开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

Yaq7 · 2021年11月15日

Answer C is incorrect because the golf program’s fund-raising campaign had already begun, so discussing the opportunity to donate was appropriate.

NO.PZ2016040303000040

问题如下:

Townsend was recently appointed to the board of directors of a youth golf program that is the local chapter of a national not-for-profit organization. The program is beginning a new fund-raising campaign to expand the number of annual scholarships it provides. Townsend believes many of her clients make annual donations to charity. The next week in her regular newsletter to all clients, she includes a small section discussing the fundraising campaign and her position on the organization’s board.

选项:

A.

Townsend did not violate the Code and Standards.

B.

Townsend violated the Code and Standards by soliciting donations from her clients through the newsletter.

C.

Townsend violated the Code and Standards by not getting approval of the organization before soliciting her clients.

解释:

A is correct.

Answer Townsend has not provided any information about her clients to the leaders or managers of the golf program; thus, she has not violated Standard III(E) – Preservation of Confidentiality. Providing contact information about her clients for a direct-mail solicitation would have been a violation. Answer B is incorrect because the notice in the newsletter does not violate Standard III(E). Answer C is incorrect because the golf program’s fund-raising campaign had already begun, so discussing the opportunity to donate was appropriate.

这句话没有理解 为啥已经开始了再discuss是ok的 这个关系到哪条准则

10 个答案
已采纳答案

王暄_品职助教 · 2021年11月15日

明白 主要是解析里这句话不是很理解【Answer C is incorrect because the golf program’s fund-raising campaign had already begun, so discussing the opportunity to donate was appropriate.】

因为C说的是他在招揽客户前没有得到这个高尔夫组织的approval,这个解释的意思实是这个donation已经开始,所以也并不需要任何的approaval。

其实除非题目特意强调要有approval from ogranization,否则根本不需要任何的approval for donation。

報施 · 2022年05月21日

ok

王暄_品职助教 · 2022年05月18日

T同學將golf program 發佈給他在金融领域所面临的的客户, 他在金融领域所面临的客户資料豈不是已泄露了給 golf program 嗎?

T同学讲golf的资料告诉客户,没有泄露客户资料。如果反过来把客户的信息告诉golf,才是泄漏了客户资料

報施 · 2022年05月18日

T同學將golf program 發佈給他在金融领域所面临的的客户, 他在金融领域所面临的客户資料豈不是已泄露了給 golf program 嗎?

王暄_品职助教 · 2022年05月18日

T同學將golf program 發佈給他的客戶,不是就泄露了客戶資訊給golf program 嗎?

Golf program不是他的客户

该program是一个非营利性组织,而且他是BOD,他所做的事情是帮他们募集资金

T同学的客户就是他在金融领域所面临的的客户。

報施 · 2022年05月18日

T同學將golf program 發佈給他在金融领域所面临的的客户, 他在金融领域所面临的客户資料豈不是已泄露了給 golf program 嗎?

報施 · 2022年05月17日

T同學將golf program 發佈給他的客戶,不是就泄露了客戶資訊給golf program 嗎?

報施 · 2022年05月17日

T同學將golf program 發佈給他的客戶,不是就泄露了客戶資訊給golf program 嗎?

王暄_品职助教 · 2022年05月17日

Townsend 是board of directors of a youth golf program, 不就是已把客戶名單泄露出去嗎?

他的客户并不是golf program,该program是一个非营利性组织,而且他是BOD,他所做的事情是帮他们募集资金

T同学的客户就是他在金融领域所面临的的客户。

報施 · 2022年05月16日

Townsend 是board of directors of a youth golf program, 不就是已把客戶名單泄露出去嗎?

王暄_品职助教 · 2021年11月15日

这里的重点并不在于【已经开始了再discuss是ok的 】

我简单概述一下题干的意思:Townsend是当地一家非营利性机构的BOD,最近这家机构在募集资金当助学金。Townsend自己本身的职业是投资经理,她知道自己有几位客户会做慈善捐赠。于是下周,当她结束她给客户的日常讲座的后,她单独召集了自己的一小批做慈善的客户,和他们说了她所在的非营利性机构募集资金的事儿(也就是希望他们可以捐点钱)

本体涉及【保密性】这条,他是把募捐的事情告诉了客户,询问他们是否可以捐钱,并非直接把客户信息透露给俱乐部,所以他没有违反准则的规定,有效的保护了客户的信息。

  • 10

    回答
  • 1

    关注
  • 928

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ2016040303000040 问题如下 Townsenwrecently appointeto the boarof rectors of a youth golf progrthis the locchapter of a nationnot-for-profit organization. The progris beginning a new funraising campaign to expanthe number of annuscholarships it provis. Townsenbelieves many of her clients make annunations to charity. The next week in her regulnewsletter to all clients, she inclus a small section scussing the funaising campaign anher position on the organization’s boar A.Townsennot violate the Co anStanr. B.Townsenviolatethe Co anStanr soliciting nations from her clients through the newsletter. C.Townsenviolatethe Co anStanr not getting approvof the organization before soliciting her clients. A is correct.Answer Townsenhnot proviany information about her clients to the lears or managers of the golf program; thus, she hnot violateStanrIII(E) – Preservation of Confintiality. Proving containformation about her clients for a rect-mail solicitation woulhave been a violation. Answer B is incorrebecause the notiin the newsletter es not violate StanrIII(E). Answer C is incorrebecause the golf program’s funraising campaign halrea begun, so scussing the opportunity to nate wappropriate. 她利用公司渠道发邮件给客户募集捐款,这个不是以权谋私吗?为什么没有违反呢?客户可能是因为信任公司这个品牌所以也会信任这个募捐,如果最后被发现募捐有问题(假募捐之类的),不是伤害了公司的声誉吗?

2024-07-08 08:30 2 · 回答

NO.PZ2016040303000040 问题如下 Townsenwrecently appointeto the boarof rectors of a youth golf progrthis the locchapter of a nationnot-for-profit organization. The progris beginning a new funraising campaign to expanthe number of annuscholarships it provis. Townsenbelieves many of her clients make annunations to charity. The next week in her regulnewsletter to all clients, she inclus a small section scussing the funaising campaign anher position on the organization’s boar A.Townsennot violate the Co anStanr. B.Townsenviolatethe Co anStanr soliciting nations from her clients through the newsletter. C.Townsenviolatethe Co anStanr not getting approvof the organization before soliciting her clients. A is correct.Answer Townsenhnot proviany information about her clients to the lears or managers of the golf program; thus, she hnot violateStanrIII(E) – Preservation of Confintiality. Proving containformation about her clients for a rect-mail solicitation woulhave been a violation. Answer B is incorrebecause the notiin the newsletter es not violate StanrIII(E). Answer C is incorrebecause the golf program’s funraising campaign halrea begun, so scussing the opportunity to nate wappropriate. 工作邮件里面发私人request里面为什么是没有违反职业道德啊?

2024-01-24 15:55 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2016040303000040问题如下 Townsenwrecently appointeto the boarof rectors of a youth golf progrthis the locchapter of a nationnot-for-profit organization. The progris beginning a new funraising campaign to expanthe number of annuscholarships it provis. Townsenbelieves many of her clients make annunations to charity. The next week in her regulnewsletter to all clients, she inclus a small section scussing the funaising campaign anher position on the organization’s boarA.Townsennot violate the Co anStanr.B.Townsenviolatethe Co anStanr soliciting nations from her clients through the newsletter.C.Townsenviolatethe Co anStanr not getting approvof the organization before soliciting her clients.A is correct.Answer Townsenhnot proviany information about her clients to the lears or managers of the golf program; thus, she hnot violateStanrIII(E) – Preservation of Confintiality. Proving containformation about her clients for a rect-mail solicitation woulhave been a violation. Answer B is incorrebecause the notiin the newsletter es not violate StanrIII(E). Answer C is incorrebecause the golf program’s funraising campaign halrea begun, so scussing the opportunity to nate wappropriate.做募捐不需要取得公司的同意吗?

2022-11-28 10:46 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2016040303000040 问题如下 Townsenwrecently appointeto the boarof rectors of a youth golf progrthis the locchapter of a nationnot-for-profit organization. The progris beginning a new funraising campaign to expanthe number of annuscholarships it provis. Townsenbelieves many of her clients make annunations to charity. The next week in her regulnewsletter to all clients, she inclus a small section scussing the funaising campaign anher position on the organization’s boar A.Townsennot violate the Co anStanr. B.Townsenviolatethe Co anStanr soliciting nations from her clients through the newsletter. C.Townsenviolatethe Co anStanr not getting approvof the organization before soliciting her clients. A is correct.Answer Townsenhnot proviany information about her clients to the lears or managers of the golf program; thus, she hnot violateStanrIII(E) – Preservation of Confintiality. Proving containformation about her clients for a rect-mail solicitation woulhave been a violation. Answer B is incorrebecause the notiin the newsletter es not violate StanrIII(E). Answer C is incorrebecause the golf program’s funraising campaign halrea begun, so scussing the opportunity to nate wappropriate. 客户捐款的话,不是会导致雇主的AUM下降么..这不算利益冲突么

2022-08-01 21:21 1 · 回答