开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

气体密度计 · 2025年03月27日

这题A为什么不对

NO.PZ2025022501000074

问题如下:

With respect to standardized frameworks to assess materiality:

选项:

A.factors that are not financially material are typically included. B.companies in the same sector will have the same material ESG factors. C.developing proprietary materiality assessments alongside standardized frameworks continues to be important.

解释:

C is correct because materiality is typically measured in terms of both the likelihood and magnitude of impact. Note that many practitioners focus exclusively on material ESG factors. Determining which ESG issues are most material involves judgment and is not an exact science. Frameworks such as the materiality maps provided by SASB (now part of the ISSB) provide guidance, but investment professionals often develop their own view on what is most material.

解析说materiality maps provided by SASB (now part of the ISSB) provide guidance, but investment professionals often develop their own view on what is most material,但是non financial 部分也包含在内

1 个答案

净净_品职助教 · 2025年03月28日

嗨,努力学习的PZer你好:


A 选项错误,主要原因在于标准化框架(如 SASB 物料性地图)专注于财务上重要(financially material)的 ESG 因素,而不是所有 ESG 因素。虽然有些 ESG 因素可能具有非财务重要性(non-financial materiality),但 SASB 的框架和其他投资导向的方法通常不会专门纳入这些因素,除非它们对财务绩效有潜在影响


同学的这句话没太理解:解析说materiality maps provided by SASB (now part of the ISSB) provide guidance, but investment professionals often develop their own view on what is most material,但是non financial 部分也包含在内

解析力并没有说non financial 部分也包含在内

最后一句的翻译:诸如SASB(现在是ISSB的一部分)提供的重要性图之类的框架提供了指导,但投资专业人士通常对什么是最重要的有自己的看法。也就是说投资专业人士可能会根据自己的观点,来判断一些行业的重大ESG议题,并不一定要完全根据SASB的框架来进行分析研究

----------------------------------------------
虽然现在很辛苦,但努力过的感觉真的很好,加油!

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 4

    浏览
相关问题