问题如下：
Albert and Tye, who recently started their own investment advisory business, have registered to take the Level III CFA examination. Albert’s business card reads, "Judy Albert, CFA Level II." Tye has not put anything about the CFA designation on his business card, but promotional material that he designed for the business describes the CFA requirements and indicates that Tye participates in the CFA Program and has completed Levels I and II. According to the Standards:
选项：
A.Albert has violated the Standards, but Tye has not.
B.Tye has violated the Standards, but Albert has not.
C.Both Albert and Tye have violated the Standards.
解释：
A is correct.
Standard VII(B) –Reference to CFA Institute, the CFA Designation, and the CFA Program is the subject of this question. The reference on Albert’s business card implies that there is a "CFA Level II" designation; Tye merely indicates in promotional material that he is participating in the CFA Program and has completed Levels I and II. Candidates may not imply that there is some sort of partial designation earned after passing a level of the CFA exam. Therefore, Albert has violated Standard VII(B). Candidates may communicate that they are participating in the CFA Program, however, and may state the levels that they have completed. Therefore, Tye has not violated Standard VII(B).
请问老师文中这句话“but promotional material that he designed for the business describes the CFA requirements”，这个不算违反规定吗？
这句话的意思是不是把公司和cfa联系在一起了，或者是公司投资方式和gips相关？
