问题如下图：
选项：
A. 
B. 
C. 
解释：
老师能解释下这道题什么意思吗？没看懂呢
品职辅导员_小明 · 2018年11月02日
S同学在一家broker公司工作，他预测W公司明年的分红会增加1.5，
所以这个dividend increase是基于他自己的预测。dividend increase能否实现，取决于pending legislation能否通过，这个条件说明了这个信息是公开信息，所以不是内幕信息。
然后后面又说了 这个representative给他说的话， 即表达了乐观的一面，又有不乐观的一面，而且纯属猜测：concern of，could cause等。没有明确表示是否会通过 ，所以A选项不对
C说的是，S同学违反准则，是因为他的research基于的是对政府行为未知的预测。
这很正常啊，我们做研究都是基于自己的对未知事情的看法，如果都已经是肯定的事情，也不用分析师来分析了。
但这个人的问题在于这是他的预测，是他自己的opinion,但他表达出来的意思是肯定的，是fact（他说div will increase,但其实是不一定的)
chyje2007 · 2018年11月05日
但最后他表达观点都是说 expect 也是预测呀？
品职辅导员_小明 · 2018年11月05日
所以他没有分清楚事实和opinion
NO.PZ2016032801000010问题如下Scott works for a regionbrokerage firm. He estimates thWalkton Instries will increase its vinUS$1.50 a share ring the next year. He realizes ththis increase is contingent on penng legislation thwoul if enacte give Walkton a substantitbreak. The US representative for Walkton’s home strihtolScott that, although she is lobbying harfor the bill anprospects for its passage are favorable, concern of the US Congress over the ferficit coulcause the tbill to votewn. Walkton Instries hnot ma any statements about a change in vinpolicy. Scott writes in his researreport, \"We expeWalkton’s stoprito rise least US$8.00 a share the enof the yebecause the vinwill increase US$1.50 a share. Investors buying the stothe current time shoulexpeto realize a totreturn of least 15% on the stock.\" Accorng to the Stanr:A.Scott violatethe Stanr because he usemateriinsi information.B.Scott violatethe Stanr because he faileto separate opinion from fact.C.Scott violatethe Stanr basing his researon uncertain prections of future government action.B is correct.This question relates to StanrV(–Communication with Clients anProspective Clients. Scott hissuea researreport stating thhe expects the priof Walkton Instries stoto rise US$8 a share \"because the vinwill increase\" US$1.50 per share. He hma this statement knowing ththe vinwill increase only if Congress enacts certain legislation, uncertain prospect. stating ththe vinwill increase, Scott faileto separate fafrom opinion. The information regarng passage of legislation is not materinonpublic information because it is conjecture, anthe question es not state whether the US representative gave Scott her opinion on the passage of the legislation in confince. She coulhave been offering this opinion to anyone who aske Therefore, statement A is incorrect. It macceptable to base a recommention, in part, on expectation of future events, even though they muncertain. Therefore, answer C is incorrect.有expect表示观点为什么还说主人公没有区分事实和观点，实际上分析师写报告也不能通篇we expehope呀，写一个就够了吧
NO.PZ2016032801000010 不是有代表告诉他信息么？信息属于小道消息么~那B的理解呢？没想太明白
Scott violatethe Stanr because he faileto separate opinion from fact. Scott violatethe Stanr basing his researon uncertain prections of future government action. B is correct. This question relates to StanrV(–Communication with Clients anProspective Clients. Scott hissuea researreport stating thhe expects the priof Walkton Instries stoto rise US$8 a share \"because the vinwill increase\" US$1.50 per share. He hma this statement knowing ththe vinwill increase only if Congress enacts certain legislation, uncertain prospect. stating ththe vinwill increase, Scott faileto separate fafrom opinion. The information regarng passage of legislation is not materinonpublic information because it is conjecture, anthe question es not state whether the US representative gave Scott her opinion on the passage of the legislation in confince. She coulhave been offering this opinion to anyone who aske Therefore, statement A is incorrect. It macceptable to base a recommention, in part, on expectation of future events, even though they muncertain. Therefore, answer C is incorrect.他说的“we expect” 不就是他自己的opinion吗？怎么判断应该看这里的动词还是后面的will increase啊？感觉前面是观点后面是事实
没看懂过往关于C的，麻烦请再说一次，谢谢
老师，我想问问，如果他分得清faopinion, 他的表述应该是什么样的呢？ 是不是应该说 we think/assume ....v coulincrease ....? 这样吗？