NO.PZ201604030300004704
问题如下：
4. When resigning from Swibank, does Riser violate any CFA Institute Standards?
选项：
A.No.
B.Yes, because he breaches his duty of loyalty to his employer.
C.Yes, because he does not resign his position with the Luxembourg subsidiary.
解释：
A is correct.
No violation occurred. Riser is not required to resign his position with the subsidiary. Riser did not engage in any activities that would conflict with his employer’s interest before his resignation became effective.
上一题roiser就因为没有披露他和komm的关系而违反了。然后komm各种说服她，她被说服然后辞职换新公司，也就是说此时公司还是不知道他俩关系，因为从最开始推荐komm的时候她就没有公开。那本质上她就是对雇主不loyalty啊，明摆着是违反了的。
这事儿说白了就是r介绍了自己的老熟人给公司做管理，但r闭口不谈这层关系（此时已违反），最后被挖墙脚（没违反），结论是我对雇主是loyalty的。就不合理啊，在道德边缘游走
