NO.PZ2019042401000053
问题如下:
A consultant is analyzing the disclosures hedge funds are mandated to file with the US Securities and Exchange Commission. The consultant emphasizes how investors can utilize these disclosures to identify and manage fraud risk. Which of the following statements is correct?
选项:
A.Disclosures of past regulatory or legal violations are not reliable indicators of fraud risk due to the evolving nature of circumstances.
There is not enough evidence to conclude that investors of hedge funds are
compensated for fraud risk by receiving higher returns.
Regulatory and legal prohibitions effectively prevent fraud, and inadequate disclosure requirements on violations contribute to fraudulent activities.
Disclosures of regulatory and legal violations primarily benefit investors with access to expensive real-time data, excluding a significant portion of investors.
解释:
B is correct. There’s no evidence that supports that investors are compensated for
fraud risk through higher returns or lower fees.
A is incorrect. Disclosures regarding past regulatory or legal violations are effective
in predicting fraud.
C is incorrect. Although certain characteristics, such as conflicts of interest, can
predict fraud, we cannot infer that conflicts of interest cause fraud, or that their
prohibition would deter fraud.
D is incorrect. In the past, SEC didn’t provide access to historical data
(contemporaneous data has always been available) but this is not the case
anymore. Up until 2007, the investing public’s ability to develop and use predictive
models based on Form ADV data was potentially limited because the SEC did not
provide access to historical data. As a result, the realized benefits of disclosure
during that time frame may have been lower. The results of the study given in the
reading suggest that improving public access to comprehensive historical
disclosures could increase the benefits these disclosures were meant to provide.
B选项这句话翻译过来就是“没有充分的证据可以推测出投资者因为程度欺诈风险而获得高昂的回报”,这句话在说什么?为什么是对的?答非所问啊