开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

ditto · 2024年10月15日

为什么不是misconduct

NO.PZ2024022002000073

问题如下:

Christina Ng, preparing for her Level I CFA exam, encountered financial difficulties after prioritizing unexpected wedding expenses over a student loan, leading to a default. A microfinance institution then cleared her educational loan and further provided assistance for her parents’ medical expenses. Subsequently, her parents' deteriorating health forced Ng to take prolonged leave from work, resulting in her termination and default on the second loan, culminating in personal bankruptcy. Are these events likely to constitute a breach of Standard I(D)–Misconduct?

选项:

A.Unlikely to constitute misconduct.

B.Likely a violation due to the first loan default.

C.Likely a violation due to the second loan default.

解释:

Option A is correct. Despite Ng's financial struggles stemming from prioritizing her wedding over education loan repayment and leading to two defaults and bankruptcy, these events, stemming from personal hardships and not involving deceit or fraud, are unlikely to be seen as a violation of Standard I(D)–Misconduct.

第二个loan。她为了照顾父母长时间离开工作,这样都影响专业性了还不算misconduct吗

1 个答案
已采纳答案

王暄_品职助教 · 2024年10月15日

Ng的贷款违约和个人破产是由于个人经济困难和家庭紧急情况,而非故意欺骗或不诚实行为。她并没有利用职权谋取私利或进行欺诈活动。尽管她长时间请假可能影响了工作,但这是出于照顾父母的正当理由,并不直接构成Misconduct。

Misconduct主要涉及欺诈、不诚实行为、滥用职权或违反职业责任等行为。关键在于判断Ng的行为是否涉及欺骗、不诚实或故意违反她的职业责任。



  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 47

    浏览
相关问题