开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

沈点点 · 2025年02月06日

correlation的高估和低估

* 问题详情,请 查看题干

NO.PZ202206070100000102

问题如下:

Brian O'Reilly Case Scenario

Brian O’Reilly is a capital markets consultant for the Tennessee Teachers’ Retirement System (TTRS). O’Reilly is meeting with the TTRS board to present his capital market expectations for the next year. Board member Kay Durden asks O’Reilly about the possibility that data measurement biases exist in historical data. O’Reilly responds:

“One bias results from the use of appraisal data in the absence of market transaction data. Appraisal values tend to be less volatile than market determined values for identical assets. As a result, measured volatilities are biased downward and correlations with other assets tend to be exaggerated.”

Board member Arnold Brown asks O’Reilly about the use of high-frequency (daily) data in developing capital market expectations. O’Reilly answers, “Sometimes it is necessary to use daily data to obtain a data series of the desired length. Ironically, high-frequency data improves the precision of sample variances, covariances, and correlations but not the precision of the sample mean. High-frequency data are more sensitive to asynchronism across variables.”

Durden states that he recently read an article on psychological biases related to making accurate and unbiased forecasts. She asks O’Reilly to inform the board about the anchoringand prudence biases. O’Reilly offers the following explanation:

“The anchoring bias is the tendency for forecasts to be overly influenced by the memory of catastrophic or dramatic past events that are anchored in a person’s memory. The confirming evidence trap is the bias that leads individuals to give greater weight to information that supports a preferred viewpoint than to evidence that contradicts it.”

The board asks about forecasting expected returns for major markets, given that price earnings ratios are not constant over time and that many companies are repurchasing shares instead of increasing cash dividends. O’Reilly responds that the Grinold–Kroner model accounts for those factors and then makes the following forecasts for the European equity market:

  • The dividend yield will be 1.95%.

  • Shares outstanding will decline 1.00%.

  • The long-term inflation rate will be 1.75% per year.

  • An expansion rate for P/E multiples will be 0.15% per year.

  • The long-term corporate earnings growth premium will be 1% above expected real GDP growth.

  • Expected real GDP growth will be 2.5% per year.

  • The risk-free rate will be 2.0%.

Question
With respect to his answer to Brown’s question, O’Reilly is most likely:

选项:

A.correct.

B.incorrect with respect to asynchronism.

C.incorrect with respect to variances and correlations.

解释:

Solution

A is correct. O’Reilly’s answer is entirely correct as stated.

B is incorrect. O’Reilly’s answer is entirely correct as stated. High-frequency data are more sensitive to asynchronism.

C is incorrect. O’Reilly’s answer is entirely correct as stated. High-frequency data produce more precise variances and co-variances (and less precise means).

A是正确的。O’Reilly的回答完全正确。

B是错误的。高频数据对异步更加敏感,即高频数据更容易产生异步性的问题。比如用每天的数据观测美国和欧洲股票市场,因为两地存有时差,所以就会出现异步性。但如果是用月度数据观测,这种时差就可以忽略不计。

C是错误的。高频数据产生了更大容量的样本数据,所以能估计出更精确的方差和协方差。但是对于均值而言,只要用的历史数据,估计的数值就不太精确。这也是根据实务观测到的结果。

1.appraisal data会高估还是低估correlation?

2.asynchronous会高估还是低估correlation?

0 个答案
  • 0

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 2

    浏览
相关问题

错误 平滑后相关性应该是低估啊https://class.pzacamy.com/qa/146623

2024-12-27 18:02 1 · 回答

NO.PZ202206070100000102 问题如下 With respeto his answer to Brown’s question, O’Reilly is most likely: A.correct. B.incorrewith respeto asynchronism. C.incorrewith respeto variances ancorrelations. SolutionA is correct. O’Reilly’s answer is entirely correstate B is incorrect. O’Reilly’s answer is entirely correstate High-frequenta are more sensitive to asynchronism.C is incorrect. O’Reilly’s answer is entirely correstate High-frequenta promore precise variances anco-variances (anless precise means).A是正确的。O’Reilly的回答完全正确。B是错误的。高频数据对异步更加敏感,即高频数据更容易产生异步性的问题。比如用每天的数据观测美国和欧洲股票市场,因为两地存有时差,所以就会出现异步性。但如果是用月度数据观测,这种时差就可以忽略不计。C是错误的。高频数据产生了更大容量的样本数据,所以能估计出更精确的方差和协方差。但是对于均值而言,只要用的历史数据,估计的数值就不太精确。这也是根据实务观测到的结果。 为什么不选C

2024-07-07 09:34 1 · 回答

NO.PZ202206070100000102 问题如下 With respeto his answer to Brown’s question, O’Reilly is most likely: A.correct. B.incorrewith respeto asynchronism. C.incorrewith respeto variances ancorrelations. SolutionA is correct. O’Reilly’s answer is entirely correstate B is incorrect. O’Reilly’s answer is entirely correstate High-frequenta are more sensitive to asynchronism.C is incorrect. O’Reilly’s answer is entirely correstate High-frequenta promore precise variances anco-variances (anless precise means).A是正确的。O’Reilly的回答完全正确。B是错误的。高频数据对异步更加敏感,即高频数据更容易产生异步性的问题。比如用每天的数据观测美国和欧洲股票市场,因为两地存有时差,所以就会出现异步性。但如果是用月度数据观测,这种时差就可以忽略不计。C是错误的。高频数据产生了更大容量的样本数据,所以能估计出更精确的方差和协方差。但是对于均值而言,只要用的历史数据,估计的数值就不太精确。这也是根据实务观测到的结果。 另一道题目链接https://class.pzacamy.com/qa/150728这类似题目中,答案指向是high-frequenta tento prolower correlation estimates但是这道题中,题目指向是high-frequenta improves the precision of sample variances, covariances, ancorrelations but not the precision of the sample mean.所以我想请教的是,是我的理解有问题,还是这两个结论是矛盾的?

2024-02-07 10:39 1 · 回答

NO.PZ202206070100000102 问题如下 With respeto his answer to Brown’s question, O’Reilly is most likely: A.correct. B.incorrewith respeto asynchronism. C.incorrewith respeto variances ancorrelations. SolutionA is correct. O’Reilly’s answer is entirely correstate B is incorrect. O’Reilly’s answer is entirely correstate High-frequenta are more sensitive to asynchronism.C is incorrect. O’Reilly’s answer is entirely correstate High-frequenta promore precise variances anco-variances (anless precise means).A是正确的。O’Reilly的回答完全正确。B是错误的。高频数据对异步更加敏感,即高频数据更容易产生异步性的问题。比如用每天的数据观测美国和欧洲股票市场,因为两地存有时差,所以就会出现异步性。但如果是用月度数据观测,这种时差就可以忽略不计。C是错误的。高频数据产生了更大容量的样本数据,所以能估计出更精确的方差和协方差。但是对于均值而言,只要用的历史数据,估计的数值就太精确。这也是根据实务观测到的结果。 答案讲解是不是少一个字? 不太精确吧

2023-05-11 18:54 1 · 回答

NO.PZ202206070100000102问题如下With respeto his answer to Brown’s question, O’Reilly is most likely:A.correct.B.incorrewith respeto asynchronism.C.incorrewith respeto variances ancorrelations. SolutionA is correct. O’Reilly’s answer is entirely correstate B is incorrect. O’Reilly’s answer is entirely correstate High-frequenta are more sensitive to asynchronism.C is incorrect. O’Reilly’s answer is entirely correstate High-frequenta promore precise variances anco-variances (anless precise means).A是正确的。O’Reilly的回答完全正确。B是错误的。高频数据对异步更加敏感,即高频数据更容易产生异步性的问题。比如用每天的数据观测美国和欧洲股票市场,因为两地存有时差,所以就会出现异步性。但如果是用月度数据观测,这种时差就可以忽略不计。C是错误的。高频数据产生了更大容量的样本数据,所以能估计出更精确的方差和协方差。但是对于均值而言,只要用的历史数据,估计的数值就太精确。这也是根据实务观测到的结果。 1是,原版书哪里提到这个2是,方差和协方差的计算都要用到均值,方差和协方差会更精确,均值却less 精确了,不太能理解。有没有理论逻辑上的,为什么高频反而会得出不精确的均值

2022-12-11 12:49 1 · 回答