开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

西红柿面 · 2025年03月24日

请问我这么回答可以吗?

NO.PZ2022122801000012

问题如下:

Roggen Family Charitable Foundation (RFCF)’s current portfolio is valued at EUR 250 million, with 50% in equities and 50% in fixed income. The portfolio’s equity holdings are in a fund tracking a broad index of EUR-denominated stocks; the fixed-income holdings are in a fund tracking an all-maturity index of EUR- denominated government bonds.

To better diversify the policy asset allocation globally, Loucks specifically recommends that Roggen consider adding the following four asset classes:

Ÿ Non-EUR developed market equities

Ÿ Emerging market equities

Ÿ Broad EUR fixed income, including government and credit

Ÿ Alternative investments, including real estate, commodities, and private equity

Discuss, with two reasons, why the set of six asset classes (current portfolio plus Loucks’ recommendations) for the RFCF policy asset allocation are not appropriately specified.

选项:

解释:

There are five criteria that should be met for a set of asset classes to be appropriately specified:

Ÿ Assets within an asset class should be relatively homogeneous

Ÿ Asset classes should be mutually exclusive

Ÿ Asset classes should be diversifying

Ÿ The asset classes as a group should make up a preponderance of world investable wealth

Ÿ The asset class should have the capacity to absorb a significant fraction of the investor’s portfolio without seriously affecting the portfolio’s liquidity

Loucks’ set of six asset classes is not appropriately specified because:

1) Adding broad EUR fixed income exposure violates the second criterion – that asset classes should be mutually exclusive. RFCF already has exposure to EUR-denominated government bonds. The broad EUR fixed income exposure contains both EUR-denominated government bonds and EUR-denominated credit bonds. This addition creates overlap between the existing asset class and the new asset class.

2) Even if all four of the recommended asset classes are added, the fourth criterion is not satisfied: the RFCF portfolio would still not have any exposure to non-EUR bonds (and potentially other asset classes).

3) Placing real estate, commodities, and private equity into a single asset class violates the first criterion: assets within an asset class should be relatively homogeneous.

Asset classes should be mutually exclusive. Having Emerging market equities and Non-EUR developed market equities asset classes category is not mutually exclusive. Because Emerging market equities overlap some of the Non-EUR developed market equities.

Asset classes should be diversifying. The orginal asset class is the fixed-income holdings are in a fund tracking an all-maturity index of EUR- denominated government bond and the new asset class include Broad EUR fixed income, including government and credit. The correlation among those two asset class is too high and asset classes are not diversifying.

1 个答案

Lucky_品职助教 · 2025年03月25日

嗨,从没放弃的小努力你好:


关于mutually exclusive的回答:Emerging market equities和Non-EUR developed market equities这两个资产类别实际上是相互排斥的。新兴市场通常是指经济发展程度相对较低、资本市场不够成熟的国家或地区,与发达市场在经济、市场特征等方面差异明显 ,不存在明显重叠,所以你这部分的观点错误。

关于diversifying的回答:原资产类别中是追踪欧元区政府债券全期限指数的基金,新增的广义欧元区固定收益资产类别包含政府债券和信贷债券,两者相关性高这一点没错。但你提及的原因与题目中给出的参考答案不一致,参考答案是从资产类别重叠导致违反互斥性标准的角度来分析新增广义欧元区固定收益资产类别的问题,而非从分散性角度。

----------------------------------------------
加油吧,让我们一起遇见更好的自己!

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 6

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ2022122801000012 问题如下 Roggen Family CharitableFountion (RFCF)’s current portfolio is valueEUR 250 million, with 50% inequities an50% in fixeincome. The portfolio’s equity holngs are in a funracking a broinx of EUR-nominatestocks; the fixeincome holngs arein a funtracking all-maturity inx of EUR- nominategovernment bon. To betterversify the poliasset allocation globally, Loucks specifically recommenthRoggen consir aing the following four asset classes:Ÿ Non-EUR velopemarketequitiesŸ Emerging market equitiesŸ BroEUR fixeincome, inclung government ancretŸ Alternative investments, inclung reestate, commoties, anrivate equityscuss, with two reasons, why the set of six asset classes (current portfolioplus Loucks’ recommentions) for the RFpoliasset allocation are notappropriately specifie There are fivecriteria thshoulmet for a set of asset classes to appropriatelyspecifieŸ Assets within asset classshoulrelatively homogeneousŸ Asset classes shoulmutually exclusiveŸ Asset classes shoulversifyingŸ The asset classes a group shoulmake up a preponranof worlnvestable wealthŸ The asset class shoulhave the capacity to absorb a significantfraction of the investor’s portfolio without seriously affecting the portfolio’sliquityLoucks’ set of sixasset classes is not appropriately specifiebecause:1) Aing broaUR fixeincome exposure violates the seconcriterion – thasset classesshoulmutually exclusive. RFalrea hexposure to EUR-nominateovernment bon. The broEUR fixeincome exposure contains bothEUR-nominategovernment bon anEUR-nominatecret bon. Thisaition creates overlbetween the existing asset class anthe new assetclass.2) Even if all fourof the recommenasset classes are ae the fourth criterion is notsatisfie the RFportfolio woulstill not have any exposure to non-EURbon (anpotentially other asset classes).3) Placing realestate, commoties, anprivate equity into a single asset class violates thefirst criterion: assets within asset class shoulrelatively homogeneous. PE的correlation和Equity是有的,所以这条算违反吗

2025-02-21 07:46 3 · 回答

NO.PZ2022122801000012 问题如下 Roggen Family CharitableFountion (RFCF)’s current portfolio is valueEUR 250 million, with 50% inequities an50% in fixeincome. The portfolio’s equity holngs are in a funracking a broinx of EUR-nominatestocks; the fixeincome holngs arein a funtracking all-maturity inx of EUR- nominategovernment bon. To betterversify the poliasset allocation globally, Loucks specifically recommenthRoggen consir aing the following four asset classes:Ÿ Non-EUR velopemarketequitiesŸ Emerging market equitiesŸ BroEUR fixeincome, inclung government ancretŸ Alternative investments, inclung reestate, commoties, anrivate equityscuss, with two reasons, why the set of six asset classes (current portfolioplus Loucks’ recommentions) for the RFpoliasset allocation are notappropriately specifie There are fivecriteria thshoulmet for a set of asset classes to appropriatelyspecifieŸ Assets within asset classshoulrelatively homogeneousŸ Asset classes shoulmutually exclusiveŸ Asset classes shoulversifyingŸ The asset classes a group shoulmake up a preponranof worlnvestable wealthŸ The asset class shoulhave the capacity to absorb a significantfraction of the investor’s portfolio without seriously affecting the portfolio’sliquityLoucks’ set of sixasset classes is not appropriately specifiebecause:1) Aing broaUR fixeincome exposure violates the seconcriterion – thasset classesshoulmutually exclusive. RFalrea hexposure to EUR-nominateovernment bon. The broEUR fixeincome exposure contains bothEUR-nominategovernment bon anEUR-nominatecret bon. Thisaition creates overlbetween the existing asset class anthe new assetclass.2) Even if all fourof the recommenasset classes are ae the fourth criterion is notsatisfie the RFportfolio woulstill not have any exposure to non-EURbon (anpotentially other asset classes).3) Placing realestate, commoties, anprivate equity into a single asset class violates thefirst criterion: assets within asset class shoulrelatively homogeneous. 回答的时候答了一个点,EUR-nominatestocks 包含了emerging equities,所以增加emerging market equities违反了mutally exclusive,这个算对吗?

2024-07-24 23:24 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2022122801000012问题如下 Roggen Family CharitableFountion (RFCF)’s current portfolio is valueEUR 250 million, with 50% inequities an50% in fixeincome. The portfolio’s equity holngs are in a funracking a broinx of EUR-nominatestocks; the fixeincome holngs arein a funtracking all-maturity inx of EUR- nominategovernment bon. To betterversify the poliasset allocation globally, Loucks specifically recommenthRoggen consir aing the following four asset classes:Ÿ Non-EUR velopemarketequitiesŸ Emerging market equitiesŸ BroEUR fixeincome, inclung government ancretŸ Alternative investments, inclung reestate, commoties, anrivate equityscuss, with two reasons, why the set of six asset classes (current portfolioplus Loucks’ recommentions) for the RFpoliasset allocation are notappropriately specifie There are fivecriteria thshoulmet for a set of asset classes to appropriatelyspecifieŸ Assets within asset classshoulrelatively homogeneousŸ Asset classes shoulmutually exclusiveŸ Asset classes shoulversifyingŸ The asset classes a group shoulmake up a preponranof worlnvestable wealthŸ The asset class shoulhave the capacity to absorb a significantfraction of the investor’s portfolio without seriously affecting the portfolio’sliquityLoucks’ set of sixasset classes is not appropriately specifiebecause:1) Aing broaUR fixeincome exposure violates the seconcriterion – thasset classesshoulmutually exclusive. RFalrea hexposure to EUR-nominateovernment bon. The broEUR fixeincome exposure contains bothEUR-nominategovernment bon anEUR-nominatecret bon. Thisaition creates overlbetween the existing asset class anthe new assetclass.2) Even if all fourof the recommenasset classes are ae the fourth criterion is notsatisfie the RFportfolio woulstill not have any exposure to non-EURbon (anpotentially other asset classes).3) Placing realestate, commoties, anprivate equity into a single asset class violates thefirst criterion: assets within asset class shoulrelatively homogeneous. 老师,能否以size角度分析不适合的原因?因为该基金size是250million,小于500million,属于small institution. 该基金现有组合外,有可能没有足够金额去投资另类,Alternatives are not investable。

2024-07-14 22:37 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2022122801000012 问题如下 Roggen Family CharitableFountion (RFCF)’s current portfolio is valueEUR 250 million, with 50% inequities an50% in fixeincome. The portfolio’s equity holngs are in a funracking a broinx of EUR-nominatestocks; the fixeincome holngs arein a funtracking all-maturity inx of EUR- nominategovernment bon. To betterversify the poliasset allocation globally, Loucks specifically recommenthRoggen consir aing the following four asset classes:Ÿ Non-EUR velopemarketequitiesŸ Emerging market equitiesŸ BroEUR fixeincome, inclung government ancretŸ Alternative investments, inclung reestate, commoties, anrivate equityscuss, with two reasons, why the set of six asset classes (current portfolioplus Loucks’ recommentions) for the RFpoliasset allocation are notappropriately specifie There are fivecriteria thshoulmet for a set of asset classes to appropriatelyspecifieŸ Assets within asset classshoulrelatively homogeneousŸ Asset classes shoulmutually exclusiveŸ Asset classes shoulversifyingŸ The asset classes a group shoulmake up a preponranof worlnvestable wealthŸ The asset class shoulhave the capacity to absorb a significantfraction of the investor’s portfolio without seriously affecting the portfolio’sliquityLoucks’ set of sixasset classes is not appropriately specifiebecause:1) Aing broaUR fixeincome exposure violates the seconcriterion – thasset classesshoulmutually exclusive. RFalrea hexposure to EUR-nominateovernment bon. The broEUR fixeincome exposure contains bothEUR-nominategovernment bon anEUR-nominatecret bon. Thisaition creates overlbetween the existing asset class anthe new assetclass.2) Even if all fourof the recommenasset classes are ae the fourth criterion is notsatisfie the RFportfolio woulstill not have any exposure to non-EURbon (anpotentially other asset classes).3) Placing realestate, commoties, anprivate equity into a single asset class violates thefirst criterion: assets within asset class shoulrelatively homogeneous. 在回答时, 直接写出两个原因就可以么? 需要写出asset的6点要求么?

2024-01-17 15:47 1 · 回答