开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

沉睡宝宝鸭 · 2024年10月20日

请问,exposure的概念不是只考虑正敞口么,负数直接记为0,

NO.PZ2024050101000109

问题如下:

Assume three counterparties (A, B and C) are entered into bilateral derivative trades with the following net current replacement values: replacement value for A with respect to B = $10 million (i.e., if closed out immediately, B would owe $10 million to A); replacement value for B with respect to C = $10 million; replacement value for C with respect to A = $10 million. If these positions were immediately novated to central counterparty with multilateral netting, which of the following is implied?

选项:

A.

Counterparty exposures among A, B and C are each eliminated to zero; but each will have a $10 million exposure to the central counterparty.

B.

Counterparty exposures among A, B and C are each eliminated to zero; and each will have zero exposure to the central counterparty.

C.

Counterparty exposures among A, B and C are, in total, reduced from $30 million to $10 million; and the central counterparty assumes $20 million in exposure

D.

The total exposure is not reduced from $30 million; it is effectively transferred to the central counterparty

解释:

当存在CCP时,ABC每个人都是给CCP10,CCP给ABC分别10,那么对于exposure来说,应该只考虑单项,即ABC对CCP的exposure都是10,这样想为什么不对?

1 个答案

pzqa27 · 2024年10月21日

嗨,从没放弃的小努力你好:


请问,exposure的概念不是只考虑正敞口么,负数直接记为0

这里是考虑了netting,因此不可以直接把负敞口抹成0,需要先把正的敞口和负的敞口进行netting后再作考虑。


当存在CCP时,ABC每个人都是给CCP10,CCP给ABC分别10,那么对于exposure来说,应该只考虑单项,即ABC对CCP的exposure都是10,这样想为什么不对?

当存在CCP的时候,ABC每人欠CCP10,同时CCP也要给ABC每人10,因此netting后总的敞口是0.

----------------------------------------------
虽然现在很辛苦,但努力过的感觉真的很好,加油!