开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

徐威廉 · 2024年10月20日

B选项

NO.PZ2019042401000053

问题如下:

A consultant is analyzing the disclosures hedge funds are mandated to file with the US Securities and Exchange Commission. The consultant emphasizes how investors can utilize these disclosures to identify and manage fraud risk. Which of the following statements is correct?

选项:

A.

Disclosures of past regulatory or legal violations are not reliable indicators of fraud risk due to the evolving nature of circumstances.

B.

There is not enough evidence to conclude that investors of hedge funds are compensated for fraud risk by receiving higher returns.

C.

Regulatory and legal prohibitions effectively prevent fraud, and inadequate disclosure requirements on violations contribute to fraudulent activities.

D.

Disclosures of regulatory and legal violations primarily benefit investors with access to expensive real-time data, excluding a significant portion of investors.

解释:

B is correct. There’s no evidence that supports that investors are compensated for fraud risk through higher returns or lower fees. A is incorrect. Disclosures regarding past regulatory or legal violations are effective in predicting fraud. C is incorrect. Although certain characteristics, such as conflicts of interest, can predict fraud, we cannot infer that conflicts of interest cause fraud, or that their prohibition would deter fraud. D is incorrect. In the past, SEC didn’t provide access to historical data (contemporaneous data has always been available) but this is not the case anymore. Up until 2007, the investing public’s ability to develop and use predictive models based on Form ADV data was potentially limited because the SEC did not provide access to historical data. As a result, the realized benefits of disclosure during that time frame may have been lower. The results of the study given in the reading suggest that improving public access to comprehensive historical disclosures could increase the benefits these disclosures were meant to provide.

B选项这句话翻译过来就是“没有充分的证据可以推测出投资者因为程度欺诈风险而获得高昂的回报”,这句话在说什么?为什么是对的?答非所问啊

1 个答案
已采纳答案

pzqa39 · 2024年10月21日

嗨,爱思考的PZer你好:


B选项翻译成中文为:“没有足够的证据表明,对冲基金的投资者因为承担欺诈风险而获得更高的回报。”

这句话的意思是,尽管投资对冲基金可能存在欺诈风险,但没有研究或证据支持投资者通过承担这一风险获得了更高的回报或支付了较低的费用来补偿这一风险。换句话说,承担欺诈风险并不会自动带来额外的财务回报。


之所以这个选项是正确的,是因为欺诈风险并不像市场风险那样容易定价或衡量。市场上的投资回报通常是对系统性风险(如市场波动、利率变化等)的补偿,而欺诈风险是一种非系统性风险,且具有不可预测性和突发性。因此,投资者不太可能通过高回报或低费用来获得对于这一特殊风险的补偿。此外,欺诈的本质决定了它是法律和监管框架下需要极力避免的行为,而不是可以通过市场机制来弥补的风险。


题目问的是:投资者如何利用对冲基金向美国证券交易委员会(SEC)提交的披露文件来识别和管理欺诈风险。题目要找出的是哪个陈述正确地反映了这些披露文件在识别和管理欺诈风险中的作用。

问题的核心是如何通过披露文件识别欺诈风险,并且投资者是否能够通过承担欺诈风险获得补偿。选项B回答了这一问题,表明尽管存在欺诈风险,但没有证据表明投资者可以通过获得更高的回报来补偿这一风险。

----------------------------------------------
虽然现在很辛苦,但努力过的感觉真的很好,加油!

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 39

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ2019042401000053 问题如下 A consultant is analyzing the sclosures hee fun are manteto file with the US Securities anExchange Commission. The consultant emphasizes how investors cutilize these sclosures to intify anmanage fraurisk. Whiof the following statements is correct? A.sclosures of past regulatory or legviolations are not reliable incators of fraurisk e to the evolving nature of circumstances. B.There is not enough evinto conclu thinvestors of hee fun arecompensatefor fraurisk receiving higher returns. C.Regulatory anlegprohibitions effectively prevent frau aninaquate sclosure requirements on violations contribute to fraulent activities. sclosures of regulatory anlegviolations primarily benefit investors with access to expensive real-time texclung a significant portion of investors. B is correct. There’s no evinthsupports thinvestors are compensateforfraurisk through higher returns or lower fees.A is incorrect. sclosures regarng past regulatory or legviolations are effectivein precting frauC is incorrect. Although certain characteristics, suconflicts of interest, canprefrau we cannot infer thconflicts of interest cause frau or ththeirprohibition woulter frauis incorrect. In the past, SEC ’t provi access to historicta(contemporaneous ta halways been available) but this is not the caseanymore. Up until 2007, the investing public’s ability to velop anuse prectivemols baseon Form A ta wpotentially limitebecause the SEC notprovi access to historicta result, the realizebenefits of sclosurering thtime frame mhave been lower. The results of the stu given in thereang suggest thimproving public access to comprehensive historicalsclosures coulincrease the benefits these sclosures were meant to provi. 如题

2024-03-19 15:24 1 · 回答