开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

于彤昆 · 2019年04月13日

问一道题:NO.PZ201601050100000303 第3小题

* 问题详情,请 查看题干

问题如下图:

    

选项:

A.

B.

C.

解释:


恳请老师们看下我的思路哪里有误,很疑惑,请指正。

R(INR)>R(USD)

因此,借INR 投USD。

但根据B选项,应该是USD升值,INR贬值,这样在投资完成撤资时,就会造成INR换回USD变少的情况,这怎么能算是对carry trade有利呢?而且carry trade里面不是讲过,高利率国家长期来看,就因为热钱涌入,之后因为大量撤资导致货币贬值么?这种情况就对carry trade不利,而这不也就是UIRP短期不成立能做carry trade 的条件么?但长期就因为高利率国货币贬值,才能使得利率差和汇率差相等使得UIRP在长期成立。

只复制给别人的回答就不要来回答,谢谢


1 个答案

Shimin_CPA税法主讲、CFA教研 · 2019年04月15日

在低利率国家借钱,去高利率国家投资。 因此,借USD 投INR。 反了。

carry trade是短中期,短中期 UIRP不成立是实证研究结果。原版书上这句话这样说:in reality, the historical data show that there are persistent deviations from uncovered
interest rate parity in FX markets, at least in the short to medium term。“高利率国家长期来看,就因为热钱涌入,之后因为大量撤资导致货币贬值" 这是长期。长期UIRP成立呀。

  • 1

    回答
  • 1

    关注
  • 391

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ201601050100000303 问题如下 3. Whiof the following market velopments woulmost favorable for Subscriber 3's trang plan? A.A narrower interest rate fferential. B.A higher forwarpremium for INR/US C.Higher volatility in INR/USspot rate movements. B is correct.Subscriber 3's carry tra strategy is equivalent to trang the forwarrate bias, baseon the historicevinththe forwarrate is not the center of the stribution for the spot rate. Applying this biinvolves buying currencies selling a forwarscount anselling currencies trang a forwarpremium. So a higher forwarpremium on the lower yielng currency—the US the base currenin the INR/USquote—wouleffectively reflea more profitable trang opportunity. This, a higher premium for buying or selling the USforwaris associatewith a lower US interest rate compareto InThis woulmea wir interest rate fferentiin favor of Ininstruments, anhenpotentially more carry tra profits.A is incorrebecause Subscriber 3's carry tra strategy pen on a wi interest rate fferentibetween the high-yielcountry (Inanthe low-yielcountry (the UniteStates). The fferentishoulwi enough to compensate for the unheecurrenrisk exposure.C is incorrebecause a gui to the carry tra‘s riskiness is the volatility of spot rates on the involvecurrencies, with rapimovements in exchange rates often associatewith a panickeunwinng of carry tras. All things being equal, higher volatility is worse for carry tras.中文解析Bhigher forwarpremium或者表述为larger forwarpremium,是两国利差变大的意思,所以在carry tra中看到这个表述就直接等同为两国利差变大。可以从下面这个角度来理解(1)我们可以用covereinterest rate parity(抛补的利率平价公式)来,根据. covereinterest rate parityF/S0=(1+r_A)/(1+r_(汇率标价形式为A/B); 其中r_A r_所以F S0(借A投B)。(2)得到F S0,又因为标价形式是A/B,可得高利率的货币B将来是贬值的(因为F S0),因此利率高的货币叫做forwarscount currency,而利率低的货币A就会升值,叫做 forwarpremium currency。(3)所以,如果F/S0=(1+r_A)/(1+r_B)这个公式中r_A r_B的程度越大,就说明F S的程度越大,对应的低利率货币A就会有更大的forwarpremium。而r_A r_B程度越大,就说明二者的利差越大2. 执行carry tra的条件有二,一是两国利差大,二是汇率变化很小。因此A和C的表述是错误的 答案是large forwarpremiun on the US这道题首先borrow的是US 投资的是印度资产,到期的时候一定要把印度的资产换成US资产,如果US大幅升值,未来将会直接导致亏损,怎么还有有利呢。

2023-12-26 13:27 1 · 回答

NO.PZ201601050100000303问题如下3. Whiof the following market velopments woulmost favorable for Subscriber 3's trang plan?A.A narrower interest rate fferential.B.A higher forwarpremium for INR/USC.Higher volatility in INR/USspot rate movements. B is correct.Subscriber 3's carry tra strategy is equivalent to trang the forwarrate bias, baseon the historicevinththe forwarrate is not the center of the stribution for the spot rate. Applying this biinvolves buying currencies selling a forwarscount anselling currencies trang a forwarpremium. So a higher forwarpremium on the lower yielng currency—the US the base currenin the INR/USquote—wouleffectively reflea more profitable trang opportunity. This, a higher premium for buying or selling the USforwaris associatewith a lower US interest rate compareto InThis woulmea wir interest rate fferentiin favor of Ininstruments, anhenpotentially more carry tra profits.A is incorrebecause Subscriber 3's carry tra strategy pen on a wi interest rate fferentibetween the high-yielcountry (Inanthe low-yielcountry (the UniteStates). The fferentishoulwi enough to compensate for the unheecurrenrisk exposure.C is incorrebecause a gui to the carry tra‘s riskiness is the volatility of spot rates on the involvecurrencies, with rapimovements in exchange rates often associatewith a panickeunwinng of carry tras. All things being equal, higher volatility is worse for carry tras.中文解析Bhigher forwarpremium或者表述为larger forwarpremium,是两国利差变大的意思,所以在carry tra中看到这个表述就直接等同为两国利差变大。可以从下面这个角度来理解(1)我们可以用covereinterest rate parity(抛补的利率平价公式)来,根据. covereinterest rate parityF/S0=(1+r_A)/(1+r_(汇率标价形式为A/B); 其中r_A r_所以F S0(借A投B)。(2)得到F S0,又因为标价形式是A/B,可得高利率的货币B将来是贬值的(因为F S0),因此利率高的货币叫做forwarscount currency,而利率低的货币A就会升值,叫做 forwarpremium currency。(3)所以,如果F/S0=(1+r_A)/(1+r_B)这个公式中r_A r_B的程度越大,就说明F S的程度越大,对应的低利率货币A就会有更大的forwarpremium。而r_A r_B程度越大,就说明二者的利差越大2. 执行carry tra的条件有二,一是两国利差大,二是汇率变化很小。因此A和C的表述是错误的 明白老师说的larger forwarpremium 等于利差大的这个点但针对这题衍生出来的问题这里carry tra中 有forwarpremium的currency应该是US对吧。另外就是如果说一对currenpair (INR/UShlarger forwarpremium 指的是哪个currency?

2023-11-19 17:45 2 · 回答

NO.PZ201601050100000303问题如下 3. Whiof the following market velopments woulmost favorable for Subscriber 3's trang plan?A.A narrower interest rate fferential.B.A higher forwarpremium for INR/USC.Higher volatility in INR/USspot rate movements. B is correct.Subscriber 3's carry tra strategy is equivalent to trang the forwarrate bias, baseon the historicevinththe forwarrate is not the center of the stribution for the spot rate. Applying this biinvolves buying currencies selling a forwarscount anselling currencies trang a forwarpremium. So a higher forwarpremium on the lower yielng currency—the US the base currenin the INR/USquote—wouleffectively reflea more profitable trang opportunity. This, a higher premium for buying or selling the USforwaris associatewith a lower US interest rate compareto InThis woulmea wir interest rate fferentiin favor of Ininstruments, anhenpotentially more carry tra profits.A is incorrebecause Subscriber 3's carry tra strategy pen on a wi interest rate fferentibetween the high-yielcountry (Inanthe low-yielcountry (the UniteStates). The fferentishoulwi enough to compensate for the unheecurrenrisk exposure.C is incorrebecause a gui to the carry tra‘s riskiness is the volatility of spot rates on the involvecurrencies, with rapimovements in exchange rates often associatewith a panickeunwinng of carry tras. All things being equal, higher volatility is worse for carry tras.中文解析Bhigher forwarpremium或者表述为larger forwarpremium,是两国利差变大的意思,所以在carry tra中看到这个表述就直接等同为两国利差变大。可以从下面这个角度来理解(1)我们可以用covereinterest rate parity(抛补的利率平价公式)来,根据. covereinterest rate parityF/S0=(1+r_A)/(1+r_(汇率标价形式为A/B); 其中r_A r_所以F S0(借A投B)。(2)得到F S0,又因为标价形式是A/B,可得高利率的货币B将来是贬值的(因为F S0),因此利率高的货币叫做forwarscount currency,而利率低的货币A就会升值,叫做 forwarpremium currency。(3)所以,如果F/S0=(1+r_A)/(1+r_B)这个公式中r_A r_B的程度越大,就说明F S的程度越大,对应的低利率货币A就会有更大的forwarpremium。而r_A r_B程度越大,就说明二者的利差越大2. 执行carry tra的条件有二,一是两国利差大,二是汇率变化很小。因此A和C的表述是错误的 不对啊,专门讲过roll yiel这b不就导致roll yiel小于0么,那这样成本就变大了不是不利么

2023-02-10 13:42 1 · 回答

NO.PZ201601050100000303 问题如下 3. Whiof the following market velopments woulmost favorable for Subscriber 3's trang plan? A.A narrower interest rate fferential. B.A higher forwarpremium for INR/US C.Higher volatility in INR/USspot rate movements. B is correct.Subscriber 3's carry tra strategy is equivalent to trang the forwarrate bias, baseon the historicevinththe forwarrate is not the center of the stribution for the spot rate. Applying this biinvolves buying currencies selling a forwarscount anselling currencies trang a forwarpremium. So a higher forwarpremium on the lower yielng currency—the US the base currenin the INR/USquote—wouleffectively reflea more profitable trang opportunity. This, a higher premium for buying or selling the USforwaris associatewith a lower US interest rate compareto InThis woulmea wir interest rate fferentiin favor of Ininstruments, anhenpotentially more carry tra profits.A is incorrebecause Subscriber 3's carry tra strategy pen on a wi interest rate fferentibetween the high-yielcountry (Inanthe low-yielcountry (the UniteStates). The fferentishoulwi enough to compensate for the unheecurrenrisk exposure.C is incorrebecause a gui to the carry tra‘s riskiness is the volatility of spot rates on the involvecurrencies, with rapimovements in exchange rates often associatewith a panickeunwinng of carry tras. All things being equal, higher volatility is worse for carry tras.中文解析Bhigher forwarpremium或者表述为larger forwarpremium,是两国利差变大的意思,所以在carry tra中看到这个表述就直接等同为两国利差变大。可以从下面这个角度来理解(1)我们可以用covereinterest rate parity(抛补的利率平价公式)来,根据. covereinterest rate parityF/S0=(1+r_A)/(1+r_(汇率标价形式为A/B); 其中r_A r_所以F S0(借A投B)。(2)得到F S0,又因为标价形式是A/B,可得高利率的货币B将来是贬值的(因为F S0),因此利率高的货币叫做forwarscount currency,而利率低的货币A就会升值,叫做 forwarpremium currency。(3)所以,如果F/S0=(1+r_A)/(1+r_B)这个公式中r_A r_B的程度越大,就说明F S的程度越大,对应的低利率货币A就会有更大的forwarpremium。而r_A r_B程度越大,就说明二者的利差越大2. 执行carry tra的条件有二,一是两国利差大,二是汇率变化很小。因此A和C的表述是错误的 B答案A higher forwarpremium for INR/US代表F S,则未来US升值,如果它在US钱,未来要还的钱更多,这不是个好事情,所以不应该选择B?

2022-05-26 08:58 1 · 回答

NO.PZ201601050100000303 当前印度利率大于美国,所以借美元投卢布,如果利差变大,卢布bon值,同时还有外汇损失,对套利不利,所以应该选A

2021-11-09 09:25 2 · 回答