问题如下：
Paul suggests the following step which would be repeated every quarter.
Step 1 We apply ML techniques to a model including fundamental and technical variables (features) to predict next quarter’s return for each of the 100 stocks currently in our portfolio. Then, the 20 stocks with the lowest estimated return are identified for replacement.
Assuming regularization is utilized in the machine learning technique used for executing Step 1, which of the following ML models would be least appropriate:
选项：
A.Regression tree with pruning
LASSO with lambda (λ) equal to 0
LASSO with lambda (λ) between 0.5 and 1
解释：
B is correct. It is least appropriate because with LASSO, when λ = 0 the penalty (i.e., regularization) term reduces to zero, so there is no regularization and the regression is equivalent to an ordinary least squares (OLS) regression.
A is incorrect. With Classification and Regression Trees (CART), one way that regularization can be implemented is via pruning which will reduce the size of the regression tree—sections that provide little explanatory power are pruned (i.e., removed).
C is incorrect. With LASSO, when λ is between 0.5 and 1 the relatively large penalty (i.e., regularization) term requires that a feature makes a sufficient contribution to model fit to offset the penalty from including it in the model.
老师好， 这题是在问以下哪一个是最不合适的， 也就是错误最多的一款是哪个， 是吗？ 那么，选项A， pruning是CART里的一种regularization方法 根本和regression 无关， 不是错的比B 多吗?谢谢。或者A , B 都是一半对一半错？
