开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

沈点点 · 2025年02月08日

几种组合的特点

NO.PZ2023032703000090

问题如下:

Adams and junior portfolio manager Frank Neeson review the fixed-income portfolios of two new defined benefit plan clients, Lawson Doors & Cabinets, Inc., and Wharton Farms.

Neeson comments, “The durations for almost half of the bonds in the Wharton portfolio are clustered around 4 years, and the durations of the remainder around 12 years, while the durations of the Lawson portfolio bonds are clustered between 6 years and 8 years. In general, a laddered bond portfolio approach would improve liquidity management for both, although the Lawson portfolio would experience an increase in cash flow reinvestment risk and the Wharton portfolio would experience a decrease in convexity.”

Is Neeson most likely correct in his assessment of the effects of a laddered bond portfolio approach on the Wharton and Lawson portfolios? (2019 mock AM)

选项:

A.

Yes

B.

No, because the Lawson portfolio is a bullet portfolio where the duration of its assets are matched to the duration of its liabilities

C.

No, because the duration of the Wharton liabilities is greater than that of the Lawson liabilities owing to the younger age of its participants

解释:

Correct Answer: A

A is correct. A laddered portfolio has lower convexity and dispersion than a barbell portfolio but more than a bullet portfolio, given comparable duration and cash flow yields. Lower convexity and dispersion are desirable aspects in liquidity management. In a laddered portfolio, there is always a bond close to redemption enhancing liquidity. As bonds mature, the final coupon and principal are available for distribution or can be reinvested in a long-term bond at the back of the ladder. The Wharton portfolio is more of a barbell, has higher convexity than the Lawson portfolio, and would see a larger reduction in cash flow reinvestment risk with the reduction of convexity.

Neither duration nor the projected life of the plan reveal the convexity or dispersion characteristics of the portfolio.

1.barbell是convexity最大,现金流最分散,reinvestment风险最大,流动性居中

bullet是convexity最小,现金流最集中,reinvestment风险最小,流动性最差

ladder是convexity居中,现金流居中,reinvestment风险居中,流动性最好

以上对吗?


2.分别在什么情况下需要用到barbell和bullet和ladder呢

0 个答案
  • 0

    回答
  • 1

    关注
  • 3

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ2023032703000090 问题如下 Ams anjunior portfolio managerFrank Neeson review the fixeincome portfolios of two new finebenefit planclients, Lawson ors Cabinets, Inc., anWharton Farms.Neeson comments,“The rations for almost half of the bon in the Wharton portfolio areclusterearoun4 years, anthe rations of the remainr aroun12 years,while the rations of the Lawson portfolio bon are clusterebetween 6 yearsan8 years. In general, a laerebonportfolio approawoulimprove liquitymanagement for both, although the Lawson portfolio woulexperienincreasein cash flow reinvestment risk anthe Wharton portfolio woulexperienacrease in convexity.”Is Neeson mostlikely correin his assessment of the effects of a laerebonportfolioapproaon the Wharton anLawson portfolios? (2019 moAM) A.Yes B.No, because the Lawson portfolio is a bullet portfolio where the ration of its assets are matcheto the ration of its liabilities C.No, because the ration of the Wharton liabilities is greater ththof the Lawson liabilities owing to the younger age of its participants CorreAnswer: is correct. A laereportfolio hlower convexity anspersion tha barbell portfolio but more tha bullet portfolio, given comparable ration ancash flow yiel. Lower convexity anspersion are sirable aspects in liquity management. In a laereportfolio, there is always a bonclose to remption enhancing liquity. bon mature, the fincoupon anprincipare available for stribution or creinvestein a long-term bonthe baof the laer. The Wharton portfolio is more of a barbell, hhigher convexity ththe Lawson portfolio, anwoulsee a larger rection in cash flow reinvestment risk with the rection of convexity.Neither ration nor the projectelife of the plrevethe convexity or spersion characteristiof the portfolio. Wharton portfolio 有一半是4年的,有一半是12年的,属于laereportfolio,应该有较大的reinvestment risk,然后又说 “Lawson portfolio woulexperienincrease in cash flow reinvestment risk” 这里不是说错了吗?为什么答案选A,说是正确的呢?

2025-01-17 15:00 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2023032703000090 问题如下 Ams anjunior portfolio managerFrank Neeson review the fixeincome portfolios of two new finebenefit planclients, Lawson ors Cabinets, Inc., anWharton Farms.Neeson comments,“The rations for almost half of the bon in the Wharton portfolio areclusterearoun4 years, anthe rations of the remainr aroun12 years,while the rations of the Lawson portfolio bon are clusterebetween 6 yearsan8 years. In general, a laerebonportfolio approawoulimprove liquitymanagement for both, although the Lawson portfolio woulexperienincreasein cash flow reinvestment risk anthe Wharton portfolio woulexperienacrease in convexity.”Is Neeson mostlikely correin his assessment of the effects of a laerebonportfolioapproaon the Wharton anLawson portfolios? (2019 moAM) A.Yes B.No, because the Lawson portfolio is a bullet portfolio where the ration of its assets are matcheto the ration of its liabilities C.No, because the ration of the Wharton liabilities is greater ththof the Lawson liabilities owing to the younger age of its participants CorreAnswer: is correct. A laereportfolio hlower convexity anspersion tha barbell portfolio but more tha bullet portfolio, given comparable ration ancash flow yiel. Lower convexity anspersion are sirable aspects in liquity management. In a laereportfolio, there is always a bonclose to remption enhancing liquity. bon mature, the fincoupon anprincipare available for stribution or creinvestein a long-term bonthe baof the laer. The Wharton portfolio is more of a barbell, hhigher convexity ththe Lawson portfolio, anwoulsee a larger rection in cash flow reinvestment risk with the rection of convexity.Neither ration nor the projectelife of the plrevethe convexity or spersion characteristiof the portfolio. \"although the Lawson portfolio woulexperienincrease in cash flow reinvestment risk anthe Wharton portfolio woulexperiena crease in convexity.\"题目中的这句话不对啊,Lawson 是 laereportfolio, wharton是 bullet portfolio。为什么Lawson 有 cash flow reinvestment risk呢?还有怎么理解wharton woulexperiena crease in convexity?

2024-12-23 03:34 2 · 回答