开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)｜3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

返回

徐威廉 · 2020年03月30日

问一道题：NO.PZ201601200500000804 第4小题 [ CFA II ]

  1. CFA II
  2. Corporate Issuers

* 问题详情，请 查看题干

问题如下：

4. What is the NPV (C$ millions) of the optimal set of investment decisions for Society Services including the expansion option?

选项：

A.

6.34.

B.

12.68.

C.

31.03.

解释：

B is correct.

Assume we are at time = 1. The NPV of the expansion (at time 1) if demand is "high" is

NPV=−190+∑t=19401.10t=C$40.361millionNPV=-190+\sum_{t=1}^9\frac{40}{1.10^t}=C\$40.361million

The NPV of the expansion (at time 1) if demand is "low" is

NPV=−190+∑t=19201.10t=‐C$74.820millionNPV=-190+\sum_{t=1}^9\frac{20}{1.10^t}=‐C\$74.820million

The optimal decision is to expand if demand is "high" and not expand if "low."

Because the expansion option is exercised only when its value is positive, which happens 50 percent of the time, the expected value of the expansion project, at time zero, is

NPV=11.100.50(40.361)=C$18.346millionNPV=\frac1{1.10}0.50(40.361)=C\$18.346million

The total NPV of the initial project and the expansion project is

NPV = –C$5.663 million + C$18.346 million = C$12.683 million

The optional expansion project, handled optimally, adds sufficient value to make this a positive NPV project.

扩张项目的PVCF1已经得出，为什么折现一期的PV就是NPV？能不能用老师说的画图作差法再解释一下？
添加评论
1 个答案
已采纳答案

Debrah_品职答疑助手 · 2020年03月30日

同学你好，对于期权下的扩张项目，需要分别计算High和low分别在t=1时刻的PVCF1，再经过判断是否选择扩张项目，乘以概率之后再折现到t=0时刻。拿这道题目来说：

①计算t=1时刻在概率为High的情况下的的NPV，NPV=40.362。计算t=1时刻在概率为low的情况下的的NPV，NPV=-74.82。

②判断：如果需求为high则选择扩张，此时概率为50%。

③求扩张项目的NPV0=（40.362*50%）/(1+10%)=18.346

④total NPV=-5.663+18.346=12.683。

这道题目是李老师上课讲的原题，老师讲得很细致，如果对中间过程仍有不清楚的，建议可以回听一下李老师上课的讲解。加油。

  • 1

    回答

  • 1

    关注

  • 412

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ201601200500000804 请问行权的时候不就是最优价值了吗？为什么最后还要加上没有option的原始NPV呢？谢谢!

2021-10-23 10:56 1 · 回答

NO.PZ201601200500000804 12.68. 31.03. B is correct. Assume we are time = 1. The NPV of the expansion (time 1) if manis \"high\" is NPV=−190+∑t=19401.10t=C$40.361millionNPV=-190+\sum_{t=1}^9\frac{40}{1.10^t}=C\$40.361millionNPV=−190+∑t=19​1.10t40​=C$40.361million The NPV of the expansion (time 1) if manis \"low\" is NPV=−190+∑t=19201.10t=‐C$74.820millionNPV=-190+\sum_{t=1}^9\frac{20}{1.10^t}=‐C\$74.820millionNPV=−190+∑t=19​1.10t20​=‐C$74.820million The optimcision is to expanif manis \"high\" annot expanif \"low.\" Because the expansion option is exerciseonly when its value is positive, whihappens 50 percent of the time, the expectevalue of the expansion project, time zero, is NPV=11.100.50(40.361)=C$18.346millionNPV=\frac1{1.10}0.50(40.361)=C\$18.346millionNPV=1.101​0.50(40.361)=C$18.346million The totNPV of the initiprojeanthe expansion projeis NPV = –C$5.663 million + C$18.346 million = C$12.683 million The optionexpansion project, haneoptimally, as sufficient value to make this a positive NPV project.请问老师，40/1.1^t t=9，这个计算器怎么按啊？还是要一个一个按，按9个？

2021-07-29 16:45 2 · 回答

NO.PZ201601200500000804 12.68. 31.03. B is correct. Assume we are time = 1. The NPV of the expansion (time 1) if manis \"high\" is NPV=−190+∑t=19401.10t=C$40.361millionNPV=-190+\sum_{t=1}^9\frac{40}{1.10^t}=C\$40.361millionNPV=−190+∑t=19​1.10t40​=C$40.361million The NPV of the expansion (time 1) if manis \"low\" is NPV=−190+∑t=19201.10t=‐C$74.820millionNPV=-190+\sum_{t=1}^9\frac{20}{1.10^t}=‐C\$74.820millionNPV=−190+∑t=19​1.10t20​=‐C$74.820million The optimcision is to expanif manis \"high\" annot expanif \"low.\" Because the expansion option is exerciseonly when its value is positive, whihappens 50 percent of the time, the expectevalue of the expansion project, time zero, is NPV=11.100.50(40.361)=C$18.346millionNPV=\frac1{1.10}0.50(40.361)=C\$18.346millionNPV=1.101​0.50(40.361)=C$18.346million The totNPV of the initiprojeanthe expansion projeis NPV = –C$5.663 million + C$18.346 million = C$12.683 million The optionexpansion project, haneoptimally, as sufficient value to make this a positive NPV project.为何不是在0时刻看，有两种情况 需求低，只投了190，不追加投资，npv为负 追加投资190，需求高，npv为正然后将两种情况各0.5加权求和？现在答案只考虑了第二种情况加权0.5，为何不第一种情况也加权0.5加在一起呢

2021-04-17 16:10 1 · 回答

为什么现金流要乘以0.5呢？即使PROBABILITY是50%，但是这个不是应该假设已经是OPTIMAL了吗，为什么还需要考虑概率。谢谢！

2020-06-04 11:09 1 · 回答