问题如下图:
选项:
A.
B.
C.
解释:
India 的GDP per capital 不是比Brazil大吗?
Growth e to labor proctivity Growth e to capitepening A is correct. Kanté’s cision to invest in equities in Ina is supportethe country’s strong economic growth. For globinvestors, economic growth is important sinequity composite valuations pento a greextent on both the level of economic output (G per capita anG overall) anon the rate of economic growth. Relative to Brazil, the growth rate in per capita G hbeen muhigher, anfurthermore, the growth rate in G halso been muhigher ththof Brazil. In contrast to the growth rate, the relatively low level of G per capita in Ina is less likely to incate attractive equity investment opportunities. Low per capita G suggests thIna mlasufficient instrian financiinfrastructure to support some types of instries. It also incates thmestic purchasing power is relatively limite creasing the potentifor higher-margin, mestically-orientebusinesses. 考点影响一国的经济增长的因素。 解析 投资人更愿意投资印度权益市场,那就表明印度G发展的更好,能为投资者带来更多的投资回报。 从表格数据来看,印度的人均G低于巴西,但从这点来看,印度发展不如巴西,因为较低的人均G意味着印度缺乏完善的工业基础以及金融机构去支持经济发展,并且较低人均G还限制了该国人均消费水平。所以A入选,这是不支持投资印度的理由。 而无论是生产效率对于经济增长的贡献还是资本深化对于经济增长的贡献,印度都大于巴西,所以B,C不入选。老师您好,人均G是个绝对数字也能横向比么?投资不都看增长潜力的么……
G per capita这个就是人均G对吗?这个和output per worker(labor proctivity)有什么区别?应该是一样的吧?
capitper worker、labor proctibity、G per capita分别是意思?
1.为什么选择A?1.1这题需要计算吗? 如何知道用哪个公式去判断?2。 可否就将下面两个翻译成英文,(这是我看上一个提问者里的)劳动力生产率的增长率=潜在G增长率-劳动力的长期增长率资本深化对于经济的贡献=潜在G的增长率-TFP=资本生化的贡献(假设劳动力不变)。