开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

一蒙就对 · 2019年12月03日

问一道题:NO.PZ2016032801000016 [ CFA I ]

问题如下图:老师 这题没有说10%的收益不是约定好的,咱怎么判断他说的是真是假,只要是题目没给确切的回报率 她说了就都认为是不严谨的对吧;

选项:

A.

B.

C.

解释:

1 个答案

包包_品职助教 · 2019年12月04日

嗨,爱思考的PZer你好:


这个10%的收益是我们无法确定能够拿到的收益,我们是没办法和客户约定好的。

一般除非买银行存款或者美国国债,否则我们不能确定的告诉客户他的资产能有多少的收益率


-------------------------------
努力的时光都是限量版,加油!


尼克内姆 · 2020年07月29日

问一下,您的解释是说,除了直接买国债或银行存款才能指明收益率,即便是国债的基金也不能明确未来收益率是吗?

  • 1

    回答
  • 1

    关注
  • 475

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ2016032801000016问题如下Grey recommen the purchase of a mutufunthinvests solely in long-term US Treasury bon. He makes the following statements to his clients:I. \"The payment of the bon is guaranteethe US government; therefore, the fault risk of the bon is virtually zero.\"II. \"If you invest in the mutufun you will earn a 10% rate of return eayefor the next severyears baseon historicperformanof the market.\" Grey’s statements violate the CFA Institute Co anStanr?A.Neither statement violatethe Co anStanr.B.Only statement I violatethe Co anStanr.C.Only statement II violatethe Co anStanr.C is correct.This question involves StanrI(–Misrepresentation. Statement I is a factustatement thscloses to clients anprospects accurate information about the terms of the investment instrument. Statement II, whiguarantees a specific rate of return for a mutufun is opinion statea faan therefore, violates StanrI(C). If statement II were rephraseto inclu a qualifying statement, su \"in my opinion, investors mearn . . . ,\" it woulnot in violation of the Stanr.为什么第一项没有violate?

2024-06-14 15:10 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2016032801000016 问题如下 Grey recommen the purchase of a mutufunthinvests solely in long-term US Treasury bon. He makes the following statements to his clients:I. \"The payment of the bon is guaranteethe US government; therefore, the fault risk of the bon is virtually zero.\"II. \"If you invest in the mutufun you will earn a 10% rate of return eayefor the next severyears baseon historicperformanof the market.\" Grey’s statements violate the CFA Institute Co anStanr? A.Neither statement violatethe Co anStanr. B.Only statement I violatethe Co anStanr. C.Only statement II violatethe Co anStanr. C is correct.This question involves StanrI(–Misrepresentation. Statement I is a factustatement thscloses to clients anprospects accurate information about the terms of the investment instrument. Statement II, whiguarantees a specific rate of return for a mutufun is opinion statea faan therefore, violates StanrI(C). If statement II were rephraseto inclu a qualifying statement, su \"in my opinion, investors mearn . . . ,\" it woulnot in violation of the Stanr. 在题干已经叙述,mutufun投资在美国国债,为什么不可以保证每年10%的收益率。美国国债的收益率不应该是问很稳定的,甚至可以是precate

2022-05-07 00:25 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2016032801000016 强化课讲义提到【如果本身return是可以保证的,也可以guarantee】。 题目中的表述二里面有个baseon historicperformance,这样足以说明return是可以保证的吗? “本身return是可以保证的”,这句话通常会有哪些表述? 谢谢老师解答。

2022-02-22 15:40 1 · 回答

老师 如果will earn 的表述不对 那换成什么就可以算是对的

2020-10-30 16:34 1 · 回答