开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

mino酱是个小破货 · 2024年12月25日

烦请老师帮忙看下是否可以这么回答,谢谢老师

* 问题详情,请 查看题干

NO.PZ201803130100000401

问题如下:

Contrast, using the information provided above, the results of a reverse optimization approach with that of the MVO approach for each of the following:
i. The asset allocation mix. Justify your response.

选项:

解释:

■ The asset allocation weights for the reverse optimization method are inputs into the optimization and are determined by the market capitalization weights of the global market portfolio.

■ The asset allocation weights for the MVO method are outputs of the optimization with the expected returns, covariances, and a risk aversion coefficient used as inputs.

■ The two methods result in significantly different asset allocation mixes.

■ In contrast to MVO, the reverse optimization method results in a higher percentage point allocation to global bonds, US bonds, and global equities as well as a lower percentage point allocation to cash and US equities.

The reverse optimization method takes the asset allocation weights as its inputs that are assumed to be optimal. These weights are calculated as the market capitalization weights of a global market portfolio. In contrast, the outputs of an MVO are the asset allocation weights, which are based on (1) expected returns and covariances that are forecasted using historical data and (2) a risk aversion coefficient. The two methods result in significantly different asset allocation mixes. In contrast to MVO, the reverse optimization method results in a 4.9, 5.5, and 10.1 higher percentage point allocation to US bonds, global equities, and global bonds, respectively, and a 6.1 and 14.4 lower percentage point allocation to cash and US equities, respectively.
The asset allocation under the two methods is as follows:



reverse optimization:

cash=4.2/107.8=3.90%,US bonds=24.86%

US equities=20.59,Global equities=25.51%,Global bonds=25.14%

The asset allocation of MVOis more concentrated, the asset allocation of reverse optimizaton is more diversified.

The output of MVO is the input of reverse optimization.In reverse optimization, we use global market weights as the effective weights, the volatilty, and corellation as input to calculate the expected return. In MVO, we use expected return, volatility and correlation to calculate the asset allocation weights.

1 个答案

Lucky_品职助教 · 2024年12月26日

嗨,爱思考的PZer你好:


同学你好:


这个问,就是在考察MVO方法和reverse optimization方法的区别,也就是,我们需要说清楚,MVO的方法的缺点,以及reverse optimization方法是怎样解决MVO缺点的。

你最开始的计算没有问题,用数字进行对比很直观。对比之后,先说一下MVO的缺点,再说一下reverse optimization怎么解决的就好,比如:

MVO的方法,有两个比较重要的缺点,一个是highly sensitive to small changes in the input,另一个是分散化不足,配置的权重会集中于某些资产类型。而reverse optimization一个很重要的特点就是,通过已知权重、标准差、相关性,反向求出implied return,这里的权重通常使用的是资产的市值权重,所以求出来的implied return更稳定、更准确,因此得出的资产配置分散化效果也更好,所以能够解决MVO的相应缺点。

----------------------------------------------
加油吧,让我们一起遇见更好的自己!

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 6

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ201803130100000401 问题如下 Contrast, using the information proviabove, the results of a reverse optimization approawith thof the MVO approafor eaof the following:i. The asset allocation mix. Justify your response. ■ The asset allocation weights for the reverse optimization methoare inputs into the optimization anare terminethe market capitalization weights of the globmarket portfolio.■ The asset allocation weights for the MVO methoare outputs of the optimization with the expectereturns, covariances, ana risk aversion coefficient useinputs.■ The two metho result in significantly fferent asset allocation mixes.■ In contrast to MVO, the reverse optimization methoresults in a higher percentage point allocation to globbon, US bon, anglobequities well a lower percentage point allocation to cash anUS equities.The reverse optimization methotakes the asset allocation weights its inputs thare assumeto optimal. These weights are calculatethe market capitalization weights of a globmarket portfolio. In contrast, the outputs of MVO are the asset allocation weights, whiare baseon (1) expectereturns ancovariances thare forecasteusing historicta an(2) a risk aversion coefficient. The two metho result in significantly fferent asset allocation mixes. In contrast to MVO, the reverse optimization methoresults in a 4.9, 5.5, an10.1 higher percentage point allocation to US bon, globequities, anglobbon, respectively, ana 6.1 an14.4 lower percentage point allocation to cash anUS equities, respectively.The asset allocation unr the two metho is follows: 考试的时候是回答各个资产的权重就行(reverse optimization这一列),还是得把变化也写上?(最后一列)

2024-08-28 18:40 1 · 回答

NO.PZ201803130100000401 问题如下 Contrast, using the information proviabove, the results of a reverse optimization approawith thof the MVO approafor eaof the following:i. The asset allocation mix. Justify your response. ■ The asset allocation weights for the reverse optimization methoare inputs into the optimization anare terminethe market capitalization weights of the globmarket portfolio.■ The asset allocation weights for the MVO methoare outputs of the optimization with the expectereturns, covariances, ana risk aversion coefficient useinputs.■ The two metho result in significantly fferent asset allocation mixes.■ In contrast to MVO, the reverse optimization methoresults in a higher percentage point allocation to globbon, US bon, anglobequities well a lower percentage point allocation to cash anUS equities.The reverse optimization methotakes the asset allocation weights its inputs thare assumeto optimal. These weights are calculatethe market capitalization weights of a globmarket portfolio. In contrast, the outputs of MVO are the asset allocation weights, whiare baseon (1) expectereturns ancovariances thare forecasteusing historicta an(2) a risk aversion coefficient. The two metho result in significantly fferent asset allocation mixes. In contrast to MVO, the reverse optimization methoresults in a 4.9, 5.5, an10.1 higher percentage point allocation to US bon, globequities, anglobbon, respectively, ana 6.1 an14.4 lower percentage point allocation to cash anUS equities, respectively.The asset allocation unr the two metho is follows: 如题

2024-08-04 01:09 1 · 回答

NO.PZ201803130100000401 问题如下 Contrast, using the information proviabove, the results of a reverse optimization approawith thof the MVO approafor eaof the following:i. The asset allocation mix. Justify your response. ■ The asset allocation weights for the reverse optimization methoare inputs into the optimization anare terminethe market capitalization weights of the globmarket portfolio.■ The asset allocation weights for the MVO methoare outputs of the optimization with the expectereturns, covariances, ana risk aversion coefficient useinputs.■ The two metho result in significantly fferent asset allocation mixes.■ In contrast to MVO, the reverse optimization methoresults in a higher percentage point allocation to globbon, US bon, anglobequities well a lower percentage point allocation to cash anUS equities.The reverse optimization methotakes the asset allocation weights its inputs thare assumeto optimal. These weights are calculatethe market capitalization weights of a globmarket portfolio. In contrast, the outputs of MVO are the asset allocation weights, whiare baseon (1) expectereturns ancovariances thare forecasteusing historicta an(2) a risk aversion coefficient. The two metho result in significantly fferent asset allocation mixes. In contrast to MVO, the reverse optimization methoresults in a 4.9, 5.5, an10.1 higher percentage point allocation to US bon, globequities, anglobbon, respectively, ana 6.1 an14.4 lower percentage point allocation to cash anUS equities, respectively.The asset allocation unr the two metho is follows: In contrast to MVO, the reverse optimization methoresults in a higher percentage point allocation to globbon, US bon, anglobequities well a lower percentage point allocation to cash anUS equities.为什么呢

2024-05-02 12:54 1 · 回答

NO.PZ201803130100000401 问题如下 Contrast, using the information proviabove, the results of a reverse optimization approawith thof the MVO approafor eaof the following:i. The asset allocation mix. Justify your response. ■ The asset allocation weights for the reverse optimization methoare inputs into the optimization anare terminethe market capitalization weights of the globmarket portfolio.■ The asset allocation weights for the MVO methoare outputs of the optimization with the expectereturns, covariances, ana risk aversion coefficient useinputs.■ The two metho result in significantly fferent asset allocation mixes.■ In contrast to MVO, the reverse optimization methoresults in a higher percentage point allocation to globbon, US bon, anglobequities well a lower percentage point allocation to cash anUS equities.The reverse optimization methotakes the asset allocation weights its inputs thare assumeto optimal. These weights are calculatethe market capitalization weights of a globmarket portfolio. In contrast, the outputs of MVO are the asset allocation weights, whiare baseon (1) expectereturns ancovariances thare forecasteusing historicta an(2) a risk aversion coefficient. The two metho result in significantly fferent asset allocation mixes. In contrast to MVO, the reverse optimization methoresults in a 4.9, 5.5, an10.1 higher percentage point allocation to US bon, globequities, anglobbon, respectively, ana 6.1 an14.4 lower percentage point allocation to cash anUS equities, respectively.The asset allocation unr the two metho is follows: 第一题的第二小问为什么使用CAPM来求资产大类的impliereturn?课程中何老师是说用资产大类的市值权重来求?

2024-04-23 00:12 1 · 回答