开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

sherry_lee · 2021年05月26日

RMRF是什么影响?

* 问题详情,请 查看题干

NO.PZ201909300100000302

问题如下:

Stephanie Tolmach is a consultant hired to create a performance attribution report on three funds held by a defined benefit pension plan (the Plan). Fund 1 is a domestic equity strategy, Fund 2 is a global equity strategy, and Fund 3 is a domestic fixed-income strategy.
Tolmach uses three approaches to attribution analysis: the return-based, holdings-based, and transaction-based approaches. The Plan’s investment committee asks Tolmach to (1) apply the attribution method that uses only each fund’s total portfolio returns over the last 12 months to identify return-generating components of the investment process and (2) include the impact of specific active investment decisions and the attribution effects of allocation and security selection in the report.
Tolmach first evaluates the performance of Fund 1 by constructing a Carhart factor model; the results are presented in Exhibit 1.

Tolmach turns her attention to Fund 2, constructing a region-based micro attribution analysis to evaluate the active decisions of the portfolio manager. The results are presented in Exhibit 2.

Next, Tolmach evaluates Fund 3 and the appropriateness of its benchmark. The benchmark is a cap-weighted bond index with daily reported performance; the index is rebalanced frequently, making it difficult to replicate. The benchmark has a meaningful investment in foreign bonds, whereas Fund 3 invests only in domestic bonds.
In the final section of the report, Tolmach reviews the entire Plan’s characteristics, asset allocation, and benchmark. Tolmach observes that the Plan’s benefits are no longer indexed to inflation and that the workforce is, on average, younger than it was when the current fund allocations were approved. Tolmach recommends a change in the Plan’s asset allocation policy.


2 Based on Exhibit 1 and relative to the benchmark, the manager of Fund 1 most likely used a:

选项:

A.

growth tilt.

B.

greater tilt toward small cap.

C.

momentum-based investing approach.

解释:

A is correct.

Based on the factor sensitivities in column 1 (negative sensitivity of –0.17 to HML) and the differences relative to the benchmark shown in column3, the manager likely had a growth tilt.

RMRF是什么影响?为什么权重偏差最大却不考虑?

1 个答案

吴昊_品职助教 · 2021年05月26日

嗨,从没放弃的小努力你好:


同学你好:

Carhart中,RMRF、SMB、HML和WML都是风险因子。

由于和benchmark承担的风险因子敞口不同,因此会带来不同的return。其中RMRF是市场因子,代表的是市场的风险溢价,即系统性风险。Rm-Rf前的系数β和1比较,如果β>1,说明market risk比较高;反之亦然。

现在我们三个选项分别对应的是HML、SMB以及WML这三个风险因子,所以不需要考虑RMRF这个风险因子。

----------------------------------------------
努力的时光都是限量版,加油!

  • 1

    回答
  • 1

    关注
  • 1477

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ201909300100000302问题如下 2 Baseon Exhibit 1 anrelative to the benchmark, the manager of Fun1 most likely usea:A.growth tilt.B.greater tilt towarsmall cap.C.momentum-baseinvesting approach.A is correct. Baseon the factor sensitivities in column 1 (negative sensitivity of –0.17 to HML) anthe fferences relative to the benchmark shown in column3, the manager likely ha growth tilt.为什么只考虑第三列的正负,不需要考虑第四列的正负?

2022-10-14 06:32 1 · 回答

NO.PZ201909300100000302问题如下2 Baseon Exhibit 1 anrelative to the benchmark, the manager of Fun1 most likely usea:A.growth tilt.B.greater tilt towarsmall cap.C.momentum-baseinvesting approach.A is correct. Baseon the factor sensitivities in column 1 (negative sensitivity of –0.17 to HML) anthe fferences relative to the benchmark shown in column3, the manager likely ha growth tilt.B是错在greater?

2022-07-31 23:07 1 · 回答

NO.PZ201909300100000302 请问老师, momentum-baseinvesting approa我知道这个不对, 就是这知识点我不记得了 请问这个是哪个知识点? 谢谢

2021-03-22 08:19 1 · 回答

greater tilt towarsmall cap. momentum-baseinvesting approach. A is correct. Baseon the factor sensitivities in column 1 (negative sensitivity of –0.17 to HML) anthe fferences relative to the benchmark shown in column3, the manager likely ha growth tilt. High minus low 不是high prito book value minus low prito book value吗,那么high p/b是growth呀,怎么是value呢  ? 到底这hml是什么意思

2020-11-29 13:32 1 · 回答