开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

我们 · 2021年03月18日

请问这里为什么是低估了?

NO.PZ2016070202000006

问题如下:

Tycoon Bank announced that there were eight days in the previous year for which losses exceeded the daily 99% VAR. As a result, concerns emerged about the accuracy of the VAR implementation. Assuming that there are 250 days in the year, which of the following statements is/are correct?

I. Using a two-tailed 99% confidence level z-score test, the current VAR implementation understates the actual risk in the bank's portfolio.

II. Using a two-tailed 99% confidence level z-score test, the current VAR implementation overstates the actual risk in the bank's portfolio.

III. The bank's exception rates for VAR may be inaccurate if the bank's portfolio changes incorporate the returns from low-risk but highly profitable intraday market making activities.

IV. If these eight exceptions all happened in the previous month, the model should be reexamined for faulty assumptions and invalid parameters.

选项:

A.

I and III

B.

I, III, and IV

C.

Ill only

D.

I, II, and IV

解释:

  1. The z-score gives 82.5250×0.01×0.99=3.5\frac{8-2.5}{\sqrt{250\times0.01\times0.99}}=3.5 This is too high (greater than 2.58), which leads to rejection of the null that the VAR model is well calibrated. Hence, VAR is too low and statement I. is correct. Statement II. is incorrect. However, this may be due to intraday trading, so III. is correct, too. Finally, if all eight exceptions occurred in the last month, there is bunching, and the model should be reexamined, so IV. is correct.
请问这里的VAR是如何判断出是被低估了呢?
1 个答案

小刘_品职助教 · 2021年03月18日

同学你好,

是因为判断出exception出现的次数太多了。

这个逻辑是这样的,VaR值过小,即门槛值过小,那么超过这个门槛值的数据的个数就会变大(变大成了8),导致z检验值过大。 反推也可以。

  • 1

    回答
  • 1

    关注
  • 576

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ2016070202000006问题如下 Tycoon Bank announceththere were eight ys in the previous yefor whilosses exceethe ily 99% VAR. a result, concerns emergeabout the accuraof the Vimplementation. Assuming ththere are 250 ys in the year, whiof the following statements is/are correct?I. Using a two-taile99% confinlevel z-score test, the current Vimplementation unrstates the acturisk in the bank's portfolio.II. Using a two-taile99% confinlevel z-score test, the current Vimplementation overstates the acturisk in the bank's portfolio.III. The bank's exception rates for Vminaccurate if the bank's portfolio changes incorporate the returns from low-risk but highly profitable intray market making activities.IV. If these eight exceptions all happenein the previous month, the mol shoulreexaminefor faulty assumptions aninvaliparameters. A.I anIIIB.I, III, anIVC.Ill onlyI, II, anIVThe z-score gives 8−2.5250×0.01×0.99=3.5\frac{8-2.5}{\sqrt{250\times0.01\times0.99}}=3.5250×0.01×0.99​8−2.5​=3.5 This is too high (greater th2.58), whilea to rejection of the null ththe Vmol is well calibrate Hence, Vis too low anstatement I. is correct. Statement II. is incorrect. However, this me to intray trang, so III. is correct, too. Finally, if all eight exceptions occurrein the last month, there is bunching, anthe mol shoulreexamine so IV. is correct.老师,III的意思是说,因为日内交易使头寸中少了很多风险小、收益高的资产,所以剩下头寸的亏损情况就变了,最终会出现很多exception么?

2022-04-05 01:00 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2016070202000006 截图中的公式是怎么算的,原理是怎样?

2021-11-08 11:10 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2016070202000006 能一下Ⅲ吗?有点没太明白

2021-08-30 13:23 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2016070202000006 当V天数越大,那算出来p-value 大 月会就拒绝,怎么是 overestimate ,明明是unrestimate ma

2021-05-11 19:05 1 · 回答