开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

Aaabby · 2020年08月28日

问一道题:NO.PZ201604030300004504

* 问题详情,请 查看题干

问题如下:

4. Are Khadri’s statements in the quarterly newsletter consistent with CFA Institute Standards?

选项:

A.

Yes.

B.

No, because Statement 1 is opinion, not fact.

C.

No, because Statement 2 is opinion, not fact.

解释:

B is correct.

Standard V(B) —Communication with Clients and Prospective Clients requires the member or candidate to separate and distinguish "facts from opinions" in the presentation of analyses and investment recommendations. Statement 1 in the newsletter states that "China’s pegging of the yuan to the US dollar will end within the next 12 months which will lead to the yuan increasing in value by more than 40%, supporting our over-weighting of Chinese-related stocks in the portfolio." Khadri does not clearly differentiate between opinion and fact. The statement about the future of oil pricing is not as questionable because Khadri uses the term "should" which helps clients understand that this is an opinion and not a certainty. Members may communicate opinions, estimates, and assumptions about future values and possible events but they must take care to differentiate fact from opinion.

可以讲一下这个题的两个选项么?

1 个答案

王暄_品职助教 · 2020年08月29日

嗨,从没放弃的小努力你好:


Statement 1: 人民币相对于美元的固定汇率制度将在12个月内结束,将会(will)导致人民币升值的幅度大于40%。支持了我们在基金中重仓人民币相关股票的行为。

  • 这个Statement中,用了will这个词。这是混淆了事实和观点的,因为固定汇率制度还没结束,人民币是否增值超过40%也暂时未知,但Statement却用了will,所以错误。

Statement 2:由于全球范围内持续的政治不稳定,应该(should)会导致油价升值至3年均值以上,这个支持了我们的重仓小盘能源股的建议。

  • 这个Statement用了should,这个就很好的表现出只是基金经理的观点,而非事实。所以这个Statement没有混淆事实和观点。

-------------------------------
加油吧,让我们一起遇见更好的自己!


  • 1

    回答
  • 1

    关注
  • 927

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ201604030300004504问题如下4. Are Khai’s statements in the quarterly newsletter consistent with CFA Institute Stanr?A.Yes.B.No, because Statement 1 is opinion, not fact.C.No, because Statement 2 is opinion, not fact.B is correct.StanrV(—Communication with Clients anProspective Clients requires the member or cante to separate anstinguish \"facts from opinions\" in the presentation of analyses aninvestment recommentions. Statement 1 in the newsletter states th\"China’s pegging of the yuto the US llwill enwithin the next 12 months whiwill leto the yuincreasing in value more th40%, supporting our over-weighting of Chinese-relatestocks in the portfolio.\" Khai es not clearly fferentiate between opinion anfact. The statement about the future of oil pricing is not questionable because Khai uses the term \"shoul" whihelps clients unrstanththis is opinion annot a certainty. Members mcommunicate opinions, estimates, anassumptions about future values anpossible events but they must take care to fferentiate fafrom opinion.Statement 1: 人民币相对于美元的固定汇率制度将在12个月内结束,将会(will)导致人民币升值的幅度大于40%。支持了我们在基金中重仓人民币相关股票的行为。这个Statement中,用了will这个词。这是混淆了事实和观点的,因为固定汇率制度还没结束,人民币是否增值超过40%也暂时未知,但Statement却用了will,所以错误。这道题用will会混淆,请问第一题用模型simulate果有信心will获得高收益就不是混淆opinion和fact?

2022-06-09 14:50 1 · 回答