开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

wjzhyt · 2020年03月19日

问一道题:NO.PZ201511190100000302

* 问题详情,请 查看题干

问题如下:

Which of Tang’s observations is least likely to be the consequence of Jordan demonstrating loss-aversion bias?

选项:

A.

Observation 1.

B.

Observation 2.

C.

Observation 3.

解释:

C is correct.

Loss aversion by itself may cause a sector concentration; however, a market neutral strategy tends to focus on individual stocks without regard to the sector. The sector exposure would be mitigated with the balancing of the individual long and short positions.

我有一个疑问loss aversion会造成交易量下降。

但在这里No.PZ2018091702000002关于client 3 的 loss aversion 说 涨25卖,跌15卖,在这种情况下交易量不会变

这里两道题是不是有冲突

但考试直接按题目匹配知识点答题就行了吧?

1 个答案

Olive_品职助教 · 2020年03月19日

嗨,从没放弃的小努力你好:


PZ2018091702000002 和这道题角度不同,说的不是一件事。这道题说交易量会降低,是因为这道题是underperformance,这种情况下loss aversion会导致人更不愿意卖掉损失资产实现损失,非要等到涨了或者回本了才卖,现实中有很多这样的人,这就是loss aversion的一个典型特点。PZ2018091702000002这道题是站在事前的角度,Client 3对待价格上涨和下跌的态度是不对称的,他给自己定的投资规则是上涨到15%或下跌到10%卖出,这道题的关键词在于非对称,这也是loss aversion的一个特点,我没有读取出“ 在这种情况下交易量不会变 ”这个信息,我们要尽量基于题目所给的信息解题,不要脑补其他条件。所以这两道题针对的是loss aversion的不同特点,并没有什么冲突哦。


-------------------------------
努力的时光都是限量版,加油!


wjzhyt · 2020年03月19日

打错了,原来相输入的是在这种情况下交易量会不会变,理解了谢谢

  • 1

    回答
  • 1

    关注
  • 527

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ201511190100000302问题如下 Whiof Tang’s observations is least likely to the consequenof Jorn monstrating loss-aversion bias?A.Observation 1.B.Observation 2.C.Observation 3.C is correct.Loss aversion itself mcause a sector concentration; however, a market neutrstrategy ten to focus on invistocks without regarto the sector. The sector exposure woulmitigatewith the balancing of the invilong anshort positions.高风险,持有时间很长,unrwater不都是loss aversion的表现吗?

2022-12-22 15:30 3 · 回答

NO.PZ201511190100000302 问题如下 Whiof Tang’s observations is least likely to the consequenof Jorn monstrating loss-aversion bias? A.Observation 1. B.Observation 2. C.Observation 3. C is correct.Loss aversion itself mcause a sector concentration; however, a market neutrstrategy ten to focus on invistocks without regarto the sector. The sector exposure woulmitigatewith the balancing of the invilong anshort positions. Observation 2: The trang volume of the funhcreasemore th40 percent ring the past year.Observation 3: The portfolio is more concentratein a few sectors thin the past.他loss aversion 就将亏损的股票全部持有,好的股票都卖了,trang volume为什么会下降啊?不是应该不变或者上升吗?C亏的都留着在,那就是可能集中在某些行业,因为行业风险的原因一亏都亏,所以更集中C应该是对的的呀 B是错的呀,求解

2022-11-29 13:56 1 · 回答

NO.PZ201511190100000302 问题如下 Whiof Tang’s observations is least likely to the consequenof Jorn monstrating loss-aversion bias? A.Observation 1. B.Observation 2. C.Observation 3. C is correct.Loss aversion itself mcause a sector concentration; however, a market neutrstrategy ten to focus on invistocks without regarto the sector. The sector exposure woulmitigatewith the balancing of the invilong anshort positions. loss-aversion会增加交易量,说交易量会下降,所以不对啊。为什么答案关注点在于long/short策略

2022-07-04 11:59 2 · 回答

NO.PZ201511190100000302 Observation 2. Observation 3. C is correct. Loss aversion itself mcause a sector concentration; however, a market neutrstrategy ten to focus on invistocks without regarto the sector. The sector exposure woulmitigatewith the balancing of the invilong anshort positions. 如果一直存有亏损的头寸也会导致头寸集中吧

2022-03-22 16:52 1 · 回答

NO.PZ201511190100000302 Observation 2. Observation 3. C is correct. Loss aversion itself mcause a sector concentration; however, a market neutrstrategy ten to focus on invistocks without regarto the sector. The sector exposure woulmitigatewith the balancing of the invilong anshort positions. position unr water 是指现在的持仓太少了么

2022-02-15 10:46 1 · 回答