开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

monicaaaaa · 2025年01月29日

cost benefit range

* 问题详情,请 查看题干

NO.PZ202204250100001504

问题如下:

Which of West’s statements regarding rebalancing ranges is least likely correct?

选项:

A.

Statement 1.

B.

Statement 2.

C.Statement 3.

解释:

Correct Answer: C

Statement 3 is incorrect. Rebalancing ranges for non-US developed equity should be wider than US equity under the cost-benefit (not proportional range) because it has higher transaction costs. Rebalancing ranges under the proportional range approach are defined as +/– 600 basis points for all asset classes in this example and are computed as follows.

Rebalancing ranges for bonds under the proportional range approach:

20% × (1 + 600 bps) = 20% × 1.06 = 21.2%

20% × (1 – 600 bps) = 20% × 0.94 = 18.8%

Hypothetical Rebalancing Ranges under Three Different Approaches


答案里的cost benefit range怎么填出来的

1 个答案

Lucky_品职助教 · 2025年01月29日

嗨,爱思考的PZer你好:


同学你好:


这道题的题干中,没有明确给出 “cost - benefit range” 具体的计算方式,但可依据投资组合管理的一般原理进行合理推测。在投资决策中,成本效益分析会综合考量多种因素,对于投资组合的再平衡范围设定,会重点权衡交易成本与潜在收益。

这个知识点书上只提到了一处,我觉得这道题如果不是没给齐信息,那么题目中的这个答案其实是一个估计的数,因为书上只说了cost-benefit会宽一些,因此不是算出来的,只是根据性质写的。

比如说,非美国发达市场股票,其再平衡范围设定为 16% - 24%,比美国股票(47% - 53%)宽。主要原因是其交易成本高,为避免因微小价格波动就频繁交易,所以设置了更宽的再平衡范围 。同时,可能由于其与组合中其他资产相关性和波动性等因素综合作用,也支持了较宽的再平衡范围设定。



----------------------------------------------
就算太阳没有迎着我们而来,我们正在朝着它而去,加油!

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 4

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ202204250100001504 问题如下 Whiof West’s statements regarng rebalancing ranges is least likely correct? A.Statement 1. B.Statement 2. C.Statement 3. CorreAnswer: CStatement 3 is incorrect. Rebalancing ranges for non-USvelopeequity shoulwir thUS equity unr the cost-benefit (notproportionrange) because it hhigher transaction costs. Rebalancing rangesunr the proportionrange approaare fine+/– 600 basis points forall asset classes in this example anare computefollows. Rebalancing rangesfor bon unr the proportionrange approach:20% × (1 + 600bps) = 20% × 1.06 = 21.2% 20% × (1 – 600bps) = 20% × 0.94 = 18.8%HypotheticalRebalancing Ranges unr Three fferent Approaches 如题,Statement 2没有看懂

2025-01-01 14:33 1 · 回答

NO.PZ202204250100001504 问题如下 Whiof West’s statements regarng rebalancing ranges is least likely correct? A.Statement 1. B.Statement 2. C.Statement 3. CorreAnswer: CStatement 3 is incorrect. Rebalancing ranges for non-USvelopeequity shoulwir thUS equity unr the cost-benefit (notproportionrange) because it hhigher transaction costs. Rebalancing rangesunr the proportionrange approaare fine+/– 600 basis points forall asset classes in this example anare computefollows. Rebalancing rangesfor bon unr the proportionrange approach:20% × (1 + 600bps) = 20% × 1.06 = 21.2% 20% × (1 – 600bps) = 20% × 0.94 = 18.8%HypotheticalRebalancing Ranges unr Three fferent Approaches +/– 600 basis points

2024-12-31 11:50 1 · 回答

NO.PZ202204250100001504 问题如下 Whiof West’s statements regarng rebalancing ranges is least likely correct? A.Statement 1. B.Statement 2. C.Statement 3. CorreAnswer: CStatement 3 is incorrect. Rebalancing ranges for non-USvelopeequity shoulwir thUS equity unr the cost-benefit (notproportionrange) because it hhigher transaction costs. Rebalancing rangesunr the proportionrange approaare fine+/– 600 basis points forall asset classes in this example anare computefollows. Rebalancing rangesfor bon unr the proportionrange approach:20% × (1 + 600bps) = 20% × 1.06 = 21.2% 20% × (1 – 600bps) = 20% × 0.94 = 18.8%HypotheticalRebalancing Ranges unr Three fferent Approaches 1.statement 3 错误的原因是因为wir是基于成本(答案中)的考虑,而不是基于风险(题干中)的考虑么,2.那为什么不能基于风险的考虑呢?

2024-09-26 09:15 1 · 回答