开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

西红柿面 · 2025年03月24日

请问我这样回答可以吗

* 问题详情,请 查看题干

NO.PZ202212280100005201

问题如下:

Emma Young, a 47-year-old single mother of two daughters, ages 7 and 10, recently sold a business for $5.5 million net of taxes and put the proceeds into a money market account. Her other assets include a tax-deferred retirement account worth $3.0 million, a $500,000 after-tax account designated for her daughters’ education, a $400,000 after-tax account for unexpected needs, and her home, which she owns outright. Her living expenses are fully covered by her job. Young wants to retire in 15 years and to fund her retirement from existing assets.


(1) The broker suggests that Young rebalance her $5.5 million money market account and the $3.0 million tax-deferred retirement account periodically in order to maintain their targeted allocations. The broker proposes the same risk profile for the equity positions with two potential target equity allocations and rebalancing ranges for the two accounts as follows:

· Alternative 1: 80% equities +/– 8.0% rebalancing range

· Alternative 2: 75% equities +/– 10.7% rebalancing range

Determine which alternative best fits each account.


选项:

解释:

When doing the rebalance, we have to consider the cost of rebalance and the benefit of rebalance. 

$5.5 million money market account: 

Money market account is taxable and account who is taxable require a large rebalancing range in order to reduce the rebalance cost. High frequent of rebalance would increase the frequency of transaction and for taxable account more tax cost would be generated. Alternative 2: 75% equities +/– 10.7% rebalancing range has a higher rebalance range.

$3.0 million tax-deferred retirement account: tax-deferred retirement account is tax-deferred so that we can do the rebalance at a higher frequency. Alternative 1: 80% equities +/– 8.0% rebalancing range is more suitable.

1 个答案

Lucky_品职助教 · 2025年03月25日

嗨,从没放弃的小努力你好:


题目解析强调了税前和税后波动率不同对再平衡区间的影响,而你没有提及这一点。在实际金融市场中,波动率是资产配置和再平衡决策的重要考量因素,这使得你的回答不够全面。

说递延税收退休账户可以更高频率地进行再平衡并不完全准确。更合理的解释是,由于其税收递延的特点,再平衡时不需要像应税账户那样考虑立即产生的税收成本,所以相对应税账户,其再平衡范围可以窄一些,重点还是在波动率和税收影响综合考量上,而不是简单的再平衡频率。


----------------------------------------------
加油吧,让我们一起遇见更好的自己!

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 6

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ202212280100005201 问题如下 (1) The brokersuggests thYoung rebalanher $5.5 million money market account anthe$3.0 million tax-ferreretirement account periocally in orr to maintaintheir targeteallocations. The broker proposes the same risk profile for theequity positions with two potentitarget equity allocations anrebalancingranges for the two accounts follows:· Alternative 1: 80% equities +/–8.0% rebalancing range· Alternative 2: 75% equities +/–10.7% rebalancing rangeterminewhialternative bestfits eaaccount. 根据个人IPS中的内容,tefficient asset应该放在tinefficient account中,因为Alternative 1中的权益比例高,所以Alternative1 应该放在taxable account中,就是5.5million accountrebalanrange越窄,equity rebalance越频繁,越容易出发tloss harvesting。Alternative 1中的rebalanrange窄,所以Alternative 1应该放在taxable account中,就是5.5million account麻烦老师看一下,为什么这两个理由在这里不能成立呢?另外想请教一下老师,在这种案例分析题目中,我应该怎么确定,是从tefficient的角度分析还是从risk tolerance的角度分析呢?

2024-07-18 19:56 4 · 回答

NO.PZ202212280100005201 问题如下 (1) The brokersuggests thYoung rebalanher $5.5 million money market account anthe$3.0 million tax-ferreretirement account periocally in orr to maintaintheir targeteallocations. The broker proposes the same risk profile for theequity positions with two potentitarget equity allocations anrebalancingranges for the two accounts follows:· Alternative 1: 80% equities +/–8.0% rebalancing range· Alternative 2: 75% equities +/–10.7% rebalancing rangeterminewhialternative bestfits eaaccount. 老师你好,题目中的net of tax账户是after-tax的,我理解这是一个新的说法,说的是进来的钱已经扣税了?我记得个人IPS里面讲到的1) taxable, 2) T, 3) TEA都假设钱进来是pre-tax的?

2024-06-28 08:39 1 · 回答

NO.PZ202212280100005201 问题如下 (1) The brokersuggests thYoung rebalanher $5.5 million money market account anthe$3.0 million tax-ferreretirement account periocally in orr to maintaintheir targeteallocations. The broker proposes the same risk profile for theequity positions with two potentitarget equity allocations anrebalancingranges for the two accounts follows:· Alternative 1: 80% equities +/–8.0% rebalancing range· Alternative 2: 75% equities +/–10.7% rebalancing rangeterminewhialternative bestfits eaaccount. alternative 2 fits $5.5 million money market account. this account is a money market account, we shoulconsir the tissue when temine the alternative. e to the wir rebalanrange of alternative 2, it will make the tmore efficient anprovi a higher return after-tax. so alternative 2 fits $5.5 million money market account. alternative 1 fits $3.0 million tax-ferreretirement account.young will retire in 15 years anher living expense are fully covereher joit is more important to fouon the growth of the account. the equity allocation of alternative is higher ththe allocation of alternative 2. it mightl provi a higher return unr the same risk. this retirement account is a tax-ferreaccount, the alternative coulhave a narrower rebalancing range. so alternative 1 will fits $3.0 million tax-ferreretirement account.

2024-01-08 15:42 1 · 回答

NO.PZ202212280100005201问题如下 (1) The brokersuggests thYoung rebalanher $5.5 million money market account anthe$3.0 million tax-ferreretirement account periocally in orr to maintaintheir targeteallocations. The broker proposes the same risk profile for theequity positions with two potentitarget equity allocations anrebalancingranges for the two accounts follows:· Alternative 1: 80% equities +/–8.0% rebalancing range· Alternative 2: 75% equities +/–10.7% rebalancing rangeterminewhialternative bestfits eaaccount. 如题,答案中关于5.5million的这个账户可以再详细一下吗?谢谢

2023-11-24 09:29 1 · 回答