问题如下图：
不应该选c吗？？老师
选项：
A. 
B. 
C. 
解释：
Debrah_品职答疑助手 · 2020年11月13日
嗨，爱思考的PZer你好：
根据题目，这家brokerage firm为Jones Corporation员工利润分项账户提供的是：Lowest commissions for trades and provides best execution，也就是提供的是"价低质优"的交易（Lowest price but best execution）
Farnsworth同学经过Due dilligence发现，Jones任命的这个董事，对公司长远的发展有利，所以他投了同意票，这里没有违反任何准则。
看起来，经纪人给Farnsworth同学返还了一些信息，但注意，这些信息是免费的，因为交易本身就是Lowest price，Best execution，经纪人提供的已经是最低价的交易了，所以本质上员工利润分项账户并没有为经纪人提供的Tax-free investment information付出任何成本，所以也不违反。
-------------------------------努力的时光都是限量版，加油！
NO.PZ2016032801000014 问题如下 One of the scretionary accounts manageFarnsworth is the Jones Corporation employee profit-sharing plan. Jones, the company presint, recently askeFarnsworth to vote the shares in the profit-sharing plin favor of the slate of rectors nominateJones Corporation anagainst the rectors sponsorea ssint stockholr group. Farnsworth es not want to lose this account because he rects all the account’s tras to a brokerage firm thprovis Farnsworth with useful information about tax-free investments. Although this information is not of value in managing the Jones Corporation account, it es help in managing severother accounts. The brokerage firm proving this information also offers the lowest commissions for tras anprovis best execution. Farnsworth investigates the rector issue, conclus ththe management nominateslate is better for the long-run performanof the company ththe ssint group’s slate, anvotes accorngly. Farnsworth: A.Violatethe Stanr in voting the shares in the manner requesteJones but not in recting tras to the brokerage firm. B.not violate the Stanr in voting the shares in the manner requesteJones or in recting tras to the brokerage firm. C.Violatethe Stanr in recting tras to the brokerage firm but not in voting the shares requesteJones. B is correct.This question relates to StanrIII(–Loyalty, Prunce, anCare — specifically, a member’s or cante’s responsibility for voting proxies anthe use of client brokerage. Accorng to the facts statein the question, Farnsworth not violate StanrIII(A). Although the company presint askeFarnsworth to vote the shares of the Jones Corporation profit-sharing pla certain way, Farnsworth investigatethe issue anconclu inpenntly, the best wto vote. Therefore, even though his cision coinciwith the wishes of the company presint, Farnsworth is not in violation of his responsibility to loyanto provi care to his clients. In this case, the participants anthe beneficiaries of the profit-sharing plare the clients, not the company’s management. HFarnsworth not investigatethe issue or hhe yielto the presint’s wishes anvotefor a slate of rectors thhe hterminewnot in the best interest of the company, Farnsworth woulhave violatehis responsibilities to the beneficiaries of the plan. In aition, because the brokerage firm provis the lowest commissions anbest execution for securities transactions, Farnsworth hmet his obligations to the client in using this brokerage firm. It es not matter ththe brokerage firm also provis researinformation this not useful for the account generating the commission because Farnsworth is not paying extra money of the client’s for thinformation. 我理解的这两件事儿一点也不冲突啊，那为什么原文说“Farnsworth es not want to lose this account because he rects all the account’s tras to a brokerage firm thprovis Farnsworth with useful information about tax-free investments. ”搞得好像必须要二选一一样？
NO.PZ2016032801000014问题如下One of the scretionary accounts manageFarnsworth is the Jones Corporation employee profit-sharing plan. Jones, the company presint, recently askeFarnsworth to vote the shares in the profit-sharing plin favor of the slate of rectors nominateJones Corporation anagainst the rectors sponsorea ssint stockholr group. Farnsworth es not want to lose this account because he rects all the account’s tras to a brokerage firm thprovis Farnsworth with useful information about tax-free investments. Although this information is not of value in managing the Jones Corporation account, it es help in managing severother accounts. The brokerage firm proving this information also offers the lowest commissions for tras anprovis best execution. Farnsworth investigates the rector issue, conclus ththe management nominateslate is better for the long-run performanof the company ththe ssint group’s slate, anvotes accorngly. Farnsworth: A.Violatethe Stanr in voting the shares in the manner requesteJones but not in recting tras to the brokerage firm. B.not violate the Stanr in voting the shares in the manner requesteJones or in recting tras to the brokerage firm. C.Violatethe Stanr in recting tras to the brokerage firm but not in voting the shares requesteJones. B is correct.This question relates to StanrIII(–Loyalty, Prunce, anCare — specifically, a member’s or cante’s responsibility for voting proxies anthe use of client brokerage. Accorng to the facts statein the question, Farnsworth not violate StanrIII(A). Although the company presint askeFarnsworth to vote the shares of the Jones Corporation profit-sharing pla certain way, Farnsworth investigatethe issue anconclu inpenntly, the best wto vote. Therefore, even though his cision coinciwith the wishes of the company presint, Farnsworth is not in violation of his responsibility to loyanto provi care to his clients. In this case, the participants anthe beneficiaries of the profit-sharing plare the clients, not the company’s management. HFarnsworth not investigatethe issue or hhe yielto the presint’s wishes anvotefor a slate of rectors thhe hterminewnot in the best interest of the company, Farnsworth woulhave violatehis responsibilities to the beneficiaries of the plan. In aition, because the brokerage firm provis the lowest commissions anbest execution for securities transactions, Farnsworth hmet his obligations to the client in using this brokerage firm. It es not matter ththe brokerage firm also provis researinformation this not useful for the account generating the commission because Farnsworth is not paying extra money of the client’s for thinformation.他投票和调查好像有先后关系，先投票后调查，和何璇老师说的，不要看后面的和观点，看事实，他投票的时候就是不想lose这单交易。
NO.PZ2016032801000014问题如下One of the scretionary accounts manageFarnsworth is the Jones Corporation employee profit-sharing plan. Jones, the company presint, recently askeFarnsworth to vote the shares in the profit-sharing plin favor of the slate of rectors nominateJones Corporation anagainst the rectors sponsorea ssint stockholr group. Farnsworth es not want to lose this account because he rects all the account’s tras to a brokerage firm thprovis Farnsworth with useful information about tax-free investments. Although this information is not of value in managing the Jones Corporation account, it es help in managing severother accounts. The brokerage firm proving this information also offers the lowest commissions for tras anprovis best execution. Farnsworth investigates the rector issue, conclus ththe management nominateslate is better for the long-run performanof the company ththe ssint group’s slate, anvotes accorngly. Farnsworth: A.Violatethe Stanr in voting the shares in the manner requesteJones but not in recting tras to the brokerage firm. B.not violate the Stanr in voting the shares in the manner requesteJones or in recting tras to the brokerage firm. C.Violatethe Stanr in recting tras to the brokerage firm but not in voting the shares requesteJones. B is correct.This question relates to StanrIII(–Loyalty, Prunce, anCare — specifically, a member’s or cante’s responsibility for voting proxies anthe use of client brokerage. Accorng to the facts statein the question, Farnsworth not violate StanrIII(A). Although the company presint askeFarnsworth to vote the shares of the Jones Corporation profit-sharing pla certain way, Farnsworth investigatethe issue anconclu inpenntly, the best wto vote. Therefore, even though his cision coinciwith the wishes of the company presint, Farnsworth is not in violation of his responsibility to loyanto provi care to his clients. In this case, the participants anthe beneficiaries of the profit-sharing plare the clients, not the company’s management. HFarnsworth not investigatethe issue or hhe yielto the presint’s wishes anvotefor a slate of rectors thhe hterminewnot in the best interest of the company, Farnsworth woulhave violatehis responsibilities to the beneficiaries of the plan. In aition, because the brokerage firm provis the lowest commissions anbest execution for securities transactions, Farnsworth hmet his obligations to the client in using this brokerage firm. It es not matter ththe brokerage firm also provis researinformation this not useful for the account generating the commission because Farnsworth is not paying extra money of the client’s for thinformation.在获取服务是最低价和最好execution情况下，这里获取的资源是不是直接有利于客户才算不违反？如果免费获取的资源不是直接利于客户而是对自己个人有利，是不是就算违反了？
NO.PZ2016032801000014 老师，这里面两个问题。 一个是投票的问题，违反在何处呢？ 另一个是拿到软性好处的问题，又有何违反呢？