data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d316a/d316ab8dcda924061189ed080ae794d619d910a6" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41a1e/41a1e78bcd408dbdce7f01784d6756b030966d5c" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3e5f/b3e5f1c8ce18ab91c856df246ca224124c52eb37" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/64912/64912b9c31fe3ba13f9adf4dd81eae482d751b20" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/04219/04219141d30c656d1efd8885cd7d09d84a0b645d" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/feb68/feb68d03a353f154e2136494c66c4a779cf861c5" alt=""
Shimin_CPA税法主讲、CFA教研 · 2017年10月16日
我写两个定义:
Second-order stochastic dominance (SSD): Portfolio A will dominate B if A has higher mean and lower risk.
First-order stochastic dominance (FSD): if the cumulative distribution function for A is systematiclly lower than that for B, then B has higher probability of a bad outcome.
这个不是重点,就算不理解C也能选出D,D是课上强调的。你学有余力就记个结论:ES与SSD的原理一致,VAR与FSD的原理一致。FSD的要求比SSD严格。
NO.PZ2016070202000011 问题如下 Whiof the following statements about expecteshortfall (ES) is incorrect? A.ES provis a consistent risk measure across fferent positions antakes account of correlations. B.ES tells whto expein bstates: It gives ia of how bthe portfolio payoff cexpecteto if the portfolio ha boutcome. C.ES-baserule is consistent with expecteutility maximization if risks are rankea seconorr stochastic minanrule. Like VAR, ES es not always satisfy subaitivity (i.e., the risk of a portfolio must less thor equto the sum of the risks of its invipositions). is correct. ES, like VAR, es provi a consistent measure of risk thtakes versification into account, so statement Unlike VAR, however, CVis a sub-aitive risk measure. 老师,2023年考纲的话,C还是超纲吗?貌似基础课没有这个知识点。
NO.PZ2016070202000011 老师请问ES是怎么考虑相关性的
NO.PZ2016070202000011 请老师下C
NO.PZ2016070202000011 请问老师,A中ES考虑correlation是怎么的,谢谢
什么意思,没懂。。。。。。。