开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

滴滴姐姐~ · 2021年09月12日

duration mapping为啥比CF mapping 有更少的风险因子捏

NO.PZ2019052001000068

问题如下:

Mapping refers to the assignment of risk factors to positions, and mapping choices can significantly influence VaR results. Compared with the cash flow mapping, duration mapping has the advantage that:

选项:

A.

Users can accurately map each amount of cash flow.

B.

Computational accuracy is much higher and more reliable than cash flow mapping

C.

Because the calculation accuracy is relatively high, it is also relatively time consuming.

D.

uses fewer risk factors, thus reducing data errors and model risk, but the accuracy of the estimate is relatively a bit lower.

解释:

D is correct.

考点:Duration mapping & Cash flow mapping

解析: Duration mapping 相比于Cash flow mapping 需要更少的风险因子。所以它的计算量更小,成本更低,模型风险也相应地更低。

哈喽哈喽


OR基础班讲义136页

有这么句话 感觉也没说为啥 难道是common sense?


CF mapping就是对期间现金流每笔都map一下?那risk factor是利率?

Duration mapping是对duration对应的那一笔现金流map一下?risk factor 也是利率?


难道这里的risk factor是指?key rate duration(CFmapping)和非常general的duration(duration mapping)?


蟹蟹蟹蟹~

1 个答案
已采纳答案

品职答疑小助手雍 · 2021年09月12日

同学你好,就是common sense。

其实利率和它对应的duration是一回事,每个利率(或者它对应的duration),就算作一个factor。

cf mapping有一堆期限,也就是一堆利率和duration要去对应,而duration mapping就一个duration和利率要考虑,那显然就是CF要考虑的factor多了。