思考的PZer你好:


两笔贷款PD都是0.5%,两笔一起不违约的概率是99.5%*99.5%=99.0025%。

99%被包含在了两笔一起不违约的99.0025%里,99.0025%的情况都是两个都不违约,WCL是0,那么99%WCL也是0。


----------------------------------------------
就算太阳没有迎着我们而来,我们正在朝着它而去,加油!

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 433

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ2020033002000085 问题如下 riBank's risk control manager is using Cretrisk + to calculate the bank's 1% cret var. riBank now htwo large loans, one is 20 million US llars, the other is 30 million US llars, the two are not correlate Whiof the following conclusions about cret vis wrong?I.Both VanWcoulequto zero.II.Expecteloss coulexceeVaRIII.Expecteloss is always smaller ththe VAR. I anIII I ONLY I anII. III. is correct.考点Cret VaR解析比如两笔贷款的违约概率都是0.5%,两者联立的不违约概率是0.995*0.995等于99.0025%。此时99%的cret var等于0。worst case loss也是0。而expecteloss不为零,比var和wcl大。 看不懂为什么要这么假设题干里也没有给这个信息啊

2023-08-14 22:04 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2020033002000085问题如下 riBank's risk control manager is using Cretrisk + to calculate the bank's 1% cret var. riBank now htwo large loans, one is 20 million US llars, the other is 30 million US llars, the two are not correlate Whiof the following conclusions about cret vis wrong?I.Both VanWcoulequto zero.II.Expecteloss coulexceeVaRIII.Expecteloss is always smaller ththe VAR. I anIIII ONLYI anII.III. is correct.考点Cret VaR解析比如两笔贷款的违约概率都是0.5%,两者联立的不违约概率是0.995*0.995等于99.0025%。此时99%的cret var等于0。worst case loss也是0。而expecteloss不为零,比var和wcl大。 希望从理论上彻底讲清楚,书上看不懂。

2023-07-16 16:48 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2020033002000085 问题如下 riBank's risk control manager is using Cretrisk + to calculate the bank's 1% cret var. riBank now htwo large loans, one is 20 million US llars, the other is 30 million US llars, the two are not correlate Whiof the following conclusions about cret vis wrong?I.Both VanWcoulequto zero.II.Expecteloss coulexceeVaRIII.Expecteloss is always smaller ththe VAR. I anIII I ONLY I anII. III. is correct.考点Cret VaR解析比如两笔贷款的违约概率都是0.5%,两者联立的不违约概率是0.995*0.995等于99.0025%。此时99%的cret var等于0。worst case loss也是0。而expecteloss不为零,比var和wcl大。 EL不是0,WCL=0。那Cret VaR就不等于0呀,只不过好像是一个负数。

2023-04-19 04:40 2 · 回答

NO.PZ2020033002000085 哈喽老师~ 题我做对了。。解析给看懵逼了。。。 比如两笔贷款的违约概率都是0.5%,两者联立的不违约概率是0.995*0.995等于99.0025%。(没毛病) 此时99%的cret var等于0。worst case loss也是0。 (从上一句话能推出来的不得是W= 0吗?Cret V不得用W- EL得到的吗?怎么Cret VaR先给安排出来了?) 而expecteloss不为零,比var和wcl大。 【我做前面几道题还有听老师讲课的意思都是先安排WCL和EL 然后俩人一减就算出来Cret VaR对吧】

2021-10-09 07:17 1 · 回答