开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

Viva · 2020年01月06日

问一道题:NO.PZ2019012201000075

问题如下:

Chen and Garcia next discuss characteristics of long–short and long-only investing. Garcia makes the following statements about investing with long–short and long-only managers:
Statement 1 A long–short portfolio allows for a gross exposure of 100%.
Statement 2 A long-only portfolio generally allows for greater investment capacity than other approaches, particularly when using strategies that focus on large-cap stocks.
Which of Garcia’s statements regarding investing with long–short and longonly managers is correct?

选项:

A.

Only Statement 1

B.

Only Statement 2

C.

Both Statement 1 and Statement 2

解释:

C is correct. Both Statement 1 and Statement 2 are correct.Statement 1 is correct because, similar to a long-only portfolio, a long–short portfolio can be structured to have a gross exposure of 100%. Gross exposure of the portfolio is calculated as the sum of the long positions and the absolute value of the short positions, expressed as percentages of the portfolio’s capital.
Gross exposure = Long positions + |Short positions|
Gross exposure long-only portfolio = 100% (Long positions) + 0% (Short positions) = 100%
Gross exposure long–short portfolio = 50% (Long positions) + |–50%| (Short positions) = 100%
Statement 2 is correct because long-only investing generally offers greater investment capacity than other approaches, particularly when using strategies that focus on large-cap stocks. For large institutional investors such as pension plans, there are no effective capacity constraints in terms of the total market cap available for long-only investing.

为什么gross position=100%,不明白答案中为什么用50%的例子。

2 个答案

Viva · 2020年01月09日

还是没明白,截图的讲义不正好说明了long only 的gross expoure 不是100%,验证了我的疑问A错吗?

粉红豹 · 2020年01月11日

同问,请教老师,一个组合,只要有short头寸,那么long/short portfolio的gross exposure 不就是一定大于100%吗?为什么你可以long 50%,short 50%?那long剩下的那50%全部是现金吗?如果是 现金,也可以认为是投资了rf呀,那么也是long头寸中的啊,所以应该是100%的long,50%的short呀????

maggie_品职助教 · 2020年01月14日

按提问时间先回答VIVA:讲义中写的是权重之和不再限制为1,不代表LS不能是100%. 如果按照long/short 50/50,即买50/卖50时,gross exposure=100%。再回答粉红豹:我可以先卖空50%,拿了钱再买50%。组合中有50%的现金不计入头寸,因为它并没给有买卖任何股票。两位同学都请注意long/short 50/50只是一种交易的可能性,正好利用这道题,拓宽下思路。

maggie_品职助教 · 2020年01月07日

Statement 1说的是同时做多做空的组合是否允许gross exposure等于100%, 答案是可以的。 gross exposure等于long 的权重加上short 的权重的绝对值。如果long/short 50/50,即买50/卖50时,gross exposure=100%。


  • 2

    回答
  • 2

    关注
  • 581

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ2019012201000075 问题如下 Chen anGarcia next scuss characteristiof long–short anlong-only investing. Garcia makes the following statements about investing with long–short anlong-only managers:Statement 1 A long–short portfolio allows for a gross exposure of 100%.Statement 2 A long-only portfolio generally allows for greater investment capacity thother approaches, particularly when using strategies thfocus on large-cstocks. Whiof Garcia’s statements regarng investing with long–short anlongonly managers is correct? A.Only Statement 1 B.Only Statement 2 C.Both Statement 1 anStatement 2 C is correct. Both Statement 1 anStatement 2 are correct.Statement 1 is correbecause, similto a long-only portfolio, a long–short portfolio cstructureto have a gross exposure of 100%. Gross exposure of the portfolio is calculatethe sum of the long positions anthe absolute value of the short positions, expressepercentages of the portfolio’s capital.Gross exposure = Long positions + |Short positions|Gross exposure long-only portfolio = 100% (Long positions) + 0% (Short positions) = 100%Gross exposure long–short portfolio = 50% (Long positions) + |–50%| (Short positions) = 100%Statement 2 is correbecause long-only investing generally offers greater investment capacity thother approaches, particularly when using strategies thfocus on large-cstocks. For large institutioninvestors supension plans, there are no effective capacity constraints in terms of the totmarket cavailable for long-only investing. 老师,上课讲的gross exposure 根据130-30,应该是160%啊。 net exposure才是100%。为什么第一个论述是对的呢?

2024-08-17 14:40 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2019012201000075问题如下Chen anGarcia next scuss characteristiof long–short anlong-only investing. Garcia makes the following statements about investing with long–short anlong-only managers:Statement 1 A long–short portfolio allows for a gross exposure of 100%.Statement 2 A long-only portfolio generally allows for greater investment capacity thother approaches, particularly when using strategies thfocus on large-cstocks. Whiof Garcia’s statements regarng investing with long–short anlongonly managers is correct? A.Only Statement 1 B.Only Statement 2 C.Both Statement 1 anStatement 2 C is correct. Both Statement 1 anStatement 2 are correct.Statement 1 is correbecause, similto a long-only portfolio, a long–short portfolio cstructureto have a gross exposure of 100%. Gross exposure of the portfolio is calculatethe sum of the long positions anthe absolute value of the short positions, expressepercentages of the portfolio’s capital.Gross exposure = Long positions + |Short positions|Gross exposure long-only portfolio = 100% (Long positions) + 0% (Short positions) = 100%Gross exposure long–short portfolio = 50% (Long positions) + |–50%| (Short positions) = 100%Statement 2 is correbecause long-only investing generally offers greater investment capacity thother approaches, particularly when using strategies thfocus on large-cstocks. For large institutioninvestors supension plans, there are no effective capacity constraints in terms of the totmarket cavailable for long-only investing. 本题问的是capacity。CAPACITY指策略的市场容量。也就是这个策略,最大可以管理多少资金。这里我们首先需要知道多头管理的资金,大于空头所能管理的资金。例如,一个Long only 策略,可以管理1000亿资金,一个short only策略,可能管理资金最多只能有100亿。这是因为做空存在的限制,要比做多,多很多。那比如我做空10%去做多,不就能110%吗?谢谢

2024-06-30 12:50 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2019012201000075 问题如下 Chen anGarcia next scuss characteristiof long–short anlong-only investing. Garcia makes the following statements about investing with long–short anlong-only managers:Statement 1 A long–short portfolio allows for a gross exposure of 100%.Statement 2 A long-only portfolio generally allows for greater investment capacity thother approaches, particularly when using strategies thfocus on large-cstocks. Whiof Garcia’s statements regarng investing with long–short anlongonly managers is correct? A.Only Statement 1 B.Only Statement 2 C.Both Statement 1 anStatement 2 C is correct. Both Statement 1 anStatement 2 are correct.Statement 1 is correbecause, similto a long-only portfolio, a long–short portfolio cstructureto have a gross exposure of 100%. Gross exposure of the portfolio is calculatethe sum of the long positions anthe absolute value of the short positions, expressepercentages of the portfolio’s capital.Gross exposure = Long positions + |Short positions|Gross exposure long-only portfolio = 100% (Long positions) + 0% (Short positions) = 100%Gross exposure long–short portfolio = 50% (Long positions) + |–50%| (Short positions) = 100%Statement 2 is correbecause long-only investing generally offers greater investment capacity thother approaches, particularly when using strategies thfocus on large-cstocks. For large institutioninvestors supension plans, there are no effective capacity constraints in terms of the totmarket cavailable for long-only investing. 接这个题想问一下主动投资的思路。主动投资的strategy里面有factor-basestrategy里面有heing portfolio 和factor tilting portfolio。而且再portfoilio construction note上讲到了long/short 和long only 的两种方法,我想问一下,他们的直接内在联系是什么?

2024-06-28 14:46 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2019012201000075问题如下Chen anGarcia next scuss characteristiof long–short anlong-only investing. Garcia makes the following statements about investing with long–short anlong-only managers:Statement 1 A long–short portfolio allows for a gross exposure of 100%.Statement 2 A long-only portfolio generally allows for greater investment capacity thother approaches, particularly when using strategies thfocus on large-cstocks. Whiof Garcia’s statements regarng investing with long–short anlongonly managers is correct? A.Only Statement 1 B.Only Statement 2 C.Both Statement 1 anStatement 2 C is correct. Both Statement 1 anStatement 2 are correct.Statement 1 is correbecause, similto a long-only portfolio, a long–short portfolio cstructureto have a gross exposure of 100%. Gross exposure of the portfolio is calculatethe sum of the long positions anthe absolute value of the short positions, expressepercentages of the portfolio’s capital.Gross exposure = Long positions + |Short positions|Gross exposure long-only portfolio = 100% (Long positions) + 0% (Short positions) = 100%Gross exposure long–short portfolio = 50% (Long positions) + |–50%| (Short positions) = 100%Statement 2 is correbecause long-only investing generally offers greater investment capacity thother approaches, particularly when using strategies thfocus on large-cstocks. For large institutioninvestors supension plans, there are no effective capacity constraints in terms of the totmarket cavailable for long-only investing. 如题,没看明白是什么意思,为什么long only strategy又更大的investment capacity?

2024-06-28 10:03 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2019012201000075问题如下 Chen anGarcia next scuss characteristiof long–short anlong-only investing. Garcia makes the following statements about investing with long–short anlong-only managers:Statement 1 A long–short portfolio allows for a gross exposure of 100%.Statement 2 A long-only portfolio generally allows for greater investment capacity thother approaches, particularly when using strategies thfocus on large-cstocks. Whiof Garcia’s statements regarng investing with long–short anlongonly managers is correct? A.Only Statement 1 B.Only Statement 2 C.Both Statement 1 anStatement 2 C is correct. Both Statement 1 anStatement 2 are correct.Statement 1 is correbecause, similto a long-only portfolio, a long–short portfolio cstructureto have a gross exposure of 100%. Gross exposure of the portfolio is calculatethe sum of the long positions anthe absolute value of the short positions, expressepercentages of the portfolio’s capital.Gross exposure = Long positions + |Short positions|Gross exposure long-only portfolio = 100% (Long positions) + 0% (Short positions) = 100%Gross exposure long–short portfolio = 50% (Long positions) + |–50%| (Short positions) = 100%Statement 2 is correbecause long-only investing generally offers greater investment capacity thother approaches, particularly when using strategies thfocus on large-cstocks. For large institutioninvestors supension plans, there are no effective capacity constraints in terms of the totmarket cavailable for long-only investing. 我对这块一直很迷糊,long extension是特殊的long short吗?一般就是130/30?130/30是融券了30,又把这30去做多吧?那这样话总的持仓究竟是算多少?capacity是持仓吗?gross exposure是160,net是100吧?考试的时候是不是所有策略的net exposure都是100呢?因为都是全仓投资?如果是50/50是不是相对于没用本金,纯靠融券的钱?80/20等这些比例都存在吗?这里还需要掌握什么点呢,我感觉我没有理解透。谢谢老师解答。

2024-05-30 08:35 1 · 回答