开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

July77 · 2021年04月23日

问一道题:NO.PZ201902210100000103 [ CFA III ]

* 问题详情,请 查看题干

问题如下:

Susan Winslow manages bond funds denominated in US Dollars, Euros, and British Pounds. Each fund invests in sovereign bonds and related derivatives. Each fund can invest a portion of its assets outside its base currency market with or without hedging the currency exposure, but to date Winslow has not utilized this capacity. She believes she can also hedge bonds into currencies other than a portfolio’s base currency when she expects doing so will add value. However, the legal department has not yet confirmed this interpretation. If the lawyers disagree, Winslow will be limited to either unhedged positions or hedging into each portfolio’s base currency.

Given the historically low rates available in the US, Euro, and UK markets, Winslow has decided to look for inter-market opportunities. With that in mind, she gathered observations about such trades from various sources. Winslow’s notes with respect to carry trades include these statements:

I. Carry trades may or may not involve a maturity mismatch. II. Carry trades require two yield curves with substantially different slopes. III. Inter-market carry trades just break even if both yield curves move to the forward rates.

Regarding inter-market trades in general her notes indicate: IV. Inter-market trades should be assessed based on currency-hedged returns. V. Anticipated changes in yield spreads are the primary driver of inter-market trades. VI. Whether a bond offers a relatively attractive return depends on both the portfolio’s base currency and the currency in which the bond is denominated.

Winslow thinks the Mexican and Greek markets may offer attractive opportunities to enhance returns. Yields in these markets are given in Exhibit 1, along with those for the base currencies of her portfolios. The Greek rates are for euro-denominated government bonds priced at par. In the other markets, the yields apply to par sovereign bonds as well as to the fixed side of swaps versus six-month Libor (i.e., swap spreads are zero in each market). The six-month Libor rates also represent the rates at which investors can borrow or lend in each currency. Winslow observes that the five-year Treasury-note and the five-year German government note are the cheapest to deliver against their respective futures contracts expiring in six months.

Winslow expects yields in the US, Euro, UK, and Greek markets to remain stable over the next six months. She expects Mexican yields to decline to 7.0% at all maturities. Meanwhile, she projects that the Mexican Peso will depreciate by 2% against the Euro, the US Dollar will depreciate by 1% against the Euro, and the British Pound will remain stable versus the Euro. Winslow believes bonds of the same maturity may be viewed as having the same duration for purposes of identifying the most attractive positions.

Based on these views, Winslow is considering three types of trades. First, she is looking at carry trades, with or without taking currency exposure, among her three base currency markets. Each such trade will involve extending duration (e.g., lend long/borrow short) in no more than one market. Second, assuming the legal department confirms her interpretation of permissible currency hedging, she wants to identify the most attractive five-year bond and currency exposure for each of her three portfolios from among the five markets shown in Exhibit 1. Third, she wants to identify the most attractive five-year bond and hedging decision for each portfolio if she is only allowed to hedge into the portfolio’s base currency.

Winslow’s firm has recently installed a test version of a new risk system which decomposes empirical yield curve movements into uncorrelated components and calculates the exposure of individual bonds as well as portfolios to each type of movement. The system’s current estimates for the three most important component movements are given in Exhibit 2. Unfortunately, the system did not indicate the relative importance among these three movements.

After loading the holdings of her US portfolio into the system, Winslow runs a report showing the impact of each risk component on the portfolio. The report is shown in Exhibit 3.


Among the carry trades available in the US, Euro, and UK markets, the highest expected return for the USD-denominated portfolio over the next 6 months is closest to:

选项:

A.

0.275%.

B.

0.85%.

C.

0.90%.

解释:

B is correct.

The highest potential return, 0.85%, reflects borrowing USD for 6 months and buying the UK 5-year bond. The carry component of the expected return is actually a loss of 0.15% [= (1.10% – 1.40%)/2], but this is more than offset by the 1% expected appreciation of GBP versus USD. A much higher carry component +0.90% = (1.95% – 0.15%)/2 could be obtained by borrowing for 6 months in EUR to buy the US 5-year note, but that advantage would be more than offset by the expected 1% loss from depreciation of the USD (long) against the Euro (short).

A is incorrect because a higher expected return of 0.85% can be obtained. This answer, +0.275% [= (1.95% – 1.40%)/2], is the highest carry available over the next 6 months within the US market itself (an intra-market carry trade).

C is incorrect. This answer (+0.90%) is the highest potential carry component of return but ignores the impact of currency exposure (being long the depreciating USD and short the appreciating Euro).

这题为什么不能借UK短投UK长,做carry trade,到期再换成美元计价。这样可以赚0.5*0.6+1%=1.3%的收益

1 个答案
已采纳答案

发亮_品职助教 · 2021年04月27日

嗨,爱思考的PZer你好:


这题为什么不能借UK短投UK长,做carry trade,到期再换成美元计价。这样可以赚0.5*0.6+1%=1.3%的收益


可以的,这道题之前也和何老师讨论过,在UK内部做Intra-market carry trade,最后再转换成USD也是OK的。反而这个收益还更高,但是答案没有这个选项。


从这道题的选项来看,似乎是限制了Carry trade里必须要有一个US利率,但是实际上可以在UK内部做Intra-market carry trade,最后转换成USD,这样的收益反而会更高,也符合题目的要求。


我自己认为是这道题在题干限制上有一点歧义,题干有一个对Carry trade的限定:Each such trade will involve extending duration (e.g., lend long/borrow short) in no more than one market.

Carry trade里面有2个利率头寸,然后上面这句限定说一个Carry trade最多能引入一个市场的利率头寸(In no more than one market)。


那这样的话,Carry trade的利率头寸里,必须要有一个是与Portfolio base currency一样的;

例如,这道题是USD-portfolio,本身Portfolio里面就已经有USD利率头寸了,那Carry trade里有一个USD的利率头寸就不算引入新的市场,然后另外一个利率可以是其他国家的利率,这样最多就引入了一个新的市场。例如,借USD、投UK,这就是只额外引入了一个UK的市场利率。

这么做符合题干的要求: Carry trade....will involve extending duration in no more than one market.

基于这样的题干要求,所以答案的3个选项里都有一个USD利率头寸。

为了符合In no more than one market的限定,在UK借短期、EUR投长期这种Carry trade,就不适合USD-Portfolio,因为这会额外引入2个市场(UK与EUR)。


题干这么限定,他的目的是限制Carry trade里面必须要有一个USD利率,所以才有了答案的3个选项。


但是,我们完全可以这么做:在UK内部,借短期、投长期,这也是只引入了一个新市场的利率;然后再转换成USD,这样的收益反而会更高。这样依然符合题干要求,且收益更高。但是答案没有考虑到这个情况。

所以这道题的题干有一点企业,理解Carry trade的原理即可。

----------------------------------------------
加油吧,让我们一起遇见更好的自己!