开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)｜3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

返回

陈Shelly · 2020年07月17日

问一道题：NO.PZ2020012201000007

  1. CFA III
  2. Capital Market Expectations

问题如下：

Alena,CFA, was updating her firm’s projections for US equity returns.If she believed that in the long run that the US labor input would grow by 0.9% perannum and labor productivity by 1.5%, that inflation would be 2.1%, that the dividend yield would be 2.25%, and that there would be no further growth in P/E, what is likely to have been her baseline projection for continuously compounded long-term US equity returns?

选项：

A.

6.75%

B.

5.5%

C.

5.85%

解释：

A is correct

解释：

在长期，一国股票市场的增长率等于该国GDP的增长率(本题P/E增长率为0也证实了这一点)。那么本题就等于计算该国GDP的增长率。

Her baseline projection is likely to have been 6.75% = 0.9% + 1.5% + 2.1% + 2.25%

依照公式可得：. 6.75% = 0.9% + 1.5% + 2.1% + 2.25%

看了大家的问题之后，这道题我是这样总结的，但是还有一点问题。

首先这道题结合了两个知识点GDP的composition和GK模型（equity earning的composition）。

1、%△GDP=labor productivity+labor force（题目中的labor input）=0.9%+1.5%=2.4%

2、GK model：E（Re）= D/P+%△E-%S+%P/E = 2.25%+%△E-0+0 = 2.25%+%△GDP+%△E/GDP

在这里%△GDP+%△E/GDP就是%△E，我理解%△E是nominal return rate包含inflation rate，可是这个inflation rate没有直接包含在刚刚计算的%△GDP中吗？%△E/GDP也等于0吗？

2、GK model：E（Re）= D/P+%△E-%S+%P/E = 2.25%+%△E-0+0 = 2.25%+%△GDP+%△E/GDP 

添加评论
2 个答案

源_品职助教 · 2020年09月15日

可以像你说的这么去理解。

源_品职助教 · 2020年07月19日

嗨，从没放弃的小努力你好：


一般看到这类题目，需要看一下题目有没有单独给出 inflation rate 数据，多数情况是给了，给了就说明没有包含在 %△GDP中 ，那就要加上。如果没给，那就认为包含了，就不要管了。

%△E/GDP 在长期来看应该等于0，如果题目没有相关数据， 默认为0

 


-------------------------------
加油吧，让我们一起遇见更好的自己！


每天都想出坑的铁头娃 · 2020年09月15日

这个题目书上给的第一列是real GDP growth，所以估计这里算的GDP就都是没有调整GDP的，是这么个思路么？其实我做的时候也在纠结这个inflation到底加还是不加

  • 2

    回答

  • 3

    关注

  • 913

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ2020012201000007 问题如下 Alena,CFwupting her firm’s projections for US equity returns.If she believethin the long run ththe US labor input woulgrow 0.9% perannum anlabor proctivity 1.5%, thinflation woul2.1%, ththe vinyielwoul2.25%, anththere woulno further growth in P/E, whis likely to have been her baseline projection for continuously compounlong-term US equity returns? 6.75% B.5.5% C.5.85% A is correct在长期，一国股票市场的CAPITAPPRECIATION的增长率等于该国G的增长率(本题P/E增长率为0也证实了这一点)。那么本题CAPITAPPRECIATION就等于计算该国G的增长率。此后再加上股息增长率就可以得到股权市场的增长率。Her baseline projection is likely to have been 6.75% = 0.9% + 1.5% + 2.1% + 2.25%依照公式可得. 6.75% = 0.9% + 1.5% + 2.1% + 2.25% “If she believethin the long run ththe US labor input woulgrow 0.9% perannum anlabor proctivity 1.5%, thinflation woul2.1%, ”这句话虽然给了我们inflantion的条件，但是并没有说0.9%+1.5%算出来的就是实际G啊？在考试中我们要怎么判断？是不是如给了inflantion的数字，我们就要用上？

2024-10-29 18:07 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2020012201000007 问题如下 Alena,CFwupting her firm’s projections for US equity returns.If she believethin the long run ththe US labor input woulgrow 0.9% perannum anlabor proctivity 1.5%, thinflation woul2.1%, ththe vinyielwoul2.25%, anththere woulno further growth in P/E, whis likely to have been her baseline projection for continuously compounlong-term US equity returns? 6.75% B.5.5% C.5.85% A is correct在长期，一国股票市场的CAPITAPPRECIATION的增长率等于该国G的增长率(本题P/E增长率为0也证实了这一点)。那么本题CAPITAPPRECIATION就等于计算该国G的增长率。此后再加上股息增长率就可以得到股权市场的增长率。Her baseline projection is likely to have been 6.75% = 0.9% + 1.5% + 2.1% + 2.25%依照公式可得. 6.75% = 0.9% + 1.5% + 2.1% + 2.25% 该公式资本增值方面应该是三方面，G增长率、E/G增长率、P/E增长率，长期来看后两者为0，这样理解对吗？该题未提到E/G增长率，是否因为问的是长期股票收益率预测，所以就默认该项为0了？但题目又提了不考虑P/E增长率

2024-10-22 21:50 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2020012201000007问题如下Alena,CFwupting her firm’s projections for US equity returns.If she believethin the long run ththe US labor input woulgrow 0.9% perannum anlabor proctivity 1.5%, thinflation woul2.1%, ththe vinyielwoul2.25%, anththere woulno further growth in P/E, whis likely to have been her baseline projection for continuously compounlong-term US equity returns?6.75% B.5.5%C.5.85% A is correct在长期，一国股票市场的CAPITAPPRECIATION的增长率等于该国G的增长率(本题P/E增长率为0也证实了这一点)。那么本题CAPITAPPRECIATION就等于计算该国G的增长率。此后再加上股息增长率就可以得到股权市场的增长率。Her baseline projection is likely to have been 6.75% = 0.9% + 1.5% + 2.1% + 2.25%依照公式可得. 6.75% = 0.9% + 1.5% + 2.1% + 2.25% rt 这道题用到的是哪个公式，可不可以用公式的写出计算过程，是哪个知识点

2024-07-27 11:20 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2020012201000007 问题如下 Alena,CFwupting her firm’s projections for US equity returns.If she believethin the long run ththe US labor input woulgrow 0.9% perannum anlabor proctivity 1.5%, thinflation woul2.1%, ththe vinyielwoul2.25%, anththere woulno further growth in P/E, whis likely to have been her baseline projection for continuously compounlong-term US equity returns? 6.75% B.5.5% C.5.85% A is correct在长期，一国股票市场的CAPITAPPRECIATION的增长率等于该国G的增长率(本题P/E增长率为0也证实了这一点)。那么本题CAPITAPPRECIATION就等于计算该国G的增长率。此后再加上股息增长率就可以得到股权市场的增长率。Her baseline projection is likely to have been 6.75% = 0.9% + 1.5% + 2.1% + 2.25%依照公式可得. 6.75% = 0.9% + 1.5% + 2.1% + 2.25% 请问这里continuously compounlong-term US equity returns中的continuously compoun现在哪里？和直接问long-term US equity returns的求解思路有没有差别？

2024-07-22 10:43 2 · 回答

解析错误 该题不仅仅计算了该国G的长期增长率，还需要计算v.yile股票市场收益率不止 capitappreciation, 还有v.增长率，所以加了一个2.25%

2024-06-28 16:44 1 · 回答