开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

xgxinw · 2025年01月17日

老师帮我看一下主观题答案

* 问题详情,请 查看题干

NO.PZ201805280100000402

问题如下:

The Fordhart portfolio has a market value of $2 billion. After his annual meeting

with its investment committee, DuBord notes the following points:

Fordhart must spend 3% of its beginning-of-the-year asset value annually to meet legal obligations.

The investment committee seeks exposure to private equity investments and requests that DuBord review the CFQ Private Equity Fund as a potential new investment.

Enrollment is strong and growing, leading to increased operating revenues from tuition.

A recent legal settlement eliminated an annual obligation of $50 million from the portfolio to support a biodigester used in the university’s Center for Renewable Energy. \

DuBord instructs his second junior analyst to formulate new allocations for

Fordhart. This analyst proposes the allocation presented in Exhibit 2.

Discuss two reasons why the proposed asset allocation is inappropriate for Fordhart.

选项:

解释:

The proposed asset allocation for Fordhart is inappropriate because:

1 Given the increasing enrollment trends and recent favorable legal settlement, Fordhart will likely require lower liquidity in the future. The proposed allocation shifts Fordhart’s portfolio away from risky assets (decreases the relative equity holdings and increases the relative bond holdings).

2 The proposed 10% allocation to private equity creates an overly concentrated position in the underlying investment. A 10% allocation to the CFQ Private Equity Fund is $200 million (10% of Fordhart’s $2 billion). The CFQ Private Equity Fund has assets under management (AUM) of $500 million. Hence, Fordhart would own 40% of the entire CFQ Private Equity Fund. This position exposes both Fordhart and the CFQ fund to an undesirable level of operational risk.

  1. a large foot print for the CFQ Private Equity Fund. as the fund size is 0.5b, and the proposed allocation will allocate 10%of the total market value(2b), which means allocate 0.2 billion in the single PE fund, do not well diversify within the alternative asset class. as Fordhart has 2 billion market value, view as a large asset class, it can allocate in PE about 10%, but, need to diversify in PE section.
  2. as the endowment is strong and growing, also recent legal settlement eliminated an annual obligation of 50 m from the portfolio, Fordhart has relative low liquidity needs and above average risk tolerance, so, it donot need to allocate 59%in investment-Grade Bond. it will be better for the endowment to invest more in Equity or alternatives to generate more potential return.
0 个答案
  • 0

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 2

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ201805280100000402 问题如下 The Forart portfolio ha market valueof $2 billion. After his annumeetingwith its investment committee, Bornotesthe following points:■ Forart must spen3% of itsbeginning-of-the-yeasset value annually to meet legobligations.■ The investment committee seeks exposureto private equity investments anrequests thBorreview the CFQ PrivateEquity Funa potentinew investment.■ Enrollment is strong angrowing, leangto increaseoperating revenues from tuition.■ A recent legsettlement eliminateanannuobligation of $50 million from the portfolio to support a biogesterusein the university’s Center for Renewable Energy. \Borinstructs his seconjunior analystto formulate new allocations forForart. This analyst proposes theallocation presentein Exhibit 2.scuss two reasons why the proposeassetallocation is inappropriate for Forart. The proposeasset allocation for Forartis inappropriate because:1 Given the increasing enrollment trenanrecent favorable legsettlement, Forart will likely require lowerliquity in the future. The proposeallocation shifts Forart’s portfolioawfrom risky assets (creases the relative equity holngs anincreasesthe relative bonholngs).2 The propose10% allocation to privateequity creates overly concentrateposition in the unrlying investment. A10% allocation to the CFQ Private Equity Funis $200 million (10% ofForart’s $2 billion). The CFQ Private Equity Funhassets unr management(AUM) of $500 million. Hence, Forart woulown 40% of the entire CFQ PrivateEquity Fun This position exposes both Forart anthe CFQ funto anunsirable level of operationrisk. 1.Enrollment is strong angrowing, leang to increaseoperating revenues from tuition, whimeans thForart esn't neeto prepare mucash outflow to support the university ancinvest less liquibut higher growth potentiasset class like equity. But the proposeasset allocation invest more bonnot equity.2.The Forart portfolio ha market value of $2 billion whiis larger th$500 million. The CFQ private equity funis $200million(10% ) anit's about 40% of CFQ fun40% is quite concentratein one single fun

2024-12-29 16:39 1 · 回答

NO.PZ201805280100000402 问题如下 The Forart portfolio ha market valueof $2 billion. After his annumeetingwith its investment committee, Bornotesthe following points:■ Forart must spen3% of itsbeginning-of-the-yeasset value annually to meet legobligations.■ The investment committee seeks exposureto private equity investments anrequests thBorreview the CFQ PrivateEquity Funa potentinew investment.■ Enrollment is strong angrowing, leangto increaseoperating revenues from tuition.■ A recent legsettlement eliminateanannuobligation of $50 million from the portfolio to support a biogesterusein the university’s Center for Renewable Energy. \Borinstructs his seconjunior analystto formulate new allocations forForart. This analyst proposes theallocation presentein Exhibit 2.scuss two reasons why the proposeassetallocation is inappropriate for Forart. The proposeasset allocation for Forartis inappropriate because:1 Given the increasing enrollment trenanrecent favorable legsettlement, Forart will likely require lowerliquity in the future. The proposeallocation shifts Forart’s portfolioawfrom risky assets (creases the relative equity holngs anincreasesthe relative bonholngs).2 The propose10% allocation to privateequity creates overly concentrateposition in the unrlying investment. A10% allocation to the CFQ Private Equity Funis $200 million (10% ofForart’s $2 billion). The CFQ Private Equity Funhassets unr management(AUM) of $500 million. Hence, Forart woulown 40% of the entire CFQ PrivateEquity Fun This position exposes both Forart anthe CFQ funto anunsirable level of operationrisk. 2 The propose10% allocation to private equity creates overly concentrateposition in the unrlying investment. A 10% allocation to the CFQ Private Equity Funis $200 million (10% of Forart’s $2 billion). The CFQ Private Equity Funhassets unr management (AUM) of $500 million. Hence, Forart woulown 40% of the entire CFQ Private Equity Fun This position exposes both Forart anthe CFQ funto unsirable level of operationrisk.\"

2024-12-14 00:54 1 · 回答

NO.PZ201805280100000402 问题如下 The Forart portfolio ha market valueof $2 billion. After his annumeetingwith its investment committee, Bornotesthe following points:■ Forart must spen3% of itsbeginning-of-the-yeasset value annually to meet legobligations.■ The investment committee seeks exposureto private equity investments anrequests thBorreview the CFQ PrivateEquity Funa potentinew investment.■ Enrollment is strong angrowing, leangto increaseoperating revenues from tuition.■ A recent legsettlement eliminateanannuobligation of $50 million from the portfolio to support a biogesterusein the university’s Center for Renewable Energy. \Borinstructs his seconjunior analystto formulate new allocations forForart. This analyst proposes theallocation presentein Exhibit 2.scuss two reasons why the proposeassetallocation is inappropriate for Forart. The proposeasset allocation for Forartis inappropriate because:1 Given the increasing enrollment trenanrecent favorable legsettlement, Forart will likely require lowerliquity in the future. The proposeallocation shifts Forart’s portfolioawfrom risky assets (creases the relative equity holngs anincreasesthe relative bonholngs).2 The propose10% allocation to privateequity creates overly concentrateposition in the unrlying investment. A10% allocation to the CFQ Private Equity Funis $200 million (10% ofForart’s $2 billion). The CFQ Private Equity Funhassets unr management(AUM) of $500 million. Hence, Forart woulown 40% of the entire CFQ PrivateEquity Fun This position exposes both Forart anthe CFQ funto anunsirable level of operationrisk. Portfolio在PE的投资过大,会产生流动性风险。一旦LP要推出,但是这个LP占了40%的比例,那么可能退出会受到影响

2024-12-08 17:16 1 · 回答

NO.PZ201805280100000402 问题如下 The Forart portfolio ha market valueof $2 billion. After his annumeetingwith its investment committee, Bornotesthe following points:■ Forart must spen3% of itsbeginning-of-the-yeasset value annually to meet legobligations.■ The investment committee seeks exposureto private equity investments anrequests thBorreview the CFQ PrivateEquity Funa potentinew investment.■ Enrollment is strong angrowing, leangto increaseoperating revenues from tuition.■ A recent legsettlement eliminateanannuobligation of $50 million from the portfolio to support a biogesterusein the university’s Center for Renewable Energy. \Borinstructs his seconjunior analystto formulate new allocations forForart. This analyst proposes theallocation presentein Exhibit 2.scuss two reasons why the proposeassetallocation is inappropriate for Forart. The proposeasset allocation for Forartis inappropriate because:1 Given the increasing enrollment trenanrecent favorable legsettlement, Forart will likely require lowerliquity in the future. The proposeallocation shifts Forart’s portfolioawfrom risky assets (creases the relative equity holngs anincreasesthe relative bonholngs).2 The propose10% allocation to privateequity creates overly concentrateposition in the unrlying investment. A10% allocation to the CFQ Private Equity Funis $200 million (10% ofForart’s $2 billion). The CFQ Private Equity Funhassets unr management(AUM) of $500 million. Hence, Forart woulown 40% of the entire CFQ PrivateEquity Fun This position exposes both Forart anthe CFQ funto anunsirable level of operationrisk. The propose10% allocation to private equity creates overly concentrateposition in the unrlying investment. A 10% allocation to the CFQ Private Equity Funis $200 million (10% of Forart’s $2 billion). The CFQ Private Equity Funhassets unr management (AUM) of $500 million. Hence, Forart woulown 40% of the entire CFQ Private Equity Fun This position exposes both Forart anthe CFQ funto unsirable level of operationrisk.是算在Regulatory another externconsirations这里么

2024-11-03 21:14 1 · 回答

NO.PZ201805280100000402 问题如下 The Forart portfolio ha market valueof $2 billion. After his annumeetingwith its investment committee, Bornotesthe following points:■ Forart must spen3% of itsbeginning-of-the-yeasset value annually to meet legobligations.■ The investment committee seeks exposureto private equity investments anrequests thBorreview the CFQ PrivateEquity Funa potentinew investment.■ Enrollment is strong angrowing, leangto increaseoperating revenues from tuition.■ A recent legsettlement eliminateanannuobligation of $50 million from the portfolio to support a biogesterusein the university’s Center for Renewable Energy. \Borinstructs his seconjunior analystto formulate new allocations forForart. This analyst proposes theallocation presentein Exhibit 2.scuss two reasons why the proposeassetallocation is inappropriate for Forart. The proposeasset allocation for Forartis inappropriate because:1 Given the increasing enrollment trenanrecent favorable legsettlement, Forart will likely require lowerliquity in the future. The proposeallocation shifts Forart’s portfolioawfrom risky assets (creases the relative equity holngs anincreasesthe relative bonholngs).2 The propose10% allocation to privateequity creates overly concentrateposition in the unrlying investment. A10% allocation to the CFQ Private Equity Funis $200 million (10% ofForart’s $2 billion). The CFQ Private Equity Funhassets unr management(AUM) of $500 million. Hence, Forart woulown 40% of the entire CFQ PrivateEquity Fun This position exposes both Forart anthe CFQ funto anunsirable level of operationrisk. 1.题干中没有找到CFQ 500 million信息,为什么说CFQ 500 million?2.40%比例,就说会导致运营风险,为啥?

2024-09-24 14:15 1 · 回答