开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

zkii · 2021年03月09日

传统途径不也是用历史数据回归的吗?

NO.PZ2019122802000003

问题如下:

An committee has historically used a traditional approach to define the opportunity set based on distinct macroeconomic regimes, and one analyst proposes that a risk-based approach might be a better method. Although the traditional approach is relatively powerful for its ability to handle liquidity and manager selection issues compared to a risk-based approach, there are a number of limitations associated with the existing approach. Which of the following limitation of the existing approach used by the committee to define the opportunity set?

选项:

A.

is difficult to communicate.

B.

overestimates the portfolio diversification.

C.

is sensitive to the historical look-back period.

解释:

B is correct.

A traditional approach has been used to define the opportunity set based on different macroeconomic conditions. The primary limitations of traditional approaches are that they overestimate the portfolio diversification and obscure the primary drivers of risk.

老师我想问一下,MVO 和 risk factor based approach 不都是利用历史数据回归得到的吗?

1 个答案
已采纳答案

韩韩_品职助教 · 2021年03月09日

嗨,爱思考的PZer你好:


同学你好,你看传统方法定义下的资产类别,都是股票/债券这样的大类资产,他不是用历史数据回归得到的,它是根据资产的流动性和不同经济状况下,资产的表现来推荐适合的投资产品,假设你想要一个流动性非常好的,那么你只能在股票当中来选择,而risk factor是从收益的来源角度出发,如果你想要一个久期带来的收益,那么你可能需要通过government bond来投资。两者的出发点不同。

----------------------------------------------
虽然现在很辛苦,但努力过的感觉真的很好,加油!

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 554

    浏览
相关问题

李老师 这里的题目英文描述我有点问题吧 问的应该是传统方法的局限性 不是风险因子方法的

2024-10-16 10:36 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2019122802000003 问题如下 committee hhistorically usea trationapproato fine the opportunity set baseon stinmacroeconomic regimes, anone analyst proposes tha risk-baseapproamight a better metho Although the trationapproais relatively powerful for its ability to hane liquity anmanager selection issues compareto a risk-baseapproach, there are a number of limitations associatewith the existing approach. Whiof the following limitation of the existing approausethe committee to fine the opportunity set? A.is fficult to communicate. B.overestimates the portfolio versification. C.is sensitive to the historiclook-baperio B is correct.A trationapproahbeen useto fine the opportunity set baseon fferent macroeconomic contions. The primary limitations of trationapproaches are ththey overestimate the portfolio versification anobscure the primary ivers of risk.这是fining oppotunity set 的知识点,即另类投资产品的投资类别分类,主要有两类分类方法一类就是trationapproach, 另外一类就是risk-baseapproach. Tration是根据宏观的条件/流动性来看在何种条件下适合投资怎么样的产品,risk-base根据回归的方法来定义资产类别的。之所以说trationapproach会高估分散化的效果,是因为trationapproach只是形式上做到了分散化,但实际上不同的产品之间可能是有关联的,并没有做到实质上的分散化,比如股票和大宗商品之间,他们可能都会收到相同的利率,宏观经济的因素的影响。Risk-base法是从风险的最终来源角度来回归的,用各个因子把风险的敏感系数回归出来,既然是回归,那么就是基于历史数据,所以对于选择的time-perio常敏感,不同的time-perio能会导致不同的回归系数。这是risk-baseapproach的缺点。C错在是risk fbase是sensitive to the historiclook-baperio 为啥risk-base是sensitive to the historiclook-baperio

2022-08-03 11:15 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2019122802000003 overestimates the portfolio versification. is sensitive to the historiclook-baperio B is correct. A trationapproahbeen useto fine the opportunity set baseon fferent macroeconomic contions. The primary limitations of trationapproaches are ththey overestimate the portfolio versification anobscure the primary ivers of risk. c错在哪里了,mvo的方法不就是对历史数据敏感嘛?

2021-05-23 11:58 1 · 回答

C为什么不对

2020-09-17 17:12 1 · 回答