开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)｜3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

返回

魏丽aa · 2018年12月14日

问一道题：NO.PZ201709270100000302 第2小题

  1. CFA II
  2. Quantitative

* 问题详情，请 查看题干

问题如下图：

    

选项：

A.

B.

C.

解释：

 没看懂答案，用2.308和谁比？


添加评论
1 个答案

菲菲_品职助教 · 2018年12月14日

同学你好，这题其实可以直接拿两者各自的P值和α，即significance level进行比较哦，这样比较方便一些。两者的P值均大于0.01，所以都不能拒绝原假设，都是不显著的。

  • 1

    回答

  • 0

    关注

  • 435

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ201709270100000302 问题如下 2. a significanlevel of 1%, whiof the following is the best interpretation of the regression coefficients with regarto explaining ROE? ESG is significant, but tenure is not. Tenure is significant, but ESG is not. Neither ESG nor tenure is significant. C is correct. The t-statistic for tenure is 2.308, incating significanthe 0.027 level but not the 0.01 level. The t-statistic for ESG is 1.201, with a p-value of 0.238, whimeans we fail to rejethe null hypothesis for ESG the 0.01 significanlevel. 这里也有T值，我是否可以用T检验

2023-04-24 21:41 1 · 回答

NO.PZ201709270100000302 问题如下 2. a significanlevel of 1%, whiof the following is the best interpretation of the regression coefficients with regarto explaining ROE? ESG is significant, but tenure is not. Tenure is significant, but ESG is not. Neither ESG nor tenure is significant. C is correct. The t-statistic for tenure is 2.308, incating significanthe 0.027 level but not the 0.01 level. The t-statistic for ESG is 1.201, with a p-value of 0.238, whimeans we fail to rejethe null hypothesis for ESG the 0.01 significanlevel. 请问P-LEVEL 都是和1%来比较嘛，还是说因为题干里说了1%？

2023-04-11 17:27 2 · 回答

NO.PZ201709270100000302 2. a significanlevel of 1%, whiof the following is the best interpretation of the regression coefficients with regarto explaining ROE? ESG is significant, but tenure is not. Tenure is significant, but ESG is not. Neither ESG nor tenure is significant. C is correct. The t-statistic for tenure is 2.308, incating significanthe 0.027 level but not the 0.01 level. The t-statistic for ESG is 1.201, with a p-value of 0.238, whimeans we fail to rejethe null hypothesis for ESG the 0.01 significanlevel. 下次碰到这种题目的问法，也是直接比较即可么

2021-12-03 09:18 1 · 回答

2. a significanlevel of 1%, whiof the following is the best interpretation of the regression coefficients with regarto explaining ROE? ESG is significant, but tenure is not. Tenure is significant, but ESG is not. Neither ESG nor tenure is significant. C is correct. The t-statistic for tenure is 2.308, incating significanthe 0.027 level but not the 0.01 level. The t-statistic for ESG is 1.201, with a p-value of 0.238, whimeans we fail to rejethe null hypothesis for ESG the 0.01 significanlevel. 怎么判断 原假设和H谢谢

2020-07-15 17:06 1 · 回答

2. a significanlevel of 1%, whiof the following is the best interpretation of the regression coefficients with regarto explaining ROE? ESG is significant, but tenure is not. Tenure is significant, but ESG is not. Neither ESG nor tenure is significant. C is correct. The t-statistic for tenure is 2.308, incating significanthe 0.027 level but not the 0.01 level. The t-statistic for ESG is 1.201, with a p-value of 0.238, whimeans we fail to rejethe null hypothesis for ESG the 0.01 significanlevel. 老师好， 这里题目要看这两个东西是否是显著的 所以原假设是该两个变量不显著 Ha是该两个变量是显著的是吗? Ha 一般是题目研究的东西 对吗? 谢谢。

2020-07-15 16:21 1 · 回答