开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

AvenYu · 2024年11月06日

为什么不是both firms定价呢?

NO.PZ2023071902000036

问题如下:

Question Suppose two corporations in a two-player market collaborate, aiming to set up a cartel to reduce production, boost prices, and amplify earnings. In line with the Nash equilibrium, a reduced price would probably be set by:

选项:

A.only one firm. B.both firms. C.neither firm.

解释:

Solution
  1. The market dynamics for two corporations in a in a duopoly can be visualized in the diagram. The bottom-left quadrant represents the Nash solution when there's no collaboration. In the case of collaboration, if ArcCo allocates enough profit in the bottom-right quadrant to offer BatCo more than it would earn in the bottom-left quadrant, this strategy will be the optimal one for the duo: they will reach peak combined profits when both corporations set high prices for their goods.
  2. MAX17009-MC-Fe

The Firm and Market Structures

• explain supply and demand relationships under oligopoly, including the optimal price and output for firms as well as pricing strategy

双寡头垄断中两家公司的市场动态可以由上表呈现。左下象限代表没有合作时的纳什解。在合作的情况下,如果ArcCo在右下象限分配足够的利润,给BatCo提供的利润比它在左下象限获得的利润要多,那么这种策略将是两家公司的最优策略:当两家公司都为自己的商品设定高价格时,它们的总利润将达到峰值。

答案没看懂,为什么两家公司设定的高低价都很不同??


当两家公司都为自己的商品设定高价格时,它们的总利润将达到峰值。--> 为什么价格不是由both firms定的呢?如果是neither firm,那是谁来定啊?

1 个答案

品职助教_七七 · 2024年11月06日

嗨,从没放弃的小努力你好:


这道题的背景是要去“set up a cartel to...boost prices, and amplify earnings”。也就是这两个公司要同时提价来达到双方利润最大化。

在这种情况下,没有任何一家公司会选择去降价(reduced price)。也正是因为这个原因才选择“neither firm”。

----------------------------------------------
努力的时光都是限量版,加油!

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 26

    浏览