开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

472121 · 2020年07月23日

问一道题:NO.PZ201512300100000407

* 问题详情,请 查看题干

问题如下:

7. A potential weakness of Johansson’s approach to estimating the required return on equity for Twin Industries is that the return estimate:

选项:

A.

does not include a size premium.

B.

may overstate potential returns over the long-term.

C.

does not consider systematic risk arising from the economics of the industry.

解释:

A is correct.

Johansson intends to estimate a required return on equity using a modified CAPM approach. Twin Industries is stated to be smaller than the chosen proxy benchmark being used and there is no size premium adjustment in the CAPM framework; the framework adjusts the beta for leverage differences but this does not adjust for firm size differences. The build-up method may be more appropriate as it includes the equity risk premium and one or more additional premia, often based on factors such as size and perceived company-specific risk.

老师你好 ,题干中说的是”Johansson’s approach“,那他都是求beta的,给我的感觉就是CAPM approach;

即便是私人企业,又怎么判断到build-up approach上去呢,怎么样避过“求beta,用capm”这个坑呢?


1 个答案

Debrah_品职答疑助手 · 2020年07月24日

同学你好,其实这个是对题目考察知识点的判断问题。一般情况下,只要题干出现非上市公司和上市公司的对比,那么规模一定是一个显著差别,然后就会考虑用build-up method。题目做的多了,就会有感觉了。关于build up method请看下面讲义,它特别适用于非上市公司计算要求回报率。