开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

nilidgnauh · 2025年01月03日

请问为什么不违反独立客观性?

NO.PZ2016040303000040

问题如下:

Townsend was recently appointed to the board of directors of a youth golf program that is the local chapter of a national not-for-profit organization. The program is beginning a new fund-raising campaign to expand the number of annual scholarships it provides. Townsend believes many of her clients make annual donations to charity. The next week in her regular newsletter to all clients, she includes a small section discussing the fundraising campaign and her position on the organization’s board.

选项:

A.

Townsend did not violate the Code and Standards.

B.

Townsend violated the Code and Standards by soliciting donations from her clients through the newsletter.

C.

Townsend violated the Code and Standards by not getting approval of the organization before soliciting her clients.

解释:

A is correct.

Answer Townsend has not provided any information about her clients to the leaders or managers of the golf program; thus, she has not violated Standard III(E) – Preservation of Confidentiality. Providing contact information about her clients for a direct-mail solicitation would have been a violation. Answer B is incorrect because the notice in the newsletter does not violate Standard III(E). Answer C is incorrect because the golf program’s fund-raising campaign had already begun, so discussing the opportunity to donate was appropriate.

T同学自己担任这个组织的director,得知公司客户会做慈善捐款,然后在公司信件中向客户提及自己的这个organization的募捐,好像是有不妥(为自己谋到了好处),除了独立客观性,好像还违反了对客户或者对雇主的忠诚,还有就是有“pay to play”的嫌疑,请问应该如何分析这种情况?

1 个答案

王暄_品职助教 · 2025年01月04日

仅仅提及募捐活动并不直接等同于违反独立性和客观性。关键在于她是否以公正、无偏见的方式提供了信息,以及是否强迫或诱导客户捐款。

如果她是以透明、公正的方式提及,且没有强迫或诱导客户捐款,同时也没有将捐款与业务关系挂钩,那么她的行为可能是合规的。

然而,如果她的行为导致客户感到被迫捐款或认为存在“pay to play”的情况,那么这就可能违反了职业道德准则。但是本题中,并没有让客户被迫捐款的情况,因此也不存在pay to play的情况


  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 3

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ2016040303000040 问题如下 Townsenwrecently appointeto the boarof rectors of a youth golf progrthis the locchapter of a nationnot-for-profit organization. The progris beginning a new funraising campaign to expanthe number of annuscholarships it provis. Townsenbelieves many of her clients make annunations to charity. The next week in her regulnewsletter to all clients, she inclus a small section scussing the funaising campaign anher position on the organization’s boar A.Townsennot violate the Co anStanr. B.Townsenviolatethe Co anStanr soliciting nations from her clients through the newsletter. C.Townsenviolatethe Co anStanr not getting approvof the organization before soliciting her clients. A is correct.Answer Townsenhnot proviany information about her clients to the lears or managers of the golf program; thus, she hnot violateStanrIII(E) – Preservation of Confintiality. Proving containformation about her clients for a rect-mail solicitation woulhave been a violation. Answer B is incorrebecause the notiin the newsletter es not violate StanrIII(E). Answer C is incorrebecause the golf program’s funraising campaign halrea begun, so scussing the opportunity to nate wappropriate. 她利用公司渠道发邮件给客户募集捐款,这个不是以权谋私吗?为什么没有违反呢?客户可能是因为信任公司这个品牌所以也会信任这个募捐,如果最后被发现募捐有问题(假募捐之类的),不是伤害了公司的声誉吗?

2024-07-08 08:30 2 · 回答

NO.PZ2016040303000040 问题如下 Townsenwrecently appointeto the boarof rectors of a youth golf progrthis the locchapter of a nationnot-for-profit organization. The progris beginning a new funraising campaign to expanthe number of annuscholarships it provis. Townsenbelieves many of her clients make annunations to charity. The next week in her regulnewsletter to all clients, she inclus a small section scussing the funaising campaign anher position on the organization’s boar A.Townsennot violate the Co anStanr. B.Townsenviolatethe Co anStanr soliciting nations from her clients through the newsletter. C.Townsenviolatethe Co anStanr not getting approvof the organization before soliciting her clients. A is correct.Answer Townsenhnot proviany information about her clients to the lears or managers of the golf program; thus, she hnot violateStanrIII(E) – Preservation of Confintiality. Proving containformation about her clients for a rect-mail solicitation woulhave been a violation. Answer B is incorrebecause the notiin the newsletter es not violate StanrIII(E). Answer C is incorrebecause the golf program’s funraising campaign halrea begun, so scussing the opportunity to nate wappropriate. 工作邮件里面发私人request里面为什么是没有违反职业道德啊?

2024-01-24 15:55 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2016040303000040问题如下 Townsenwrecently appointeto the boarof rectors of a youth golf progrthis the locchapter of a nationnot-for-profit organization. The progris beginning a new funraising campaign to expanthe number of annuscholarships it provis. Townsenbelieves many of her clients make annunations to charity. The next week in her regulnewsletter to all clients, she inclus a small section scussing the funaising campaign anher position on the organization’s boarA.Townsennot violate the Co anStanr.B.Townsenviolatethe Co anStanr soliciting nations from her clients through the newsletter.C.Townsenviolatethe Co anStanr not getting approvof the organization before soliciting her clients.A is correct.Answer Townsenhnot proviany information about her clients to the lears or managers of the golf program; thus, she hnot violateStanrIII(E) – Preservation of Confintiality. Proving containformation about her clients for a rect-mail solicitation woulhave been a violation. Answer B is incorrebecause the notiin the newsletter es not violate StanrIII(E). Answer C is incorrebecause the golf program’s funraising campaign halrea begun, so scussing the opportunity to nate wappropriate.做募捐不需要取得公司的同意吗?

2022-11-28 10:46 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2016040303000040 问题如下 Townsenwrecently appointeto the boarof rectors of a youth golf progrthis the locchapter of a nationnot-for-profit organization. The progris beginning a new funraising campaign to expanthe number of annuscholarships it provis. Townsenbelieves many of her clients make annunations to charity. The next week in her regulnewsletter to all clients, she inclus a small section scussing the funaising campaign anher position on the organization’s boar A.Townsennot violate the Co anStanr. B.Townsenviolatethe Co anStanr soliciting nations from her clients through the newsletter. C.Townsenviolatethe Co anStanr not getting approvof the organization before soliciting her clients. A is correct.Answer Townsenhnot proviany information about her clients to the lears or managers of the golf program; thus, she hnot violateStanrIII(E) – Preservation of Confintiality. Proving containformation about her clients for a rect-mail solicitation woulhave been a violation. Answer B is incorrebecause the notiin the newsletter es not violate StanrIII(E). Answer C is incorrebecause the golf program’s funraising campaign halrea begun, so scussing the opportunity to nate wappropriate. 客户捐款的话,不是会导致雇主的AUM下降么..这不算利益冲突么

2022-08-01 21:21 1 · 回答