开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)｜3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

返回

金融民工阿聪 · 2020年08月16日

问一道题：NO.PZ2016082405000057

  1. FRM II
  2. Credit Risk Measurement And Management

问题如下：

The benefits of multilateral netting versus bilateral netting are dependent on a number of factors. Which of the following factors most strongly suggest the need for fewer central counterparties (CCPs) in a global multilateral netting framework?

选项：

A.

Reduction of risk exposures.

B.

Differences in liquidity for asset classes.

C.

Jurisdictional fragmentation.

D.

Reduction in severe systemic risk.

解释：

A One of the biggest benefits of multilateral netting is the reduction of risk exposures. With fewer CCPs a greater degree of risk reduction is realized due to lower dependencies within and across derivative products. This risk reduction helps mitigate systemic risk. Differences in asset classes related to liquidity would suggest more CCPs are needed to concentrate in specific asset classes. Jurisdictional fragmentation in a global market requires local clearing and thus more CCPs. A monopolistic framework with only a few CCPs could lead to severe systemic risk, in the event that margins and collateral are not sufficient to cover losses.

这里的B是什么意思，没看懂

添加评论
1 个答案

品职答疑小助手雍 · 2020年08月16日

嗨，爱思考的PZer你好：


就是资产的种类比较多，不好调和

这种情况会鼓励更多的CCP出现去专门针对不同的资产类别。

题目问的那种情况会使CCP更few，所以B错。


-------------------------------
虽然现在很辛苦，但努力过的感觉真的很好，加油！


  • 1

    回答

  • 0

    关注

  • 314

    浏览
相关问题

fferences in liquity for asset classes. Jurisctionfragmentation. Rection in severe systemic risk. A One of the biggest benefits of multilaternetting is the rection of risk exposures. With fewer CCPs a greater gree of risk rection is realizee to lower penncies within anacross rivative procts. This risk rection helps mitigate systemic risk. fferences in asset classes relateto liquity woulsuggest more CCPs are neeto concentrate in specific asset classes. Jurisctionfragmentation in a globmarket requires locclearing anthus more CCPs. A monopolistic framework with only a few CCPs coulleto severe systemic risk, in the event thmargins ancollaterare not sufficient to cover losses. 关于如果很多的ccp引起恶性竞争，不是更容易引发系统性风险吗？所以，应该是倾向于更少的CCP吧。

2020-06-01 15:03 1 · 回答

The benefits of multilaternetting versus bilaternetting are pennt on a number of factors. Whiof the following factors most strongly suggest the neefor fewer centrcounterparties (CCPs) in a globmultilaternetting framework? Rection of risk exposures. fferences in liquity for asset classes. Jurisctionfragmentation. Rection in severe systemic risk. A One of the biggest benefits of multilaternetting is the rection of risk exposures. With fewer CCPs a greater gree of risk rection is realizee to lower penncies within anacross rivative procts. This risk rection helps mitigate systemic risk. fferences in asset classes relateto liquity woulsuggest more CCPs are neeto concentrate in specific asset classes. Jurisctionfragmentation in a globmarket requires locclearing anthus more CCPs. A monopolistic framework with only a few CCPs coulleto severe systemic risk, in the event thmargins ancollaterare not sufficient to cover losses. fewer 讲道理是表示更少的意思吧，这不完全相反了吗？

2020-04-12 21:14 2 · 回答

fferences in liquity for asset classes. Jurisctionfragmentation. Rection in severe systemic risk. A One of the biggest benefits of multilaternetting is the rection of risk exposures. With fewer CCPs a greater gree of risk rection is realizee to lower penncies within anacross rivative procts. This risk rection helps mitigate systemic risk. fferences in asset classes relateto liquity woulsuggest more CCPs are neeto concentrate in specific asset classes. Jurisctionfragmentation in a globmarket requires locclearing anthus more CCPs. A monopolistic framework with only a few CCPs coulleto severe systemic risk, in the event thmargins ancollaterare not sufficient to cover losses. 请问A，fewer C带来的lower penncies within anacross rivative procts 如何理解呢

2020-03-31 19:28 1 · 回答

The benefits of multilaternetting versus bilaternetting are pennt on a number of factors. Whiof the following factors most strongly suggest the neefor fewer centrcounterparties (CCPs) in a globmultilaternetting framework? Rection of risk exposures. fferences in liquity for asset classes. Jurisctionfragmentation. Rection in severe systemic risk. A One of the biggest benefits of multilaternetting is the rection of risk exposures. With fewer CCPs a greater gree of risk rection is realizee to lower penncies within anacross rivative procts. This risk rection helps mitigate systemic risk. fferences in asset classes relateto liquity woulsuggest more CCPs are neeto concentrate in specific asset classes. Jurisctionfragmentation in a globmarket requires locclearing anthus more CCPs. A monopolistic framework with only a few CCPs coulleto severe systemic risk, in the event thmargins ancollaterare not sufficient to cover losses. 请问C是什么意思？

2020-03-17 23:17 1 · 回答