开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

苏·Xu · 2025年01月25日

道德

NO.PZ2024022002000025

问题如下:

After gathering various public and non-public details about Alpine Energy's investment strategies and their interest in Northeastern Pennsylvania, where Pure Energy, Inc., a company with substantial assets in that area, operates, Claire Jones, CFA, learns that Alpine's CEO is visiting Northeastern Pennsylvania. Subsequently, she advises portfolio manager Lisa Wong, CFA, to invest in Pure Energy. Soon after, an acquisition of Pure Energy by Alpine is announced. Were Jones or Wong likely in breach of the Standards related to capital market integrity?

选项:

A.No, there was no breach of Standards.

B.Yes, Jones based her recommendation on insider information.

C.Yes, both acted on insider information.

解释:

Option A is correct. Jones applied the mosaic theory by integrating non-material, nonpublic information with publicly available data. The fact about the CEO's trip location, by itself, is non-material. Thus, her recommendation and Wong's subsequent action do not constitute a violation of Standards regarding capital market integrity.

这题为什么不违反?????

1 个答案

王暄_品职助教 · 2025年01月25日

Jones 是基于“马赛克理论”做出推荐的。她整合了非公开但非重大的信息(如 CEO 的访问地点)和公开信息来形成她的观点。单独看 CEO 的访问地点这一信息,并不构成重大内幕信息。因此,她的推荐和 Wong 的后续行动并没有违反。

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 4

    浏览
相关问题