开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

小叶子11 · 2021年09月21日

关于roll down return

Honanie and Puhuyesva meet to discuss the choice of debt indexes. Puhuyesva expresses her concerns about the difficulties they will face in trying to purchase securities to match the index chosen: “Whatever index we choose, my goal is to match it as closely as possible while minimizing costs. We will need to focus on minimizing tracking risk. One advantage we have over equity portfolio managers is that fixed-income valuation models are much more reliable than those for equities; therefore, it is much easier to determine the value of a fixed-income portfolio than an equity portfolio.”

Q. Is Puhuyesva most likely correct in her comments to Honanie regarding South American debt indexes?

  1. No. She is incorrect regarding valuation.
  2. Yes
  3. No. She is incorrect regarding tracking risk.

A is correct.

fixed-income valuation models are much more reliable than those for equities请问固收的估值模型比权益更可信,哪里不对,它说的是估值模型,未来现金流确定,现金流折现,确实比股票的估值模型准呀。又不是说市价

1 个答案

pzqa015 · 2021年09月22日

嗨,努力学习的PZer你好:


这道题出的不好。

首先,是没有fixed-income valuation models are much more reliable than those for equities这个结论的,fixed income与equity相比,只是现金流能跟确定,但是折现率估计同样存在不确定性。估值是由现金流与折现率共同组成的,不能因为现金流更好估计就说估值更靠谱。

其次,therefore后的半句话也是错误的,因为债券流动性差,随意portfolio value也不好确定。

----------------------------------------------
就算太阳没有迎着我们而来,我们正在朝着它而去,加油!

  • 1

    回答
  • 2

    关注
  • 533

    浏览
相关问题