开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

西红柿面 · 2025年03月27日

请问我这样回答可以吗

NO.PZ2022123002000022

问题如下:

One of the non-EUR currency exposures in the Portfolio is GBP. Aron frequently adjusts his GBP positions based on his short-term tactical outlook. Aron forecasts that the GBP will appreciate by 5% against the USD over the next six months. The current USD/GBP rate is 1.60 (1 GBP = 1.60 USD). Aron is considering the following six-month European option positions with the primary objective of increasing his GBP exposure in line with his forecast, and a secondary objective of minimizing the initial cash outlay:

Trade 1: Buy call with 1.68 strike

Sell call with 1.72 strike

Trade 2: Buy call with 1.60 strike

Sell call with 1.68 strike

Trade 3: Buy call with 1.60 strike

Sell call with 1.72 strike

Determine the trade that will most likely satisfy Aron’s objectives at expiration. Justify your response.

选项:

解释:

Correct Answer:

Trade 2 would be the most likely to satisfy Aron’s objectives. By buying a call struck at the current spot rate (1.60), Aron will benefit if GBP appreciates per his outlook. Selling the higher strike price out-of-the-money call at 1.68 (equal to his 5% appreciation expectation) would provide some premium income to reduce the cost of the trade, while not reducing his potential appreciation below 5%.

Trade 1 is ineffective because it does not provide upside exposure between the current spot of 1.60 and the current spot plus 5% of the expected 1.68, on expiration date.

Trade 3 is less effective than Trade 2 because the premium income from selling the call with a 1.72 strike is less than that from selling a call with a 1.68 strike. This trade is less effective at satisfying Aron’s secondary objective, which is to minimize the initial cash outlay.

Trade 2 is most suitable. 

The primary objective of increasing his GBP exposure in line with his forecast, and a secondary objective of minimizing the initial cash outlay. He estimated a appreciate of 5% against the USD over the next six months so the final currency rate would be around 1.68 USD/BDP. Having a positive view of USD appreciation, he can long call of GBP ATM in order to gain all the benefit for the appreciation. So the first objective fulfilled. For the second objective, he estimated the maximum of GBP appreciation would be 5% so he could sell a call at 1.68 USD/BDP in order to minimize the initial cash outlay. This Option has a low possibility of reaching to its strike price so the second objective fulfilled.

1 个答案

李坏_品职助教 · 2025年03月27日

嗨,努力学习的PZer你好:


可以的,注意英镑的代码是GBP,不是BDP,你可能不小心写错了吧。



----------------------------------------------
就算太阳没有迎着我们而来,我们正在朝着它而去,加油!

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 4

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ2022123002000022问题如下 One of the non-EUR currencyexposures in the Portfolio is GBP. Aron frequently austs his Gpositionsbaseon his short-term tacticoutlook. Aron forecasts ththe Gwillappreciate 5% against the USover the next six months. The current USGBPrate is 1.60 (1 G= 1.60 US. Aron is consiring the following six-monthEuropeoption positions with the primary objective of increasing his GBPexposure in line with his forecast, ana seconry objective of minimizing theiniticash outlay:Tra 1: Buy call with 1.68 strikeSell call with 1.72 strikeTra 2: Buy call with 1.60 strikeSell call with 1.68 strikeTra 3: Buy call with 1.60 strikeSell call with 1.72 striketermine thetra thwill most likely satisfy Aron’s objectives expiration. Justifyyour response. CorreAnswer: Tra 2 woulbethe most likely to satisfy Aron’s objectives. buying a call struthecurrent spot rate (1.60), Aron will benefit if Gappreciates per his outlook.Selling the higher strike priout-of-the-money call 1.68 (equto his 5%appreciation expectation) woulprovi some premium income to rethe costof the tra, while not recing his potentiappreciation below 5%.Tra 1 isineffective because it es not provi upsi exposure between the currentspot of 1.60 anthe current spot plus 5% of the expecte1.68, on expirationte.Tra 3 is lesseffective thTra 2 because the premium income from selling the call with a1.72 strike is less ththfrom selling a call with a 1.68 strike. Thistra is less effective satisfying Aron’s seconry objective, whiis tominimize the initicash outlay. 请问怎么理解short1.68,不会影响appreciation减少的意思啊?call=1.68或者1.72,都不会行权吧?shortcall就是光赚期权费了吧?

2024-10-25 20:30 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2022123002000022 问题如下 One of the non-EUR currencyexposures in the Portfolio is GBP. Aron frequently austs his Gpositionsbaseon his short-term tacticoutlook. Aron forecasts ththe Gwillappreciate 5% against the USover the next six months. The current USGBPrate is 1.60 (1 G= 1.60 US. Aron is consiring the following six-monthEuropeoption positions with the primary objective of increasing his GBPexposure in line with his forecast, ana seconry objective of minimizing theiniticash outlay:Tra 1: Buy call with 1.68 strikeSell call with 1.72 strikeTra 2: Buy call with 1.60 strikeSell call with 1.68 strikeTra 3: Buy call with 1.60 strikeSell call with 1.72 striketermine thetra thwill most likely satisfy Aron’s objectives expiration. Justifyyour response. CorreAnswer: Tra 2 woulbethe most likely to satisfy Aron’s objectives. buying a call struthecurrent spot rate (1.60), Aron will benefit if Gappreciates per his outlook.Selling the higher strike priout-of-the-money call 1.68 (equto his 5%appreciation expectation) woulprovi some premium income to rethe costof the tra, while not recing his potentiappreciation below 5%.Tra 1 isineffective because it es not provi upsi exposure between the currentspot of 1.60 anthe current spot plus 5% of the expecte1.68, on expirationte.Tra 3 is lesseffective thTra 2 because the premium income from selling the call with a1.72 strike is less ththfrom selling a call with a 1.68 strike. Thistra is less effective satisfying Aron’s seconry objective, whiis tominimize the initicash outlay. 老师好,我有个疑问题目中说”one of the non-EUR currenexposures in the portfolio is GBP\",应该怎么理解这句话?是指这个人开始就已经拥有GBP的头寸,还是说后面要换成GBP?不是很理解为什么要long call来获得Gexposure?谢谢!

2024-08-11 12:36 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2022123002000022 问题如下 One of the non-EUR currencyexposures in the Portfolio is GBP. Aron frequently austs his Gpositionsbaseon his short-term tacticoutlook. Aron forecasts ththe Gwillappreciate 5% against the USover the next six months. The current USGBPrate is 1.60 (1 G= 1.60 US. Aron is consiring the following six-monthEuropeoption positions with the primary objective of increasing his GBPexposure in line with his forecast, ana seconry objective of minimizing theiniticash outlay:Tra 1: Buy call with 1.68 strikeSell call with 1.72 strikeTra 2: Buy call with 1.60 strikeSell call with 1.68 strikeTra 3: Buy call with 1.60 strikeSell call with 1.72 striketermine thetra thwill most likely satisfy Aron’s objectives expiration. Justifyyour response. CorreAnswer: Tra 2 woulbethe most likely to satisfy Aron’s objectives. buying a call struthecurrent spot rate (1.60), Aron will benefit if Gappreciates per his outlook.Selling the higher strike priout-of-the-money call 1.68 (equto his 5%appreciation expectation) woulprovi some premium income to rethe costof the tra, while not recing his potentiappreciation below 5%.Tra 1 isineffective because it es not provi upsi exposure between the currentspot of 1.60 anthe current spot plus 5% of the expecte1.68, on expirationte.Tra 3 is lesseffective thTra 2 because the premium income from selling the call with a1.72 strike is less ththfrom selling a call with a 1.68 strike. Thistra is less effective satisfying Aron’s seconry objective, whiis tominimize the initicash outlay. 请问老师 这样答可以吗

2024-01-06 05:24 1 · 回答