开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

fairyruby11 · 2019年01月13日

问一道题:NO.PZ201805280100000101 第1小题 [ CFA III ]

* 问题详情,请 查看题干

问题如下图:

选项:

A.

B.

C.

解释:

为什么不是B呢,spending rate下降,required rerurn rate下降,所以增加风险收益都较小的bond class资产

1 个答案

Shimin_CPA税法主讲、CFA教研 · 2019年01月13日

spending rate下降,required rerurn rate下降,因此这个捐赠基金的风险承受能力是变强的。这就好比一个人的收入(大学的enrollment)增加了,支出(spending rate)减少了,那么投资可以更激进一些。

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 352

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ201805280100000101 问题如下 1.The change in the annuspenng rate, in conjunction with the boars expectations regarng future enrollment anthe neefor enwment support, couljustify thKUE’s target weight for: A.infrastructure increase B.investment- gra bon increase C.private reestate equity crease A is correct. A lower annuspenng rate, in aition to the boars expectations of rising enrollment anminimneefor enwment support over the next five years, incates a creaseneefor liquity. Therefore, KUE couljustify increase in the strategic allocation to less liquiasset classes (suprivate reestate equity aninfrastructure) ana crease in the strategic allocation to liquiassets (suinvestment- gra bon).考点revisiting the SAA解析每年支出比率减少,学费预期增加,因此KUE的流动性需求下降,因此可以增加投资期长、流动性比较差的资产。A中的infrastructure以及C中的private reestate是illiquiasset,投资权重应当增加,B中的investment- gra bon流动性较强,投资权重应当减少。所以权重增减的判断正确的是 每年支出比率减少,学费预期增加,那不是之后可以投更稳定的资产以降低风险吗?比如投investment- gra bon。private reestate属于alternative风险更高。学校每年支出在减少,投资收益能超过支出就可以,所以之后可以投的更稳。这个角度理解为何不对?

2023-02-15 14:06 1 · 回答

NO.PZ201805280100000101 问题如下 1.The change in the annuspenng rate, in conjunction with the boars expectations regarng future enrollment anthe neefor enwment support, couljustify thKUE’s target weight for: A.infrastructure increase B.investment- gra bon increase C.private reestate equity crease A is correct. A lower annuspenng rate, in aition to the boars expectations of rising enrollment anminimneefor enwment support over the next five years, incates a creaseneefor liquity. Therefore, KUE couljustify increase in the strategic allocation to less liquiasset classes (suprivate reestate equity aninfrastructure) ana crease in the strategic allocation to liquiassets (suinvestment- gra bon).考点revisiting the SAA解析每年支出比率减少,学费预期增加,因此KUE的流动性需求下降,因此可以增加投资期长、流动性比较差的资产。A中的infrastructure以及C中的private reestate是illiquiasset,投资权重应当增加,B中的investment- gra bon流动性较强,投资权重应当减少。所以权重增减的判断正确的是 老师请问,这里的投资infrastructure是指学校的基础建设吗?这种会有投资收益的吗?

2022-12-29 14:18 1 · 回答

NO.PZ201805280100000101 问题如下 1.The change in the annuspenng rate, in conjunction with the boars expectations regarng future enrollment anthe neefor enwment support, couljustify thKUE’s target weight for: A.infrastructure increase B.investment- gra bon increase C.private reestate equity crease A is correct. A lower annuspenng rate, in aition to the boars expectations of rising enrollment anminimneefor enwment support over the next five years, incates a creaseneefor liquity. Therefore, KUE couljustify increase in the strategic allocation to less liquiasset classes (suprivate reestate equity aninfrastructure) ana crease in the strategic allocation to liquiassets (suinvestment- gra bon).考点revisiting the SAA解析每年支出比率减少,学费预期增加,因此KUE的流动性需求下降,因此可以增加投资期长、流动性比较差的资产。A中的infrastructure以及C中的private reestate是illiquiasset,投资权重应当增加,B中的investment- gra bon流动性较强,投资权重应当减少。所以权重增减的判断正确的是 他不是不要那么多流动性吗,那就Bonequity都可以呀?

2022-12-25 22:26 1 · 回答

NO.PZ201805280100000101 根据Ehxibit 1, investment gra bon比例由现在的%增加到了target的20%,难道不是增加了bon?

2021-06-10 19:18 1 · 回答

请问一下老师,Infrastructure的expecteexcess return 是小于零的,为什么投资的比例还要上升呢?谢谢老师

2020-10-15 11:45 1 · 回答