开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

leozhenlin · 2020年10月14日

问一道题:NO.PZ2018062009000031

问题如下:

Cliff was invited to give a speech at an important financial conference, the host of the event is an investment manager who recently carrys on business with Cliff's firm. To show high respect for the speakers, the host firm provided Cliff with free conference registration for his wife and arranged for fancy seafood dinner at the local lavish restaurant after the conference. Which of the following statements is the most appropriate?

选项:

A.

Cliff can not accept the invitation because the free conference registration for his wife and the seafood dinner will violate Standard I(B).

B.

Cliff can not accept the invitation because the seafood dinner will violate Standard I(B).

C.

Cliff can accept the invitation thoroughly.

解释:

A is correct.

Based on Standard I(B) Independence and Objectivity, members and candidates must maintain their independence and objectivity. The free conference registration for Cliff's wife and the fancy seafood dinner do not have direct relation with the speaking engagement, and can be regarded as inducements that affect his independence and objectivity. If Cliff accepts the invitation, he will violate Standard I(B).

老师好,我想问一下A选项和B选项,我觉得都对啊,一定要区分出妻子的事儿么,遇到这么情况怎么处理

1 个答案

Debrah_品职答疑助手 · 2020年10月15日

嗨,爱思考的PZer你好:


如果不是因为Cliff基金经理的身份,主办方也不可能单独邀请Cliff的妻子。所以选项B说的不完全。如果Cliff不参加,而只是他妻子参加,也是违反了准则。根据I(B)的独立性和客观性,Cliff及妻子夫出席海鲜晚餐与演讲约定没有直接关系,可以看作是影响其独立性和客观性的诱因。如果Cliff及妻子接受邀请,他将违反I(B)。


-------------------------------
就算太阳没有迎着我们而来,我们正在朝着它而去,加油!