开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

格格蔡斯 · 2021年08月12日

Ethics

NO.PZ2016040301000009

问题如下:

Albert and Tye, who recently started their own investment advisory business, have registered to take the Level III CFA examination. Albert’s business card reads, "Judy Albert, CFA Level II." Tye has not put anything about the CFA designation on his business card, but promotional material that he designed for the business describes the CFA requirements and indicates that Tye participates in the CFA Program and has completed Levels I and II. According to the Standards:

选项:

A.

Albert has violated the Standards, but Tye has not.

B.

Tye has violated the Standards, but Albert has not.

C.

Both Albert and Tye have violated the Standards.

解释:

A is correct.

Standard VII(B) –Reference to CFA Institute, the CFA Designation, and the CFA Program is the subject of this question. The reference on Albert’s business card implies that there is a "CFA Level II" designation; Tye merely indicates in promotional material that he is participating in the CFA Program and has completed Levels I and II. Candidates may not imply that there is some sort of partial designation earned after passing a level of the CFA exam. Therefore, Albert has violated Standard VII(B). Candidates may communicate that they are participating in the CFA Program, however, and may state the levels that they have completed. Therefore, Tye has not violated Standard VII(B).

老师好,请问Albert为什么违反啊,他报名三级考试,说明一级二级已经通过了啊,这个也不可以讲吗?

1 个答案

王暄_品职助教 · 2021年08月13日

Albert’s business card reads, "Judy Albert, CFA Level II”

注意,这里说A同学,在名片上,自己的名字后面,写的CFA Level II;这是不允许的。

没有这种写法,只有成为持证人了之后,才可以在名字后面写上CFA的字样,压根不许写CFA Level II