开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

三言午寺 · 2021年02月08日

不是说审计师的目的是“要合理的确保财务报表在很大概率上是没有重大错误,欺诈或非法行为的”么?那为什么不包括舞弊?这不就是欺诈和重大错误么?还是审计师只查合不合规,最终数据能否对上?

NO.PZ2016012102000166

问题如下:

Which of the following about the effectiveness of auditing in ensuring financial reporting quality is correct?

选项:

A.

The audits' objective is not detecting fraud. This is a limitation on auditing effectiveness.

B.

Audit opinions are not required to be obtained by public firms.

C.

Auditors may only issue opinions and do not explain reasons. The opions that auditors issued only have qualified or unqualified.

解释:

A is correct.

The financial statements should be presented fairly. This is the objective of audits. Thus, auditors must be provide reasonable assurance this objective can reached. In some circumstances, such as a company is engaging in accounting fraud, auditors may be deceived by the company, so they are difficult to find accounting fraud. In most countries, regulators require companys trading in public to have independent auditors' opinion on their financial statements. Auditors may issue a qualified opinion,  unqualified opinion, disclaimer of opinion, and adverse opinion.

不是说审计师的目的是“要合理的确保财务报表在很大概率上是没有重大错误,欺诈或非法行为的”么?那为什么不包括舞弊?这不就是欺诈和重大错误么?还是审计师只查合不合规,最终数据能否对上?

1 个答案

纠纠_品职答疑助手 · 2021年02月09日

嗨,从没放弃的小努力你好:


审计的任务是获取合理的审计证据,合理保证财报不存在重大错报。

但是审计并不能完全保证自己不被骗,有可能审计出来没有问题,但是公司做了整套假账,所以审计查不出来,也是有这种可能性的,这就不是审计的责任了。


-------------------------------
就算太阳没有迎着我们而来,我们正在朝着它而去,加油!