开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

穿平底鞋的洛希亚 · 2018年01月06日

请问C选项为什么不正确?问一道题:NO.PZ2016010802000016 [ CFA I ]

问题如下图:

    

选项:

A.

B.

C.

解释:



1 个答案

源_品职助教 · 2018年01月07日

通过题干表述我们只能判别说需求的增长是要超过供给的增长。但是判别不出收入的增长与供给的增长孰高孰低。


  • 1

    回答
  • 1

    关注
  • 357

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ2016010802000016 问题如下 A wireless phone manufacturer introcea next-generation phone threceivea high level of positive publicity. spite running severhigh speeproction assembly lines, the manufacturer is still falling short in meeting manfor the phone nine months after introction. Whiof the following statements is the most plausible explanation for the mansupply imbalance? A.The phone priis low relative to the equilibrium price. B.Competitors introcenext-generation phones a similprice. C.Consumer incomes grew faster ththe manufacturer anticipate A is correct.The situation scribeis one of excess manbecause, in orr for markets to clethe given level of quantity supplie the company woulneeto raise prices.考点均衡点A入选,当市场价格低于均衡价格时候,就会出现供给小于需求的情况。B不入选,竞争对手如果也以同样价格生产这种产品,那么部分消费者就会去买竞争对手的产品,那么该厂家生产产品供不应求的局面就应该得以缓解。C不入选,因为它不是最根本的原因。只要提价到均衡价格,不管消费者收入如何增长,需求一定就等于供给,不会存在需求短缺。 为什么c不对?消费者的消费水平被低估了不对吗?

2023-06-15 08:10 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2016010802000016 问题如下 A wireless phone manufacturer introcea next-generation phone threceivea high level of positive publicity. spite running severhigh speeproction assembly lines, the manufacturer is still falling short in meeting manfor the phone nine months after introction. Whiof the following statements is the most plausible explanation for the mansupply imbalance? A.The phone priis low relative to the equilibrium price. B.Competitors introcenext-generation phones a similprice. C.Consumer incomes grew faster ththe manufacturer anticipate A is correct.The situation scribeis one of excess manbecause, in orr for markets to clethe given level of quantity supplie the company woulneeto raise prices.考点均衡点A入选,当市场价格低于均衡价格时候,就会出现供给小于需求的情况。B不入选,竞争对手如果也以同样价格生产这种产品,那么部分消费者就会去买竞争对手的产品,那么该厂家生产产品供不应求的局面就应该得以缓解。C不入选,因为它不是最根本的原因。只要提价到均衡价格,不管消费者收入如何增长,需求一定就等于供给,不会存在需求短缺。 以前做過渠道銷售 2017年初 I出了個新品 當時公司年產量7000個 但是公司也沒預料到市場需求非常大 批發給代理商的貨一瞬間就賣完了(包括經銷商) 市場就出現了此產品零售價8,000(官價) 二級市場最高15000(炒價) 遠大於零售價的現象,請問要是按照這個題目的邏輯 需求大於供給( S) 爲何價格P會遠高於均衡價 還是題目的邏輯是 假設S 價格就應該被低估 適合long (相對于均衡價格)

2023-04-11 04:55 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2016010802000016 问题如下 A wireless phone manufacturer introcea next-generation phone threceivea high level of positive publicity. spite running severhigh speeproction assembly lines, the manufacturer is still falling short in meeting manfor the phone nine months after introction. Whiof the following statements is the most plausible explanation for the mansupply imbalance? A.The phone priis low relative to the equilibrium price. B.Competitors introcenext-generation phones a similprice. C.Consumer incomes grew faster ththe manufacturer anticipate A is correct.The situation scribeis one of excess manbecause, in orr for markets to clethe given level of quantity supplie the company woulneeto raise prices.考点均衡点A入选,当市场价格低于均衡价格时候,就会出现供给小于需求的情况。B不入选,竞争对手如果也以同样价格生产这种产品,那么部分消费者就会去买竞争对手的产品,那么该厂家生产产品供不应求的局面就应该得以缓解。C不入选,因为它不是最根本的原因。只要提价到均衡价格,不管消费者收入如何增长,需求一定就等于供给,不会存在需求短缺。 请问这道题的题干哪里体现了c中的均衡价格?

2022-07-12 20:25 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2016010802000016 Competitors introcenext-generation phones a similprice. Consumer incomes grew faster ththe manufacturer anticipate A is correct. The situation scribeis one of excess manbecause, in orr for markets to clethe given level of quantity supplie the company woulneeto raise prices. 考点均衡点 A入选,当市场价格低于均衡价格时候,就会出现供给小于需求的情况。 B不入选,竞争对手如果也以同样价格生产这种产品,那么部分消费者就会去买竞争对手的产品,那么该厂家生产产品供不应求的局面就应该得以缓解。 C不入选,因为它不是最根本的原因。只要提价到均衡价格,不管消费者收入如何增长,需求一定就等于供给,不会存在需求短缺。题干好长没太看懂,麻烦老师翻译一下,谢谢

2021-03-17 00:23 1 · 回答

请问这道题是哪里来的?原版书吗?很难理解其中逻辑啊。如果供不应求,提价不就能解决吗?其实A的问题,很容易解决啊。只有C提出的问题,真正造成供不应求啊啊。应该选C才对啊。

2020-04-27 20:36 1 · 回答